Cargando…
Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has witnessed rapid advancements, the latest being ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP), which makes the use of 11–13F sheaths as compared to 24–30F sizes used in conventional PCNL. This miniaturization aims to reduce morbidity and improve p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127356 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.174778 |
_version_ | 1782427087457484800 |
---|---|
author | Agrawal, Madhu Sudan Agarwal, Ketan Jindal, Tarun Sharma, Manoj |
author_facet | Agrawal, Madhu Sudan Agarwal, Ketan Jindal, Tarun Sharma, Manoj |
author_sort | Agrawal, Madhu Sudan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has witnessed rapid advancements, the latest being ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP), which makes the use of 11–13F sheaths as compared to 24–30F sizes used in conventional PCNL. This miniaturization aims to reduce morbidity and improve patient outcomes. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of UMP and report our ourtcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients underwent UMP from July 2012 to March 2014. These patients had a single unilateral renal stone measuring between 8 and 20 mm. All patients underwent UMP using a 3F nephroscope, 7.5F inner sheath, and 11F or 13F outer metallic cannula, which served as the Amplatz sheath. Stone fragmentation and clearance were achieved with holmium laser. No nephrostomy or stent was used routinely. RESULTS: Complete stone fragmentation was achieved in 114 out of 120 patients (95%) using UMP; whereas the remaining 6 were converted into mini-PCNL using a 12.5F nephroscope and 15F Amplatz sheath. The mean operative time was 39.7 ± 15.4 min, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 22.3 ± 2.2 h. Postoperatively, 6 (5%) patients had residual fragments measuring ≤4 mm. At the 2 weeks follow-up, the stone-free status was >99% (119/120). There were no significant postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows UMP to be an effective and safe procedure for managing stones up to 20 mm. This procedure offers an attractive alternative to shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for managing small stones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4831502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48315022016-04-28 Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal Agrawal, Madhu Sudan Agarwal, Ketan Jindal, Tarun Sharma, Manoj Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has witnessed rapid advancements, the latest being ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP), which makes the use of 11–13F sheaths as compared to 24–30F sizes used in conventional PCNL. This miniaturization aims to reduce morbidity and improve patient outcomes. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of UMP and report our ourtcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients underwent UMP from July 2012 to March 2014. These patients had a single unilateral renal stone measuring between 8 and 20 mm. All patients underwent UMP using a 3F nephroscope, 7.5F inner sheath, and 11F or 13F outer metallic cannula, which served as the Amplatz sheath. Stone fragmentation and clearance were achieved with holmium laser. No nephrostomy or stent was used routinely. RESULTS: Complete stone fragmentation was achieved in 114 out of 120 patients (95%) using UMP; whereas the remaining 6 were converted into mini-PCNL using a 12.5F nephroscope and 15F Amplatz sheath. The mean operative time was 39.7 ± 15.4 min, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 22.3 ± 2.2 h. Postoperatively, 6 (5%) patients had residual fragments measuring ≤4 mm. At the 2 weeks follow-up, the stone-free status was >99% (119/120). There were no significant postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows UMP to be an effective and safe procedure for managing stones up to 20 mm. This procedure offers an attractive alternative to shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for managing small stones. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4831502/ /pubmed/27127356 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.174778 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Agrawal, Madhu Sudan Agarwal, Ketan Jindal, Tarun Sharma, Manoj Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal |
title | Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal |
title_full | Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal |
title_fullStr | Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal |
title_short | Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal |
title_sort | ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127356 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.174778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agrawalmadhusudan ultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyaminimallyinvasiveoptionforpercutaneousstoneremoval AT agarwalketan ultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyaminimallyinvasiveoptionforpercutaneousstoneremoval AT jindaltarun ultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyaminimallyinvasiveoptionforpercutaneousstoneremoval AT sharmamanoj ultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyaminimallyinvasiveoptionforpercutaneousstoneremoval |