Cargando…

A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability

Corals build reefs through accretion of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) skeletons, but net reef growth also depends on bioerosion by grazers and borers and on secondary calcification by crustose coralline algae and other calcifying invertebrates. However, traditional field methods for quantifying second...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silbiger, Nyssa J., Guadayol, Òscar, Thomas, Florence I. M., Donahue, Megan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153058
_version_ 1782426900106313728
author Silbiger, Nyssa J.
Guadayol, Òscar
Thomas, Florence I. M.
Donahue, Megan J.
author_facet Silbiger, Nyssa J.
Guadayol, Òscar
Thomas, Florence I. M.
Donahue, Megan J.
author_sort Silbiger, Nyssa J.
collection PubMed
description Corals build reefs through accretion of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) skeletons, but net reef growth also depends on bioerosion by grazers and borers and on secondary calcification by crustose coralline algae and other calcifying invertebrates. However, traditional field methods for quantifying secondary accretion and bioerosion confound both processes, do not measure them on the same time-scale, or are restricted to 2D methods. In a prior study, we compared multiple environmental drivers of net erosion using pre- and post-deployment micro-computed tomography scans (μCT; calculated as the % change in volume of experimental CaCO(3) blocks) and found a shift from net accretion to net erosion with increasing ocean acidity. Here, we present a novel μCT method and detail a procedure that aligns and digitally subtracts pre- and post-deployment μCT scans and measures the simultaneous response of secondary accretion and bioerosion on blocks exposed to the same environmental variation over the same time-scale. We tested our method on a dataset from a prior study and show that it can be used to uncover information previously unattainable using traditional methods. We demonstrated that secondary accretion and bioerosion are driven by different environmental parameters, bioerosion is more sensitive to ocean acidity than secondary accretion, and net erosion is driven more by changes in bioerosion than secondary accretion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4830455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48304552016-04-22 A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability Silbiger, Nyssa J. Guadayol, Òscar Thomas, Florence I. M. Donahue, Megan J. PLoS One Research Article Corals build reefs through accretion of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) skeletons, but net reef growth also depends on bioerosion by grazers and borers and on secondary calcification by crustose coralline algae and other calcifying invertebrates. However, traditional field methods for quantifying secondary accretion and bioerosion confound both processes, do not measure them on the same time-scale, or are restricted to 2D methods. In a prior study, we compared multiple environmental drivers of net erosion using pre- and post-deployment micro-computed tomography scans (μCT; calculated as the % change in volume of experimental CaCO(3) blocks) and found a shift from net accretion to net erosion with increasing ocean acidity. Here, we present a novel μCT method and detail a procedure that aligns and digitally subtracts pre- and post-deployment μCT scans and measures the simultaneous response of secondary accretion and bioerosion on blocks exposed to the same environmental variation over the same time-scale. We tested our method on a dataset from a prior study and show that it can be used to uncover information previously unattainable using traditional methods. We demonstrated that secondary accretion and bioerosion are driven by different environmental parameters, bioerosion is more sensitive to ocean acidity than secondary accretion, and net erosion is driven more by changes in bioerosion than secondary accretion. Public Library of Science 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4830455/ /pubmed/27074001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153058 Text en © 2016 Silbiger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Silbiger, Nyssa J.
Guadayol, Òscar
Thomas, Florence I. M.
Donahue, Megan J.
A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability
title A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability
title_full A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability
title_fullStr A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability
title_full_unstemmed A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability
title_short A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability
title_sort novel μct analysis reveals different responses of bioerosion and secondary accretion to environmental variability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153058
work_keys_str_mv AT silbigernyssaj anovelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability
AT guadayoloscar anovelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability
AT thomasflorenceim anovelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability
AT donahuemeganj anovelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability
AT silbigernyssaj novelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability
AT guadayoloscar novelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability
AT thomasflorenceim novelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability
AT donahuemeganj novelmctanalysisrevealsdifferentresponsesofbioerosionandsecondaryaccretiontoenvironmentalvariability