Cargando…

Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference

Prevalence of disease in wildlife populations, which is necessary for developing disease models and conducting epidemiologic analyses, is often understudied. Laboratory tests used to screen for diseases in wildlife populations often are validated only for domestic animals. Consequently, the use of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreno‐Torres, Karla, Wolfe, Barbara, Saville, William, Garabed, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2050
_version_ 1782427072861306880
author Moreno‐Torres, Karla
Wolfe, Barbara
Saville, William
Garabed, Rebecca
author_facet Moreno‐Torres, Karla
Wolfe, Barbara
Saville, William
Garabed, Rebecca
author_sort Moreno‐Torres, Karla
collection PubMed
description Prevalence of disease in wildlife populations, which is necessary for developing disease models and conducting epidemiologic analyses, is often understudied. Laboratory tests used to screen for diseases in wildlife populations often are validated only for domestic animals. Consequently, the use of these tests for wildlife populations may lead to inaccurate estimates of disease prevalence. We demonstrate the use of Bayesian latent class analysis (LCA) in determining the specificity and sensitivity of a competitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA; VMRD (®), Inc.) serologic test used to identify exposure to Neospora caninum (hereafter N. caninum) in three wildlife populations in southeastern Ohio, USA. True prevalence of N. caninum exposure in these populations was estimated to range from 0.1% to 3.1% in American bison (Bison bison), 51.0% to 53.8% in Père David's deer (Elaphurus davidianus), and 40.0% to 45.9% in white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). The accuracy of the cELISA in American bison and Père David's deer was estimated to be close to the 96% sensitivity and 99% specificity reported by the manufacturer. Sensitivity in white‐tailed deer, however, ranged from 78.9% to 99.9%. Apparent prevalence of N. caninum from the test results is not equal to the true prevalence in white‐tailed deer and Père David's deer populations. Even when these species inhabit the same community, the true prevalence in the two deer populations differed from the true prevalence in the American bison population. Variances in prevalence for some species suggest differences in the epidemiology of N. caninum for these colocated populations. Bayesian LCA methods could be used as in this example to overcome some of the constraints on validating tests in wildlife species. The ability to accurately evaluate disease status and prevalence in a population improves our understanding of the epidemiology of multihost pathogen systems at the community level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4831453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48314532016-04-20 Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference Moreno‐Torres, Karla Wolfe, Barbara Saville, William Garabed, Rebecca Ecol Evol Original Research Prevalence of disease in wildlife populations, which is necessary for developing disease models and conducting epidemiologic analyses, is often understudied. Laboratory tests used to screen for diseases in wildlife populations often are validated only for domestic animals. Consequently, the use of these tests for wildlife populations may lead to inaccurate estimates of disease prevalence. We demonstrate the use of Bayesian latent class analysis (LCA) in determining the specificity and sensitivity of a competitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA; VMRD (®), Inc.) serologic test used to identify exposure to Neospora caninum (hereafter N. caninum) in three wildlife populations in southeastern Ohio, USA. True prevalence of N. caninum exposure in these populations was estimated to range from 0.1% to 3.1% in American bison (Bison bison), 51.0% to 53.8% in Père David's deer (Elaphurus davidianus), and 40.0% to 45.9% in white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). The accuracy of the cELISA in American bison and Père David's deer was estimated to be close to the 96% sensitivity and 99% specificity reported by the manufacturer. Sensitivity in white‐tailed deer, however, ranged from 78.9% to 99.9%. Apparent prevalence of N. caninum from the test results is not equal to the true prevalence in white‐tailed deer and Père David's deer populations. Even when these species inhabit the same community, the true prevalence in the two deer populations differed from the true prevalence in the American bison population. Variances in prevalence for some species suggest differences in the epidemiology of N. caninum for these colocated populations. Bayesian LCA methods could be used as in this example to overcome some of the constraints on validating tests in wildlife species. The ability to accurately evaluate disease status and prevalence in a population improves our understanding of the epidemiology of multihost pathogen systems at the community level. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4831453/ /pubmed/27099713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2050 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Moreno‐Torres, Karla
Wolfe, Barbara
Saville, William
Garabed, Rebecca
Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference
title Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference
title_full Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference
title_fullStr Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference
title_short Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference
title_sort estimating neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using bayesian inference
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2050
work_keys_str_mv AT morenotorreskarla estimatingneosporacaninumprevalenceinwildlifepopulationsusingbayesianinference
AT wolfebarbara estimatingneosporacaninumprevalenceinwildlifepopulationsusingbayesianinference
AT savillewilliam estimatingneosporacaninumprevalenceinwildlifepopulationsusingbayesianinference
AT garabedrebecca estimatingneosporacaninumprevalenceinwildlifepopulationsusingbayesianinference