Cargando…
RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe
Personalized medicine shows promise for maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity of anti-cancer treatment. KRAS exon 2 mutations are predictive of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26573425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1876-7 |
_version_ | 1782426967244537856 |
---|---|
author | Van Krieken, J Han JM Rouleau, Etienne Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Normanno, Nicola Patterson, Scott D. Jung, Andreas |
author_facet | Van Krieken, J Han JM Rouleau, Etienne Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Normanno, Nicola Patterson, Scott D. Jung, Andreas |
author_sort | Van Krieken, J Han JM |
collection | PubMed |
description | Personalized medicine shows promise for maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity of anti-cancer treatment. KRAS exon 2 mutations are predictive of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown that broader RAS testing (KRAS and NRAS) is needed to select patients for treatment. While Sanger sequencing is still used, approaches based on various methodologies are available. Few CE-approved kits, however, detect the full spectrum of RAS mutations. More recently, “next-generation” sequencing has been developed for research use, including parallel semiconductor sequencing and reversible termination. These techniques have high technical sensitivities for detecting mutations, although the ideal threshold is currently unknown. Finally, liquid biopsy has the potential to become an additional tool to assess tumor-derived DNA. For accurate and timely RAS testing, appropriate sampling and prompt delivery of material is critical. Processes to ensure efficient turnaround from sample request to RAS evaluation must be implemented so that patients receive the most appropriate treatment. Given the variety of methodologies, external quality assurance programs are important to ensure a high standard of RAS testing. Here, we review technical and practical aspects of RAS testing for pathologists working with metastatic colorectal cancer tumor samples. The extension of markers from KRAS to RAS testing is the new paradigm for biomarker testing in colorectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4830882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48308822016-04-22 RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe Van Krieken, J Han JM Rouleau, Etienne Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Normanno, Nicola Patterson, Scott D. Jung, Andreas Virchows Arch Review and Perspectives Personalized medicine shows promise for maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity of anti-cancer treatment. KRAS exon 2 mutations are predictive of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown that broader RAS testing (KRAS and NRAS) is needed to select patients for treatment. While Sanger sequencing is still used, approaches based on various methodologies are available. Few CE-approved kits, however, detect the full spectrum of RAS mutations. More recently, “next-generation” sequencing has been developed for research use, including parallel semiconductor sequencing and reversible termination. These techniques have high technical sensitivities for detecting mutations, although the ideal threshold is currently unknown. Finally, liquid biopsy has the potential to become an additional tool to assess tumor-derived DNA. For accurate and timely RAS testing, appropriate sampling and prompt delivery of material is critical. Processes to ensure efficient turnaround from sample request to RAS evaluation must be implemented so that patients receive the most appropriate treatment. Given the variety of methodologies, external quality assurance programs are important to ensure a high standard of RAS testing. Here, we review technical and practical aspects of RAS testing for pathologists working with metastatic colorectal cancer tumor samples. The extension of markers from KRAS to RAS testing is the new paradigm for biomarker testing in colorectal cancer. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-16 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4830882/ /pubmed/26573425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1876-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review and Perspectives Van Krieken, J Han JM Rouleau, Etienne Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Normanno, Nicola Patterson, Scott D. Jung, Andreas RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe |
title | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe |
title_full | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe |
title_fullStr | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe |
title_short | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe |
title_sort | ras testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in europe |
topic | Review and Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26573425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1876-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vankriekenjhanjm rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope AT rouleauetienne rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope AT ligtenbergmarjolijnjl rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope AT normannonicola rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope AT pattersonscottd rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope AT jungandreas rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope |