Cargando…

The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System

BACKGROUND: Medico-legal death investigations are a recognised data source for public health endeavours and its accessibility has increased following the development of electronic data systems. Despite time and cost savings, the strengths and limitations of this method and impact on research finding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bugeja, Lyndal, Ibrahim, Joseph E., Ferrah, Noha, Murphy, Briony, Willoughby, Melissa, Ranson, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0096-1
_version_ 1782426660101947392
author Bugeja, Lyndal
Ibrahim, Joseph E.
Ferrah, Noha
Murphy, Briony
Willoughby, Melissa
Ranson, David
author_facet Bugeja, Lyndal
Ibrahim, Joseph E.
Ferrah, Noha
Murphy, Briony
Willoughby, Melissa
Ranson, David
author_sort Bugeja, Lyndal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medico-legal death investigations are a recognised data source for public health endeavours and its accessibility has increased following the development of electronic data systems. Despite time and cost savings, the strengths and limitations of this method and impact on research findings remain untested. This study examines this issue using the National Coronial Information System (NCIS). METHODS: PubMed, ProQuest and Informit were searched to identify publications where the NCIS was used as a data source for research published during the period 2000–2014. A descriptive analysis was performed to describe the frequency and characteristics of the publications identified. A content analysis was performed to identify the nature and impact of strengths and limitations of the NCIS as reported by researchers. RESULTS: Of the 106 publications included, 30 reported strengths and limitations, 37 reported limitations only, seven reported strengths only and 32 reported neither. The impact of the reported strengths of the NCIS was described in 14 publications, whilst 46 publications discussed the impacts of limitations. The NCIS was reported to be a reliable source of quality, detailed information with comprehensive coverage of deaths of interest, making it a powerful injury surveillance tool. Despite these strengths, researchers reported that open cases and missing information created the potential for selection and reporting biases and may preclude the identification and control of confounders. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure research results are valid and inform health policy, it is essential to consider and seek to overcome the limitations of data sources that may have an impact on results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0096-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4828834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48288342016-04-13 The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System Bugeja, Lyndal Ibrahim, Joseph E. Ferrah, Noha Murphy, Briony Willoughby, Melissa Ranson, David Health Res Policy Syst Review BACKGROUND: Medico-legal death investigations are a recognised data source for public health endeavours and its accessibility has increased following the development of electronic data systems. Despite time and cost savings, the strengths and limitations of this method and impact on research findings remain untested. This study examines this issue using the National Coronial Information System (NCIS). METHODS: PubMed, ProQuest and Informit were searched to identify publications where the NCIS was used as a data source for research published during the period 2000–2014. A descriptive analysis was performed to describe the frequency and characteristics of the publications identified. A content analysis was performed to identify the nature and impact of strengths and limitations of the NCIS as reported by researchers. RESULTS: Of the 106 publications included, 30 reported strengths and limitations, 37 reported limitations only, seven reported strengths only and 32 reported neither. The impact of the reported strengths of the NCIS was described in 14 publications, whilst 46 publications discussed the impacts of limitations. The NCIS was reported to be a reliable source of quality, detailed information with comprehensive coverage of deaths of interest, making it a powerful injury surveillance tool. Despite these strengths, researchers reported that open cases and missing information created the potential for selection and reporting biases and may preclude the identification and control of confounders. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure research results are valid and inform health policy, it is essential to consider and seek to overcome the limitations of data sources that may have an impact on results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0096-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4828834/ /pubmed/27067413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0096-1 Text en © Bugeja et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Bugeja, Lyndal
Ibrahim, Joseph E.
Ferrah, Noha
Murphy, Briony
Willoughby, Melissa
Ranson, David
The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System
title The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System
title_full The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System
title_fullStr The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System
title_full_unstemmed The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System
title_short The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System
title_sort utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the national coronial information system
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0096-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bugejalyndal theutilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT ibrahimjosephe theutilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT ferrahnoha theutilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT murphybriony theutilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT willoughbymelissa theutilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT ransondavid theutilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT bugejalyndal utilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT ibrahimjosephe utilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT ferrahnoha utilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT murphybriony utilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT willoughbymelissa utilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem
AT ransondavid utilityofmedicolegaldatabasesforpublichealthresearchasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedpublicationsusingthenationalcoronialinformationsystem