Cargando…

Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has witnessed rapid advancements, the latest being ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP), which makes the use of 11–13F sheaths as compared to 24–30F sizes used in conventional PCNL. This miniaturization aims to reduce morbidity and improve p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Madhu Sudan, Agarwal, Ketan, Jindal, Tarun, Sharma, Manoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127356
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.174778
_version_ 1782427087457484800
author Agrawal, Madhu Sudan
Agarwal, Ketan
Jindal, Tarun
Sharma, Manoj
author_facet Agrawal, Madhu Sudan
Agarwal, Ketan
Jindal, Tarun
Sharma, Manoj
author_sort Agrawal, Madhu Sudan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has witnessed rapid advancements, the latest being ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP), which makes the use of 11–13F sheaths as compared to 24–30F sizes used in conventional PCNL. This miniaturization aims to reduce morbidity and improve patient outcomes. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of UMP and report our ourtcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients underwent UMP from July 2012 to March 2014. These patients had a single unilateral renal stone measuring between 8 and 20 mm. All patients underwent UMP using a 3F nephroscope, 7.5F inner sheath, and 11F or 13F outer metallic cannula, which served as the Amplatz sheath. Stone fragmentation and clearance were achieved with holmium laser. No nephrostomy or stent was used routinely. RESULTS: Complete stone fragmentation was achieved in 114 out of 120 patients (95%) using UMP; whereas the remaining 6 were converted into mini-PCNL using a 12.5F nephroscope and 15F Amplatz sheath. The mean operative time was 39.7 ± 15.4 min, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 22.3 ± 2.2 h. Postoperatively, 6 (5%) patients had residual fragments measuring ≤4 mm. At the 2 weeks follow-up, the stone-free status was >99% (119/120). There were no significant postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows UMP to be an effective and safe procedure for managing stones up to 20 mm. This procedure offers an attractive alternative to shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for managing small stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4831502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48315022016-04-28 Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal Agrawal, Madhu Sudan Agarwal, Ketan Jindal, Tarun Sharma, Manoj Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has witnessed rapid advancements, the latest being ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP), which makes the use of 11–13F sheaths as compared to 24–30F sizes used in conventional PCNL. This miniaturization aims to reduce morbidity and improve patient outcomes. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of UMP and report our ourtcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients underwent UMP from July 2012 to March 2014. These patients had a single unilateral renal stone measuring between 8 and 20 mm. All patients underwent UMP using a 3F nephroscope, 7.5F inner sheath, and 11F or 13F outer metallic cannula, which served as the Amplatz sheath. Stone fragmentation and clearance were achieved with holmium laser. No nephrostomy or stent was used routinely. RESULTS: Complete stone fragmentation was achieved in 114 out of 120 patients (95%) using UMP; whereas the remaining 6 were converted into mini-PCNL using a 12.5F nephroscope and 15F Amplatz sheath. The mean operative time was 39.7 ± 15.4 min, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 22.3 ± 2.2 h. Postoperatively, 6 (5%) patients had residual fragments measuring ≤4 mm. At the 2 weeks follow-up, the stone-free status was >99% (119/120). There were no significant postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows UMP to be an effective and safe procedure for managing stones up to 20 mm. This procedure offers an attractive alternative to shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for managing small stones. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4831502/ /pubmed/27127356 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.174778 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agrawal, Madhu Sudan
Agarwal, Ketan
Jindal, Tarun
Sharma, Manoj
Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal
title Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal
title_full Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal
title_fullStr Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal
title_full_unstemmed Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal
title_short Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal
title_sort ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127356
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.174778
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalmadhusudan ultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyaminimallyinvasiveoptionforpercutaneousstoneremoval
AT agarwalketan ultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyaminimallyinvasiveoptionforpercutaneousstoneremoval
AT jindaltarun ultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyaminimallyinvasiveoptionforpercutaneousstoneremoval
AT sharmamanoj ultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyaminimallyinvasiveoptionforpercutaneousstoneremoval