Cargando…

Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Ovarian stimulation drugs, in particular hormonal agents used for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) required to perform in vitro fertilization, increase estrogen and progesterone levels and have therefore been suspected to influence breast cancer risk. This study aims to investigate w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lundberg, Frida E., Johansson, Anna L. V., Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny, Brand, Judith S., Czene, Kamila, Hall, Per, Iliadou, Anastasia N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0693-5
_version_ 1782426839478697984
author Lundberg, Frida E.
Johansson, Anna L. V.
Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny
Brand, Judith S.
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
Iliadou, Anastasia N.
author_facet Lundberg, Frida E.
Johansson, Anna L. V.
Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny
Brand, Judith S.
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
Iliadou, Anastasia N.
author_sort Lundberg, Frida E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ovarian stimulation drugs, in particular hormonal agents used for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) required to perform in vitro fertilization, increase estrogen and progesterone levels and have therefore been suspected to influence breast cancer risk. This study aims to investigate whether infertility and hormonal fertility treatment influences mammographic density, a strong hormone-responsive risk factor for breast cancer. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including 43,313 women recruited to the Karolinska Mammography Project between 2010 and 2013. Among women who reported having had infertility, 1576 had gone through COS, 1429 had had hormonal stimulation without COS and 5958 had not received any hormonal fertility treatment. Percent and absolute mammographic densities were obtained using the volumetric method Volpara™. Associations with mammographic density were assessed using multivariable generalized linear models, estimating mean differences (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: After multivariable adjustment, women with a history of infertility had 1.53 cm(3) higher absolute dense volume compared to non-infertile women (95 % CI: 0.70 to 2.35). Among infertile women, only those who had gone through COS treatment had a higher absolute dense volume than those who had not received any hormone treatment (adjusted MD 3.22, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 5.33). No clear associations were observed between infertility, fertility treatment and percent volumetric density. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, women reporting infertility had more dense tissue in the breast. The higher absolute dense volume in women treated with COS may indicate a treatment effect, although part of the association might also be due to the underlying infertility. Continued monitoring of cancer risk in infertile women, especially those who undergo COS, is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0693-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4830010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48300102016-04-14 Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study Lundberg, Frida E. Johansson, Anna L. V. Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny Brand, Judith S. Czene, Kamila Hall, Per Iliadou, Anastasia N. Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Ovarian stimulation drugs, in particular hormonal agents used for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) required to perform in vitro fertilization, increase estrogen and progesterone levels and have therefore been suspected to influence breast cancer risk. This study aims to investigate whether infertility and hormonal fertility treatment influences mammographic density, a strong hormone-responsive risk factor for breast cancer. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including 43,313 women recruited to the Karolinska Mammography Project between 2010 and 2013. Among women who reported having had infertility, 1576 had gone through COS, 1429 had had hormonal stimulation without COS and 5958 had not received any hormonal fertility treatment. Percent and absolute mammographic densities were obtained using the volumetric method Volpara™. Associations with mammographic density were assessed using multivariable generalized linear models, estimating mean differences (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: After multivariable adjustment, women with a history of infertility had 1.53 cm(3) higher absolute dense volume compared to non-infertile women (95 % CI: 0.70 to 2.35). Among infertile women, only those who had gone through COS treatment had a higher absolute dense volume than those who had not received any hormone treatment (adjusted MD 3.22, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 5.33). No clear associations were observed between infertility, fertility treatment and percent volumetric density. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, women reporting infertility had more dense tissue in the breast. The higher absolute dense volume in women treated with COS may indicate a treatment effect, although part of the association might also be due to the underlying infertility. Continued monitoring of cancer risk in infertile women, especially those who undergo COS, is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0693-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-13 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4830010/ /pubmed/27072636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0693-5 Text en © Lundberg et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lundberg, Frida E.
Johansson, Anna L. V.
Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny
Brand, Judith S.
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
Iliadou, Anastasia N.
Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study
title Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study
title_full Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study
title_short Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study
title_sort association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0693-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lundbergfridae associationofinfertilityandfertilitytreatmentwithmammographicdensityinalargescreeningbasedcohortofwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT johanssonannalv associationofinfertilityandfertilitytreatmentwithmammographicdensityinalargescreeningbasedcohortofwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT rodriguezwallbergkenny associationofinfertilityandfertilitytreatmentwithmammographicdensityinalargescreeningbasedcohortofwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT brandjudiths associationofinfertilityandfertilitytreatmentwithmammographicdensityinalargescreeningbasedcohortofwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT czenekamila associationofinfertilityandfertilitytreatmentwithmammographicdensityinalargescreeningbasedcohortofwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT hallper associationofinfertilityandfertilitytreatmentwithmammographicdensityinalargescreeningbasedcohortofwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT iliadouanastasian associationofinfertilityandfertilitytreatmentwithmammographicdensityinalargescreeningbasedcohortofwomenacrosssectionalstudy