Cargando…

A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds

Objective. To compare the efficacy of swabbing versus tissue biopsy for microbiological diagnosis of diabetic foot infection. Methods. This was a prospective trial. Fifty-six patients with diabetic foot infection were divided into the following 3 groups according to the PEDIS grading system: grade 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ying, Cao, Ying, Zou, Mengchen, Luo, Xiangrong, Jiang, Ya, Xue, Yaoming, Gao, Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4829715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8198714
_version_ 1782426787894001664
author Huang, Ying
Cao, Ying
Zou, Mengchen
Luo, Xiangrong
Jiang, Ya
Xue, Yaoming
Gao, Fang
author_facet Huang, Ying
Cao, Ying
Zou, Mengchen
Luo, Xiangrong
Jiang, Ya
Xue, Yaoming
Gao, Fang
author_sort Huang, Ying
collection PubMed
description Objective. To compare the efficacy of swabbing versus tissue biopsy for microbiological diagnosis of diabetic foot infection. Methods. This was a prospective trial. Fifty-six patients with diabetic foot infection were divided into the following 3 groups according to the PEDIS grading system: grade 2 (n = 10), grade 3 (n = 29), and grade 4 (n = 17). Two specimens were collected from each wound for microbial culturing after debridement, including a superficial swab and a deep tissue punch biopsy specimen. Results. Swab culturing identified all of the microorganisms isolated from the corresponding deep tissue specimens in 9/10 of grade 2 wounds (90.0%), and this proportion decreased to 12/29 (41.4%) and 7/17 (41.2%) for grades 3 and 4 wounds, respectively (p = 0.02). Moreover, the sensitivity for identifying Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli and Citrobacter, by swabbing was low (33.3%). In addition, some Gram-negative bacteria, such as Serratia and Ralstonia pickettii, were isolated from deep tissues but not from swabs. Conclusions. Swab culturing may be reliable for identification of pathogens in diabetic foot wounds classified as grade 2. However, it is advisable to culture deep tissue specimens for wounds of grade ≥3 because swab culturing is associated with a high risk of missing pathogens, especially Gram-negative bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4829715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48297152016-04-27 A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds Huang, Ying Cao, Ying Zou, Mengchen Luo, Xiangrong Jiang, Ya Xue, Yaoming Gao, Fang Int J Endocrinol Research Article Objective. To compare the efficacy of swabbing versus tissue biopsy for microbiological diagnosis of diabetic foot infection. Methods. This was a prospective trial. Fifty-six patients with diabetic foot infection were divided into the following 3 groups according to the PEDIS grading system: grade 2 (n = 10), grade 3 (n = 29), and grade 4 (n = 17). Two specimens were collected from each wound for microbial culturing after debridement, including a superficial swab and a deep tissue punch biopsy specimen. Results. Swab culturing identified all of the microorganisms isolated from the corresponding deep tissue specimens in 9/10 of grade 2 wounds (90.0%), and this proportion decreased to 12/29 (41.4%) and 7/17 (41.2%) for grades 3 and 4 wounds, respectively (p = 0.02). Moreover, the sensitivity for identifying Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli and Citrobacter, by swabbing was low (33.3%). In addition, some Gram-negative bacteria, such as Serratia and Ralstonia pickettii, were isolated from deep tissues but not from swabs. Conclusions. Swab culturing may be reliable for identification of pathogens in diabetic foot wounds classified as grade 2. However, it is advisable to culture deep tissue specimens for wounds of grade ≥3 because swab culturing is associated with a high risk of missing pathogens, especially Gram-negative bacteria. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4829715/ /pubmed/27123004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8198714 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ying Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Ying
Cao, Ying
Zou, Mengchen
Luo, Xiangrong
Jiang, Ya
Xue, Yaoming
Gao, Fang
A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds
title A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds
title_full A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds
title_fullStr A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds
title_short A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds
title_sort comparison of tissue versus swab culturing of infected diabetic foot wounds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4829715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8198714
work_keys_str_mv AT huangying acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT caoying acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT zoumengchen acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT luoxiangrong acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT jiangya acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT xueyaoming acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT gaofang acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT huangying comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT caoying comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT zoumengchen comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT luoxiangrong comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT jiangya comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT xueyaoming comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds
AT gaofang comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds