Cargando…

RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe

Personalized medicine shows promise for maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity of anti-cancer treatment. KRAS exon 2 mutations are predictive of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Krieken, J Han JM, Rouleau, Etienne, Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L., Normanno, Nicola, Patterson, Scott D., Jung, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26573425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1876-7
_version_ 1782426967244537856
author Van Krieken, J Han JM
Rouleau, Etienne
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Normanno, Nicola
Patterson, Scott D.
Jung, Andreas
author_facet Van Krieken, J Han JM
Rouleau, Etienne
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Normanno, Nicola
Patterson, Scott D.
Jung, Andreas
author_sort Van Krieken, J Han JM
collection PubMed
description Personalized medicine shows promise for maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity of anti-cancer treatment. KRAS exon 2 mutations are predictive of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown that broader RAS testing (KRAS and NRAS) is needed to select patients for treatment. While Sanger sequencing is still used, approaches based on various methodologies are available. Few CE-approved kits, however, detect the full spectrum of RAS mutations. More recently, “next-generation” sequencing has been developed for research use, including parallel semiconductor sequencing and reversible termination. These techniques have high technical sensitivities for detecting mutations, although the ideal threshold is currently unknown. Finally, liquid biopsy has the potential to become an additional tool to assess tumor-derived DNA. For accurate and timely RAS testing, appropriate sampling and prompt delivery of material is critical. Processes to ensure efficient turnaround from sample request to RAS evaluation must be implemented so that patients receive the most appropriate treatment. Given the variety of methodologies, external quality assurance programs are important to ensure a high standard of RAS testing. Here, we review technical and practical aspects of RAS testing for pathologists working with metastatic colorectal cancer tumor samples. The extension of markers from KRAS to RAS testing is the new paradigm for biomarker testing in colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4830882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48308822016-04-22 RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe Van Krieken, J Han JM Rouleau, Etienne Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Normanno, Nicola Patterson, Scott D. Jung, Andreas Virchows Arch Review and Perspectives Personalized medicine shows promise for maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity of anti-cancer treatment. KRAS exon 2 mutations are predictive of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown that broader RAS testing (KRAS and NRAS) is needed to select patients for treatment. While Sanger sequencing is still used, approaches based on various methodologies are available. Few CE-approved kits, however, detect the full spectrum of RAS mutations. More recently, “next-generation” sequencing has been developed for research use, including parallel semiconductor sequencing and reversible termination. These techniques have high technical sensitivities for detecting mutations, although the ideal threshold is currently unknown. Finally, liquid biopsy has the potential to become an additional tool to assess tumor-derived DNA. For accurate and timely RAS testing, appropriate sampling and prompt delivery of material is critical. Processes to ensure efficient turnaround from sample request to RAS evaluation must be implemented so that patients receive the most appropriate treatment. Given the variety of methodologies, external quality assurance programs are important to ensure a high standard of RAS testing. Here, we review technical and practical aspects of RAS testing for pathologists working with metastatic colorectal cancer tumor samples. The extension of markers from KRAS to RAS testing is the new paradigm for biomarker testing in colorectal cancer. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-16 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4830882/ /pubmed/26573425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1876-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review and Perspectives
Van Krieken, J Han JM
Rouleau, Etienne
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Normanno, Nicola
Patterson, Scott D.
Jung, Andreas
RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe
title RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe
title_full RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe
title_fullStr RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe
title_full_unstemmed RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe
title_short RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe
title_sort ras testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in europe
topic Review and Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26573425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1876-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vankriekenjhanjm rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope
AT rouleauetienne rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope
AT ligtenbergmarjolijnjl rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope
AT normannonicola rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope
AT pattersonscottd rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope
AT jungandreas rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcanceradvancesineurope