Cargando…

Several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis

BACKGROUND: Dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atrial electrograms has become an important method in characterizing atrial fibrillation (AF). As a classic method, Botteron’s approach is widely used in the preprocessing of frequency analysis during AF. It includes three steps: (1) band-pass filterin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Wenhai, Yang, Cuiwei, Wang, Yanlei, Wang, Dexi, Chen, Ying, Wu, Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0157-2
_version_ 1782426648319098880
author Li, Wenhai
Yang, Cuiwei
Wang, Yanlei
Wang, Dexi
Chen, Ying
Wu, Zhong
author_facet Li, Wenhai
Yang, Cuiwei
Wang, Yanlei
Wang, Dexi
Chen, Ying
Wu, Zhong
author_sort Li, Wenhai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atrial electrograms has become an important method in characterizing atrial fibrillation (AF). As a classic method, Botteron’s approach is widely used in the preprocessing of frequency analysis during AF. It includes three steps: (1) band-pass filtering at 40–250 Hz, (2) absolute value, and (3) low-pass filtering at 20 Hz. This paper aims to expound the necessity and adjustability of each step. METHODS AND RESULTS: Unipolar epicardial mapping signals were recorded during AF from eight mongrel dogs with cholinergic AF model. Episodes of these data were randomly selected to evaluate the impact of different pass bands and the necessity of low-pass filtering with 20 Hz cutoff frequency. Each episode of AF signal is 5 s long with a sampling rate of 2 kHz. Simulated electrograms were adopted to discuss the role of taking absolute value. Furthermore, direct spectral analysis method (FFT et al.) is compared with Botteron’s preprocessing approach. According to our statistical analysis, the pass band of 40–250 Hz was not the best, while 20–100 Hz presented the high accuracy rate of DF. From the comparing result of direct FFT without Botteron’s approach we deduced that the rectification of absolute value was meaningful for the fundamental atrial frequency. The final step, 20 Hz low-pass filter can completely be omitted in DF analysis. In consideration of the demand for real-time distribution of DF in clinical or experimental situations, down-sampling method and the impact of ventricular artifacts on DF was also discussed. CONCLUSION: In the actual application of the three preprocessing steps, the pass band selection of band-pass filter can be adjusted and the rectification of taking absolute value is important. Nevertheless, the final step of 20 Hz low-pass filter is totally unnecessary. In real-time signal processing situations, taking down-sampling method and ignoring the ventricular artifacts can also have high performance in DF analysis of atrial electrograms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4828784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48287842016-04-13 Several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis Li, Wenhai Yang, Cuiwei Wang, Yanlei Wang, Dexi Chen, Ying Wu, Zhong Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atrial electrograms has become an important method in characterizing atrial fibrillation (AF). As a classic method, Botteron’s approach is widely used in the preprocessing of frequency analysis during AF. It includes three steps: (1) band-pass filtering at 40–250 Hz, (2) absolute value, and (3) low-pass filtering at 20 Hz. This paper aims to expound the necessity and adjustability of each step. METHODS AND RESULTS: Unipolar epicardial mapping signals were recorded during AF from eight mongrel dogs with cholinergic AF model. Episodes of these data were randomly selected to evaluate the impact of different pass bands and the necessity of low-pass filtering with 20 Hz cutoff frequency. Each episode of AF signal is 5 s long with a sampling rate of 2 kHz. Simulated electrograms were adopted to discuss the role of taking absolute value. Furthermore, direct spectral analysis method (FFT et al.) is compared with Botteron’s preprocessing approach. According to our statistical analysis, the pass band of 40–250 Hz was not the best, while 20–100 Hz presented the high accuracy rate of DF. From the comparing result of direct FFT without Botteron’s approach we deduced that the rectification of absolute value was meaningful for the fundamental atrial frequency. The final step, 20 Hz low-pass filter can completely be omitted in DF analysis. In consideration of the demand for real-time distribution of DF in clinical or experimental situations, down-sampling method and the impact of ventricular artifacts on DF was also discussed. CONCLUSION: In the actual application of the three preprocessing steps, the pass band selection of band-pass filter can be adjusted and the rectification of taking absolute value is important. Nevertheless, the final step of 20 Hz low-pass filter is totally unnecessary. In real-time signal processing situations, taking down-sampling method and ignoring the ventricular artifacts can also have high performance in DF analysis of atrial electrograms. BioMed Central 2016-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4828784/ /pubmed/27067549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0157-2 Text en © Li et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Wenhai
Yang, Cuiwei
Wang, Yanlei
Wang, Dexi
Chen, Ying
Wu, Zhong
Several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis
title Several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis
title_full Several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis
title_fullStr Several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis
title_full_unstemmed Several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis
title_short Several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis
title_sort several insights into the preprocessing of electrograms in atrial fibrillation for dominant frequency analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0157-2
work_keys_str_mv AT liwenhai severalinsightsintothepreprocessingofelectrogramsinatrialfibrillationfordominantfrequencyanalysis
AT yangcuiwei severalinsightsintothepreprocessingofelectrogramsinatrialfibrillationfordominantfrequencyanalysis
AT wangyanlei severalinsightsintothepreprocessingofelectrogramsinatrialfibrillationfordominantfrequencyanalysis
AT wangdexi severalinsightsintothepreprocessingofelectrogramsinatrialfibrillationfordominantfrequencyanalysis
AT chenying severalinsightsintothepreprocessingofelectrogramsinatrialfibrillationfordominantfrequencyanalysis
AT wuzhong severalinsightsintothepreprocessingofelectrogramsinatrialfibrillationfordominantfrequencyanalysis