Cargando…
A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds
Objective. To compare the efficacy of swabbing versus tissue biopsy for microbiological diagnosis of diabetic foot infection. Methods. This was a prospective trial. Fifty-six patients with diabetic foot infection were divided into the following 3 groups according to the PEDIS grading system: grade 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4829715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8198714 |
_version_ | 1782426787894001664 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Ying Cao, Ying Zou, Mengchen Luo, Xiangrong Jiang, Ya Xue, Yaoming Gao, Fang |
author_facet | Huang, Ying Cao, Ying Zou, Mengchen Luo, Xiangrong Jiang, Ya Xue, Yaoming Gao, Fang |
author_sort | Huang, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. To compare the efficacy of swabbing versus tissue biopsy for microbiological diagnosis of diabetic foot infection. Methods. This was a prospective trial. Fifty-six patients with diabetic foot infection were divided into the following 3 groups according to the PEDIS grading system: grade 2 (n = 10), grade 3 (n = 29), and grade 4 (n = 17). Two specimens were collected from each wound for microbial culturing after debridement, including a superficial swab and a deep tissue punch biopsy specimen. Results. Swab culturing identified all of the microorganisms isolated from the corresponding deep tissue specimens in 9/10 of grade 2 wounds (90.0%), and this proportion decreased to 12/29 (41.4%) and 7/17 (41.2%) for grades 3 and 4 wounds, respectively (p = 0.02). Moreover, the sensitivity for identifying Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli and Citrobacter, by swabbing was low (33.3%). In addition, some Gram-negative bacteria, such as Serratia and Ralstonia pickettii, were isolated from deep tissues but not from swabs. Conclusions. Swab culturing may be reliable for identification of pathogens in diabetic foot wounds classified as grade 2. However, it is advisable to culture deep tissue specimens for wounds of grade ≥3 because swab culturing is associated with a high risk of missing pathogens, especially Gram-negative bacteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4829715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48297152016-04-27 A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds Huang, Ying Cao, Ying Zou, Mengchen Luo, Xiangrong Jiang, Ya Xue, Yaoming Gao, Fang Int J Endocrinol Research Article Objective. To compare the efficacy of swabbing versus tissue biopsy for microbiological diagnosis of diabetic foot infection. Methods. This was a prospective trial. Fifty-six patients with diabetic foot infection were divided into the following 3 groups according to the PEDIS grading system: grade 2 (n = 10), grade 3 (n = 29), and grade 4 (n = 17). Two specimens were collected from each wound for microbial culturing after debridement, including a superficial swab and a deep tissue punch biopsy specimen. Results. Swab culturing identified all of the microorganisms isolated from the corresponding deep tissue specimens in 9/10 of grade 2 wounds (90.0%), and this proportion decreased to 12/29 (41.4%) and 7/17 (41.2%) for grades 3 and 4 wounds, respectively (p = 0.02). Moreover, the sensitivity for identifying Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli and Citrobacter, by swabbing was low (33.3%). In addition, some Gram-negative bacteria, such as Serratia and Ralstonia pickettii, were isolated from deep tissues but not from swabs. Conclusions. Swab culturing may be reliable for identification of pathogens in diabetic foot wounds classified as grade 2. However, it is advisable to culture deep tissue specimens for wounds of grade ≥3 because swab culturing is associated with a high risk of missing pathogens, especially Gram-negative bacteria. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4829715/ /pubmed/27123004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8198714 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ying Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Ying Cao, Ying Zou, Mengchen Luo, Xiangrong Jiang, Ya Xue, Yaoming Gao, Fang A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds |
title | A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds |
title_full | A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds |
title_short | A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds |
title_sort | comparison of tissue versus swab culturing of infected diabetic foot wounds |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4829715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8198714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangying acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT caoying acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT zoumengchen acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT luoxiangrong acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT jiangya acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT xueyaoming acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT gaofang acomparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT huangying comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT caoying comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT zoumengchen comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT luoxiangrong comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT jiangya comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT xueyaoming comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds AT gaofang comparisonoftissueversusswabculturingofinfecteddiabeticfootwounds |