Cargando…

A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors

BACKGROUND: There is a workforce crisis in primary care. Previous research has looked at the reasons underlying recruitment and retention problems, but little research has looked at what works to improve recruitment and retention. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate interventions and st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verma, Puja, Ford, John A., Stuart, Arabella, Howe, Amanda, Everington, Sam, Steel, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1370-1
_version_ 1782426654966022144
author Verma, Puja
Ford, John A.
Stuart, Arabella
Howe, Amanda
Everington, Sam
Steel, Nicholas
author_facet Verma, Puja
Ford, John A.
Stuart, Arabella
Howe, Amanda
Everington, Sam
Steel, Nicholas
author_sort Verma, Puja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a workforce crisis in primary care. Previous research has looked at the reasons underlying recruitment and retention problems, but little research has looked at what works to improve recruitment and retention. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate interventions and strategies used to recruit and retain primary care doctors internationally. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and grey literature were searched from inception to January 2015. Articles assessing interventions aimed at recruiting or retaining doctors in high income countries, applicable to primary care doctors were included. No restrictions on language or year of publication. The first author screened all titles and abstracts and a second author screened 20 %. Data extraction was carried out by one author and checked by a second. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies assessing 42 interventions were retrieved. Interventions were categorised into thirteen groups: financial incentives (n = 11), recruiting rural students (n = 6), international recruitment (n = 4), rural or primary care focused undergraduate placements (n = 3), rural or underserved postgraduate training (n = 3), well-being or peer support initiatives (n = 3), marketing (n = 2), mixed interventions (n = 5), support for professional development or research (n = 5), retainer schemes (n = 4), re-entry schemes (n = 1), specialised recruiters or case managers (n = 2) and delayed partnerships (n = 2). Studies were of low methodological quality with no RCTs and only 15 studies with a comparison group. Weak evidence supported the use of postgraduate placements in underserved areas, undergraduate rural placements and recruiting students to medical school from rural areas. There was mixed evidence about financial incentives. A marketing campaign was associated with lower recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review of interventions to improve recruitment and retention of primary care doctors. Although the evidence base for recruiting and care doctors is weak and more high quality research is needed, this review found evidence to support undergraduate and postgraduate placements in underserved areas, and selective recruitment of medical students. Other initiatives covered may have potential to improve recruitment and retention of primary care practitioners, but their effectiveness has not been established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4828812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48288122016-04-13 A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors Verma, Puja Ford, John A. Stuart, Arabella Howe, Amanda Everington, Sam Steel, Nicholas BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a workforce crisis in primary care. Previous research has looked at the reasons underlying recruitment and retention problems, but little research has looked at what works to improve recruitment and retention. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate interventions and strategies used to recruit and retain primary care doctors internationally. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and grey literature were searched from inception to January 2015. Articles assessing interventions aimed at recruiting or retaining doctors in high income countries, applicable to primary care doctors were included. No restrictions on language or year of publication. The first author screened all titles and abstracts and a second author screened 20 %. Data extraction was carried out by one author and checked by a second. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies assessing 42 interventions were retrieved. Interventions were categorised into thirteen groups: financial incentives (n = 11), recruiting rural students (n = 6), international recruitment (n = 4), rural or primary care focused undergraduate placements (n = 3), rural or underserved postgraduate training (n = 3), well-being or peer support initiatives (n = 3), marketing (n = 2), mixed interventions (n = 5), support for professional development or research (n = 5), retainer schemes (n = 4), re-entry schemes (n = 1), specialised recruiters or case managers (n = 2) and delayed partnerships (n = 2). Studies were of low methodological quality with no RCTs and only 15 studies with a comparison group. Weak evidence supported the use of postgraduate placements in underserved areas, undergraduate rural placements and recruiting students to medical school from rural areas. There was mixed evidence about financial incentives. A marketing campaign was associated with lower recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review of interventions to improve recruitment and retention of primary care doctors. Although the evidence base for recruiting and care doctors is weak and more high quality research is needed, this review found evidence to support undergraduate and postgraduate placements in underserved areas, and selective recruitment of medical students. Other initiatives covered may have potential to improve recruitment and retention of primary care practitioners, but their effectiveness has not been established. BioMed Central 2016-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4828812/ /pubmed/27067255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1370-1 Text en © Verma et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Verma, Puja
Ford, John A.
Stuart, Arabella
Howe, Amanda
Everington, Sam
Steel, Nicholas
A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors
title A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors
title_full A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors
title_fullStr A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors
title_short A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors
title_sort systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1370-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vermapuja asystematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT fordjohna asystematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT stuartarabella asystematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT howeamanda asystematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT everingtonsam asystematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT steelnicholas asystematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT vermapuja systematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT fordjohna systematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT stuartarabella systematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT howeamanda systematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT everingtonsam systematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors
AT steelnicholas systematicreviewofstrategiestorecruitandretainprimarycaredoctors