Cargando…
A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability
Corals build reefs through accretion of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) skeletons, but net reef growth also depends on bioerosion by grazers and borers and on secondary calcification by crustose coralline algae and other calcifying invertebrates. However, traditional field methods for quantifying second...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153058 |
_version_ | 1782426900106313728 |
---|---|
author | Silbiger, Nyssa J. Guadayol, Òscar Thomas, Florence I. M. Donahue, Megan J. |
author_facet | Silbiger, Nyssa J. Guadayol, Òscar Thomas, Florence I. M. Donahue, Megan J. |
author_sort | Silbiger, Nyssa J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Corals build reefs through accretion of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) skeletons, but net reef growth also depends on bioerosion by grazers and borers and on secondary calcification by crustose coralline algae and other calcifying invertebrates. However, traditional field methods for quantifying secondary accretion and bioerosion confound both processes, do not measure them on the same time-scale, or are restricted to 2D methods. In a prior study, we compared multiple environmental drivers of net erosion using pre- and post-deployment micro-computed tomography scans (μCT; calculated as the % change in volume of experimental CaCO(3) blocks) and found a shift from net accretion to net erosion with increasing ocean acidity. Here, we present a novel μCT method and detail a procedure that aligns and digitally subtracts pre- and post-deployment μCT scans and measures the simultaneous response of secondary accretion and bioerosion on blocks exposed to the same environmental variation over the same time-scale. We tested our method on a dataset from a prior study and show that it can be used to uncover information previously unattainable using traditional methods. We demonstrated that secondary accretion and bioerosion are driven by different environmental parameters, bioerosion is more sensitive to ocean acidity than secondary accretion, and net erosion is driven more by changes in bioerosion than secondary accretion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4830455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48304552016-04-22 A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability Silbiger, Nyssa J. Guadayol, Òscar Thomas, Florence I. M. Donahue, Megan J. PLoS One Research Article Corals build reefs through accretion of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) skeletons, but net reef growth also depends on bioerosion by grazers and borers and on secondary calcification by crustose coralline algae and other calcifying invertebrates. However, traditional field methods for quantifying secondary accretion and bioerosion confound both processes, do not measure them on the same time-scale, or are restricted to 2D methods. In a prior study, we compared multiple environmental drivers of net erosion using pre- and post-deployment micro-computed tomography scans (μCT; calculated as the % change in volume of experimental CaCO(3) blocks) and found a shift from net accretion to net erosion with increasing ocean acidity. Here, we present a novel μCT method and detail a procedure that aligns and digitally subtracts pre- and post-deployment μCT scans and measures the simultaneous response of secondary accretion and bioerosion on blocks exposed to the same environmental variation over the same time-scale. We tested our method on a dataset from a prior study and show that it can be used to uncover information previously unattainable using traditional methods. We demonstrated that secondary accretion and bioerosion are driven by different environmental parameters, bioerosion is more sensitive to ocean acidity than secondary accretion, and net erosion is driven more by changes in bioerosion than secondary accretion. Public Library of Science 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4830455/ /pubmed/27074001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153058 Text en © 2016 Silbiger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Silbiger, Nyssa J. Guadayol, Òscar Thomas, Florence I. M. Donahue, Megan J. A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability |
title | A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability |
title_full | A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability |
title_fullStr | A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability |
title_short | A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability |
title_sort | novel μct analysis reveals different responses of bioerosion and secondary accretion to environmental variability |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silbigernyssaj anovelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability AT guadayoloscar anovelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability AT thomasflorenceim anovelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability AT donahuemeganj anovelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability AT silbigernyssaj novelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability AT guadayoloscar novelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability AT thomasflorenceim novelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability AT donahuemeganj novelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability |