Cargando…

Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is a valid alternative to face-to-face patient care in many areas. However, the opinion of all stakeholders is decisive for successful adoption of this technique, especially as telemedicine expands into novel domains such as emergency teleconsultations during ambulance trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis, De Smedt, Ann, Guldolf, Kaat, Vandervorst, Fenne, Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan, Fernandez Tellez, Helio, Desmaele, Sara, Cambron, Melissa, Hubloue, Ives, Brouns, Raf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27029999
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.5015
_version_ 1782426971389558784
author Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis
De Smedt, Ann
Guldolf, Kaat
Vandervorst, Fenne
Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan
Fernandez Tellez, Helio
Desmaele, Sara
Cambron, Melissa
Hubloue, Ives
Brouns, Raf
author_facet Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis
De Smedt, Ann
Guldolf, Kaat
Vandervorst, Fenne
Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan
Fernandez Tellez, Helio
Desmaele, Sara
Cambron, Melissa
Hubloue, Ives
Brouns, Raf
author_sort Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is a valid alternative to face-to-face patient care in many areas. However, the opinion of all stakeholders is decisive for successful adoption of this technique, especially as telemedicine expands into novel domains such as emergency teleconsultations during ambulance transportation and chronic care at home. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the viewpoints of the broad public, patients, and professional caregivers in these situations. METHODS: A 10-question survey was developed and obtained via face-to-face interviews of visitors at the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB). The online questionnaire was also distributed among professional caregivers via the intranet of the UZB and among the broad public using social media. RESULTS: In total, 607 individuals responded to the questionnaire, expressing a positive opinion regarding telemedicine for in-ambulance emergency treatment and for chronic care at home. Privacy issues were not perceived as relevant, and most respondents were ready to participate in future teleconsultations. Lack of telecommunication knowledge (213/566, 37.6%) was the only independent factor associated with rejection of telemedicine at home and respondents via social media (250/607, 41.2%) were less concerned about privacy issues than respondents via face-to-face interviews (visitors, 234/607, 38.6%). The visitors were more positive towards in-ambulance telemedicine and more likely to agree with future participation in teleconsultations than respondents via social media. CONCLUSIONS: The broad public, professional caregivers, and patients reported a positive attitude towards telemedicine for emergency treatment during ambulance transportation and for chronic care at home. These results support further improvement of telemedicine solutions in these domains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4830904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48309042016-05-02 Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis De Smedt, Ann Guldolf, Kaat Vandervorst, Fenne Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan Fernandez Tellez, Helio Desmaele, Sara Cambron, Melissa Hubloue, Ives Brouns, Raf Interact J Med Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is a valid alternative to face-to-face patient care in many areas. However, the opinion of all stakeholders is decisive for successful adoption of this technique, especially as telemedicine expands into novel domains such as emergency teleconsultations during ambulance transportation and chronic care at home. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the viewpoints of the broad public, patients, and professional caregivers in these situations. METHODS: A 10-question survey was developed and obtained via face-to-face interviews of visitors at the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB). The online questionnaire was also distributed among professional caregivers via the intranet of the UZB and among the broad public using social media. RESULTS: In total, 607 individuals responded to the questionnaire, expressing a positive opinion regarding telemedicine for in-ambulance emergency treatment and for chronic care at home. Privacy issues were not perceived as relevant, and most respondents were ready to participate in future teleconsultations. Lack of telecommunication knowledge (213/566, 37.6%) was the only independent factor associated with rejection of telemedicine at home and respondents via social media (250/607, 41.2%) were less concerned about privacy issues than respondents via face-to-face interviews (visitors, 234/607, 38.6%). The visitors were more positive towards in-ambulance telemedicine and more likely to agree with future participation in teleconsultations than respondents via social media. CONCLUSIONS: The broad public, professional caregivers, and patients reported a positive attitude towards telemedicine for emergency treatment during ambulance transportation and for chronic care at home. These results support further improvement of telemedicine solutions in these domains. JMIR Publications Inc. 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4830904/ /pubmed/27029999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.5015 Text en ©Alexis Valenzuela Espinoza, Ann De Smedt, Kaat Guldolf, Fenne Vandervorst, Robbert-Jan Van Hooff, Helio Fernandez Tellez, Sara Desmaele, Melissa Cambron, Ives Hubloue, Raf Brouns. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (http://www.i-jmr.org/), 30.03.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis
De Smedt, Ann
Guldolf, Kaat
Vandervorst, Fenne
Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan
Fernandez Tellez, Helio
Desmaele, Sara
Cambron, Melissa
Hubloue, Ives
Brouns, Raf
Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home
title Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home
title_full Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home
title_fullStr Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home
title_full_unstemmed Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home
title_short Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home
title_sort opinions and beliefs about telemedicine for emergency treatment during ambulance transportation and for chronic care at home
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27029999
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.5015
work_keys_str_mv AT valenzuelaespinozaalexis opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT desmedtann opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT guldolfkaat opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT vandervorstfenne opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT vanhooffrobbertjan opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT fernandeztellezhelio opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT desmaelesara opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT cambronmelissa opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT hubloueives opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome
AT brounsraf opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome