Cargando…

An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections are a common clinical problem in both acute and chronic wounds. With growing concerns over antibiotic resistance, treatment of bacterial infections should only occur after positive diagnosis. Currently, diagnosis is delayed due to lengthy culturing methods which may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becerra, Sandra C., Roy, Daniel C., Sanchez, Carlos J., Christy, Robert J., Burmeister, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27071769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1902-0
_version_ 1782426658942222336
author Becerra, Sandra C.
Roy, Daniel C.
Sanchez, Carlos J.
Christy, Robert J.
Burmeister, David M.
author_facet Becerra, Sandra C.
Roy, Daniel C.
Sanchez, Carlos J.
Christy, Robert J.
Burmeister, David M.
author_sort Becerra, Sandra C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections are a common clinical problem in both acute and chronic wounds. With growing concerns over antibiotic resistance, treatment of bacterial infections should only occur after positive diagnosis. Currently, diagnosis is delayed due to lengthy culturing methods which may also fail to identify the presence of bacteria. While newer costly bacterial identification methods are being explored, a simple and inexpensive diagnostic tool would aid in immediate and accurate treatments for bacterial infections. Histologically, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Gram stains have been employed, but are far from optimal when analyzing tissue samples due to non-specific staining. The goal of the current study was to develop a modification of the Gram stain that enhances the contrast between bacteria and host tissue. FINDINGS: A modified Gram stain was developed and tested as an alternative to Gram stain that improves the contrast between Gram positive bacteria, Gram negative bacteria and host tissue. Initially, clinically relevant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were visualized in vitro and in biopsies of infected, porcine burns using routine Gram stain, and immunohistochemistry techniques involving bacterial strain-specific fluorescent antibodies as validation tools. H&E and Gram stain of serial biopsy sections were then compared to a modification of the Gram stain incorporating a counterstain that highlights collagen found in tissue. The modified Gram stain clearly identified both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria, and when compared to H&E or Gram stain alone provided excellent contrast between bacteria and non-viable burn eschar. Moreover, when applied to surgical biopsies from patients that underwent burn debridement this technique was able to clearly detect bacterial morphology within host tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a modification of the Gram stain that provides improved contrast of Gram positive and Gram negative microorganisms within host tissue. The samples used in this study demonstrate that this staining technique has laboratory and clinical applicability. This modification only adds minutes to traditional Gram stain with reusable reagents, and results in a cost- and time-efficient technique for identifying bacteria in any clinical biopsy containing connective tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4828829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48288292016-04-13 An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue Becerra, Sandra C. Roy, Daniel C. Sanchez, Carlos J. Christy, Robert J. Burmeister, David M. BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections are a common clinical problem in both acute and chronic wounds. With growing concerns over antibiotic resistance, treatment of bacterial infections should only occur after positive diagnosis. Currently, diagnosis is delayed due to lengthy culturing methods which may also fail to identify the presence of bacteria. While newer costly bacterial identification methods are being explored, a simple and inexpensive diagnostic tool would aid in immediate and accurate treatments for bacterial infections. Histologically, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Gram stains have been employed, but are far from optimal when analyzing tissue samples due to non-specific staining. The goal of the current study was to develop a modification of the Gram stain that enhances the contrast between bacteria and host tissue. FINDINGS: A modified Gram stain was developed and tested as an alternative to Gram stain that improves the contrast between Gram positive bacteria, Gram negative bacteria and host tissue. Initially, clinically relevant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were visualized in vitro and in biopsies of infected, porcine burns using routine Gram stain, and immunohistochemistry techniques involving bacterial strain-specific fluorescent antibodies as validation tools. H&E and Gram stain of serial biopsy sections were then compared to a modification of the Gram stain incorporating a counterstain that highlights collagen found in tissue. The modified Gram stain clearly identified both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria, and when compared to H&E or Gram stain alone provided excellent contrast between bacteria and non-viable burn eschar. Moreover, when applied to surgical biopsies from patients that underwent burn debridement this technique was able to clearly detect bacterial morphology within host tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a modification of the Gram stain that provides improved contrast of Gram positive and Gram negative microorganisms within host tissue. The samples used in this study demonstrate that this staining technique has laboratory and clinical applicability. This modification only adds minutes to traditional Gram stain with reusable reagents, and results in a cost- and time-efficient technique for identifying bacteria in any clinical biopsy containing connective tissue. BioMed Central 2016-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4828829/ /pubmed/27071769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1902-0 Text en © Becerra et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Becerra, Sandra C.
Roy, Daniel C.
Sanchez, Carlos J.
Christy, Robert J.
Burmeister, David M.
An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue
title An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue
title_full An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue
title_fullStr An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue
title_full_unstemmed An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue
title_short An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue
title_sort optimized staining technique for the detection of gram positive and gram negative bacteria within tissue
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27071769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1902-0
work_keys_str_mv AT becerrasandrac anoptimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT roydanielc anoptimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT sanchezcarlosj anoptimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT christyrobertj anoptimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT burmeisterdavidm anoptimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT becerrasandrac optimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT roydanielc optimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT sanchezcarlosj optimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT christyrobertj optimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue
AT burmeisterdavidm optimizedstainingtechniqueforthedetectionofgrampositiveandgramnegativebacteriawithintissue