Cargando…
Malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology
BACKGROUND: The malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies (sensu lato) is an important malaria vector in Southeast Asia which comprises of five sibling species namely A, B, C, D and E. However, only a few forms have been identified as malaria vectors in various endemic countries. Currently, for the firs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27075571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1478-5 |
_version_ | 1782427021071089664 |
---|---|
author | Tyagi, Varun Sharma, A. K. Dhiman, Sunil Srivastava, A. R. Yadav, Ruchi Sukumaran, D. Agrawal, O. P. Veer, Vijay |
author_facet | Tyagi, Varun Sharma, A. K. Dhiman, Sunil Srivastava, A. R. Yadav, Ruchi Sukumaran, D. Agrawal, O. P. Veer, Vijay |
author_sort | Tyagi, Varun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies (sensu lato) is an important malaria vector in Southeast Asia which comprises of five sibling species namely A, B, C, D and E. However, only a few forms have been identified as malaria vectors in various endemic countries. Currently, for the first time egg morphometry and morphology has been used to differentiate the three known vector sibling species of Anopheles culicifacies collected from malaria endemic Madhya Pradesh state of central India. METHODS: The adult An. culicifacies (s.l.) was collected from five districts using standard mosquito collection methods. Adult female mosquitoes were allowed to lay eggs individually. The emerged mosquitoes were identified using allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) to sibling species. Eggs of sibling species A, D and E were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphometric and morphological characteristics. RESULTS: Currently AS-PCR identified four known sibling species (B, C, D and E) of An. culicifacies in the study area. The surface morphology and morphometric attributes of the sibling species A, D and E eggs considerably differed from each other. An. culicifacies E had a narrow deck as compared to A and D, while An. culicifacies A had a bigger micropyle with 6–7 sectors as compared to D and E that had 6 sectors. An. culicifacies D had the smallest float (the structure present on sides of the egg surface in which air is filled that help in floating) and the number of ribs was also fewer than for An. culicifacies A and E. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides the first evidence that in addition to PCR assay, sibling species of An. culicifacies can also be differentiated using morphological and morphometric characteristics of the egg stage. The results also advocate that the sibling species of An. culicifacies are morphologically dissimilar and can be resolved using advanced microscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4831176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48311762016-04-15 Malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology Tyagi, Varun Sharma, A. K. Dhiman, Sunil Srivastava, A. R. Yadav, Ruchi Sukumaran, D. Agrawal, O. P. Veer, Vijay Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies (sensu lato) is an important malaria vector in Southeast Asia which comprises of five sibling species namely A, B, C, D and E. However, only a few forms have been identified as malaria vectors in various endemic countries. Currently, for the first time egg morphometry and morphology has been used to differentiate the three known vector sibling species of Anopheles culicifacies collected from malaria endemic Madhya Pradesh state of central India. METHODS: The adult An. culicifacies (s.l.) was collected from five districts using standard mosquito collection methods. Adult female mosquitoes were allowed to lay eggs individually. The emerged mosquitoes were identified using allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) to sibling species. Eggs of sibling species A, D and E were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphometric and morphological characteristics. RESULTS: Currently AS-PCR identified four known sibling species (B, C, D and E) of An. culicifacies in the study area. The surface morphology and morphometric attributes of the sibling species A, D and E eggs considerably differed from each other. An. culicifacies E had a narrow deck as compared to A and D, while An. culicifacies A had a bigger micropyle with 6–7 sectors as compared to D and E that had 6 sectors. An. culicifacies D had the smallest float (the structure present on sides of the egg surface in which air is filled that help in floating) and the number of ribs was also fewer than for An. culicifacies A and E. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides the first evidence that in addition to PCR assay, sibling species of An. culicifacies can also be differentiated using morphological and morphometric characteristics of the egg stage. The results also advocate that the sibling species of An. culicifacies are morphologically dissimilar and can be resolved using advanced microscopy. BioMed Central 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4831176/ /pubmed/27075571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1478-5 Text en © Tyagi et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tyagi, Varun Sharma, A. K. Dhiman, Sunil Srivastava, A. R. Yadav, Ruchi Sukumaran, D. Agrawal, O. P. Veer, Vijay Malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology |
title | Malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology |
title_full | Malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology |
title_fullStr | Malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology |
title_full_unstemmed | Malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology |
title_short | Malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology |
title_sort | malaria vector anopheles culicifacies sibling species differentiation using egg morphometry and morphology |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27075571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1478-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tyagivarun malariavectoranophelesculicifaciessiblingspeciesdifferentiationusingeggmorphometryandmorphology AT sharmaak malariavectoranophelesculicifaciessiblingspeciesdifferentiationusingeggmorphometryandmorphology AT dhimansunil malariavectoranophelesculicifaciessiblingspeciesdifferentiationusingeggmorphometryandmorphology AT srivastavaar malariavectoranophelesculicifaciessiblingspeciesdifferentiationusingeggmorphometryandmorphology AT yadavruchi malariavectoranophelesculicifaciessiblingspeciesdifferentiationusingeggmorphometryandmorphology AT sukumarand malariavectoranophelesculicifaciessiblingspeciesdifferentiationusingeggmorphometryandmorphology AT agrawalop malariavectoranophelesculicifaciessiblingspeciesdifferentiationusingeggmorphometryandmorphology AT veervijay malariavectoranophelesculicifaciessiblingspeciesdifferentiationusingeggmorphometryandmorphology |