Cargando…
Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home
BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is a valid alternative to face-to-face patient care in many areas. However, the opinion of all stakeholders is decisive for successful adoption of this technique, especially as telemedicine expands into novel domains such as emergency teleconsultations during ambulance trans...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27029999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.5015 |
_version_ | 1782426971389558784 |
---|---|
author | Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis De Smedt, Ann Guldolf, Kaat Vandervorst, Fenne Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan Fernandez Tellez, Helio Desmaele, Sara Cambron, Melissa Hubloue, Ives Brouns, Raf |
author_facet | Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis De Smedt, Ann Guldolf, Kaat Vandervorst, Fenne Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan Fernandez Tellez, Helio Desmaele, Sara Cambron, Melissa Hubloue, Ives Brouns, Raf |
author_sort | Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is a valid alternative to face-to-face patient care in many areas. However, the opinion of all stakeholders is decisive for successful adoption of this technique, especially as telemedicine expands into novel domains such as emergency teleconsultations during ambulance transportation and chronic care at home. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the viewpoints of the broad public, patients, and professional caregivers in these situations. METHODS: A 10-question survey was developed and obtained via face-to-face interviews of visitors at the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB). The online questionnaire was also distributed among professional caregivers via the intranet of the UZB and among the broad public using social media. RESULTS: In total, 607 individuals responded to the questionnaire, expressing a positive opinion regarding telemedicine for in-ambulance emergency treatment and for chronic care at home. Privacy issues were not perceived as relevant, and most respondents were ready to participate in future teleconsultations. Lack of telecommunication knowledge (213/566, 37.6%) was the only independent factor associated with rejection of telemedicine at home and respondents via social media (250/607, 41.2%) were less concerned about privacy issues than respondents via face-to-face interviews (visitors, 234/607, 38.6%). The visitors were more positive towards in-ambulance telemedicine and more likely to agree with future participation in teleconsultations than respondents via social media. CONCLUSIONS: The broad public, professional caregivers, and patients reported a positive attitude towards telemedicine for emergency treatment during ambulance transportation and for chronic care at home. These results support further improvement of telemedicine solutions in these domains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4830904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48309042016-05-02 Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis De Smedt, Ann Guldolf, Kaat Vandervorst, Fenne Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan Fernandez Tellez, Helio Desmaele, Sara Cambron, Melissa Hubloue, Ives Brouns, Raf Interact J Med Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is a valid alternative to face-to-face patient care in many areas. However, the opinion of all stakeholders is decisive for successful adoption of this technique, especially as telemedicine expands into novel domains such as emergency teleconsultations during ambulance transportation and chronic care at home. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the viewpoints of the broad public, patients, and professional caregivers in these situations. METHODS: A 10-question survey was developed and obtained via face-to-face interviews of visitors at the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB). The online questionnaire was also distributed among professional caregivers via the intranet of the UZB and among the broad public using social media. RESULTS: In total, 607 individuals responded to the questionnaire, expressing a positive opinion regarding telemedicine for in-ambulance emergency treatment and for chronic care at home. Privacy issues were not perceived as relevant, and most respondents were ready to participate in future teleconsultations. Lack of telecommunication knowledge (213/566, 37.6%) was the only independent factor associated with rejection of telemedicine at home and respondents via social media (250/607, 41.2%) were less concerned about privacy issues than respondents via face-to-face interviews (visitors, 234/607, 38.6%). The visitors were more positive towards in-ambulance telemedicine and more likely to agree with future participation in teleconsultations than respondents via social media. CONCLUSIONS: The broad public, professional caregivers, and patients reported a positive attitude towards telemedicine for emergency treatment during ambulance transportation and for chronic care at home. These results support further improvement of telemedicine solutions in these domains. JMIR Publications Inc. 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4830904/ /pubmed/27029999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.5015 Text en ©Alexis Valenzuela Espinoza, Ann De Smedt, Kaat Guldolf, Fenne Vandervorst, Robbert-Jan Van Hooff, Helio Fernandez Tellez, Sara Desmaele, Melissa Cambron, Ives Hubloue, Raf Brouns. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (http://www.i-jmr.org/), 30.03.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Valenzuela Espinoza, Alexis De Smedt, Ann Guldolf, Kaat Vandervorst, Fenne Van Hooff, Robbert-Jan Fernandez Tellez, Helio Desmaele, Sara Cambron, Melissa Hubloue, Ives Brouns, Raf Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home |
title | Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home |
title_full | Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home |
title_fullStr | Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home |
title_full_unstemmed | Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home |
title_short | Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home |
title_sort | opinions and beliefs about telemedicine for emergency treatment during ambulance transportation and for chronic care at home |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27029999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.5015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valenzuelaespinozaalexis opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT desmedtann opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT guldolfkaat opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT vandervorstfenne opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT vanhooffrobbertjan opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT fernandeztellezhelio opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT desmaelesara opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT cambronmelissa opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT hubloueives opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome AT brounsraf opinionsandbeliefsabouttelemedicineforemergencytreatmentduringambulancetransportationandforchroniccareathome |