Cargando…
Vertebral body fractures of unknown origin in cancer patients receiving MDCT: reporting by radiologists and awareness by clinicians
BACKGROUND: To evaluate prevalence, radiological reporting and clinical management of pathologic vertebral body fractures (VBFs) of unknown origin in cancer patients receiving computed tomography (CT) examinations. METHODS: We investigated all CT examinations (over 1 year) of male and female patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2097-5 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: To evaluate prevalence, radiological reporting and clinical management of pathologic vertebral body fractures (VBFs) of unknown origin in cancer patients receiving computed tomography (CT) examinations. METHODS: We investigated all CT examinations (over 1 year) of male and female patients with an underlying malignancy and an increased risk of osteoporosis (age 55–79 years) for the presence of VBFs. We evaluated midline sagittal CT-reformations of the spine for prevalence, fracture type, severity and location, the accuracy and style of radiological reporting, subsequent clinical management and documentation in hospital discharge letters. RESULTS: 848 patients were investigated. We found 143 VBFs in 94 (11 %) patients. 6, 49, and 45 % were grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 fractures, respectively, while 20, 66, and 14 % were wedge, biconcave and crush fractures, respectively. 32 (34 %) radiological reports correctly classified VBFs as fractures, 25 (27 %) reports recognized VBFs, but did not type them, and VBFs were not described in 37 (39 %) reports. In 3 (3 %) patients further clinical work-up of VBFs was performed, while only 8 (9 %) hospital discharge letters contained the information of the presence of pathologic VBFs of unknown origin. CONCLUSIONS: VBFs of unknown origin appear frequently in cancer patients, however, clinical management and documentation was found in only few cases. Moreover, especially in cancer patients consistent radiological reporting of VBFs seems important, as aetiology of VBFs could be from osteoporosis, disease progression or oncological therapy, however, reporting is still performed inconsistently. |
---|