Cargando…

Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement

A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is a commonly used tool to assess the quality of systematic reviews; however, modifications are needed to improve its usability, reliability, and validity. In this commentary, we summarize our experience and the experiences of others who have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Burda, Brittany U., Holmer, Haley K., Norris, Susan L.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2016
Materias:	Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0237-1

Ejemplares similares

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Shea, Beverley J., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Conflict of Interest in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Systematic Review
por: Norris, Susan L., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
por: Holmer, Haley K., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Conflict of Interest Policies for Organizations Producing a Large Number of Clinical Practice Guidelines
por: Norris, Susan L., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Conflicts of Interest among Authors of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
por: Norris, Susan L., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Characteristics of physicians receiving large payments from pharmaceutical companies and the accuracy of their disclosures in publications: an observational study
por: Norris, Susan L, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2
por: Perry, R., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
por: Kang, Deying, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools
por: Perry, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
por: Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Pollock, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption
por: Bojcic, Ruzica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Abstract: Assessing Quality in Systematic Reviews: Application of AMSTAR Criteria to Plastic Surgery Literature
por: Jenny, Hillary E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR
por: Wu, Xinyu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study
por: Lu, Cuncun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Publicado: (2015)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

157: ASSESSING THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS BY AMSTAR CHECKLIST
por: Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews
por: Swierz, Mateusz J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
por: SEQUEIRA-BYRON, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Commentary on: Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Gould, Daniel J
Publicado: (2021)

User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool
por: Ho, Robin ST, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of antidepressants effect on low back pain using updated AMSTAR
por: Panahi, Mohammad Hossein, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2
por: Guan, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
por: Li, Lin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_i1l51nlim15ig74m5tuvlve6eh