Cargando…

Optimized Fluoroscopy Setting and Appropriate Project Position Can Reduce X-ray Radiation Doses Rates during Electrophysiology Procedures

BACKGROUND: Nonfluoroscopic three-dimensional electroanatomical system is widely used nowadays, but X-ray remains indispensable for complex electrophysiology procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the value of optimized parameter setting and different projection position to reduce X-ray radiation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Bing-Bo, Yao, Yan, Wu, Ling-Min, Qiao, Yu, Zheng, Li-Hui, Ding, Li-Gang, Chen, Gang, Zhang, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25947395
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.156079
_version_ 1782427096223580160
author Hou, Bing-Bo
Yao, Yan
Wu, Ling-Min
Qiao, Yu
Zheng, Li-Hui
Ding, Li-Gang
Chen, Gang
Zhang, Shu
author_facet Hou, Bing-Bo
Yao, Yan
Wu, Ling-Min
Qiao, Yu
Zheng, Li-Hui
Ding, Li-Gang
Chen, Gang
Zhang, Shu
author_sort Hou, Bing-Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonfluoroscopic three-dimensional electroanatomical system is widely used nowadays, but X-ray remains indispensable for complex electrophysiology procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the value of optimized parameter setting and different projection position to reduce X-ray radiation dose rates. METHODS: From June 2013 to October 2013, 105 consecutive patients who underwent complex ablation were enrolled in the study. After the ablation, the radiation dose rates were measured by two different settings (default setting and optimized setting) with three projection positions (posteroanterior [PA] projection; left anterior oblique [LAO] 30° projection; and LAO 45° projection). The parameter of preset voltage, pulse width, critical voltage, peak voltage, noise reduction, edge enhancement, pulse rate, and dose per frame was modified in the optimized setting. RESULTS: The optimized setting reduced radiation dose rates by 87.5% (1.7 Gy/min vs. 13.6 Gy/min, P < 0.001) in PA, 87.3% (2.5 Gy/min vs. 19.7 Gy/min, P < 0.001) in LAO 30°, 85.9% (3.1 Gy/min vs. 22.1 Gy/min, P < 0.001) in LAO 45°. Increase the angle of projection position will increase the radiation dose rate. CONCLUSIONS: We can reduce X-ray radiation dose rates by adjusting the parameter setting of X-ray system. Avoiding oblique projection of large angle is another way to reduce X-ray radiation dose rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4831539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48315392016-04-28 Optimized Fluoroscopy Setting and Appropriate Project Position Can Reduce X-ray Radiation Doses Rates during Electrophysiology Procedures Hou, Bing-Bo Yao, Yan Wu, Ling-Min Qiao, Yu Zheng, Li-Hui Ding, Li-Gang Chen, Gang Zhang, Shu Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Nonfluoroscopic three-dimensional electroanatomical system is widely used nowadays, but X-ray remains indispensable for complex electrophysiology procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the value of optimized parameter setting and different projection position to reduce X-ray radiation dose rates. METHODS: From June 2013 to October 2013, 105 consecutive patients who underwent complex ablation were enrolled in the study. After the ablation, the radiation dose rates were measured by two different settings (default setting and optimized setting) with three projection positions (posteroanterior [PA] projection; left anterior oblique [LAO] 30° projection; and LAO 45° projection). The parameter of preset voltage, pulse width, critical voltage, peak voltage, noise reduction, edge enhancement, pulse rate, and dose per frame was modified in the optimized setting. RESULTS: The optimized setting reduced radiation dose rates by 87.5% (1.7 Gy/min vs. 13.6 Gy/min, P < 0.001) in PA, 87.3% (2.5 Gy/min vs. 19.7 Gy/min, P < 0.001) in LAO 30°, 85.9% (3.1 Gy/min vs. 22.1 Gy/min, P < 0.001) in LAO 45°. Increase the angle of projection position will increase the radiation dose rate. CONCLUSIONS: We can reduce X-ray radiation dose rates by adjusting the parameter setting of X-ray system. Avoiding oblique projection of large angle is another way to reduce X-ray radiation dose rates. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4831539/ /pubmed/25947395 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.156079 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hou, Bing-Bo
Yao, Yan
Wu, Ling-Min
Qiao, Yu
Zheng, Li-Hui
Ding, Li-Gang
Chen, Gang
Zhang, Shu
Optimized Fluoroscopy Setting and Appropriate Project Position Can Reduce X-ray Radiation Doses Rates during Electrophysiology Procedures
title Optimized Fluoroscopy Setting and Appropriate Project Position Can Reduce X-ray Radiation Doses Rates during Electrophysiology Procedures
title_full Optimized Fluoroscopy Setting and Appropriate Project Position Can Reduce X-ray Radiation Doses Rates during Electrophysiology Procedures
title_fullStr Optimized Fluoroscopy Setting and Appropriate Project Position Can Reduce X-ray Radiation Doses Rates during Electrophysiology Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Optimized Fluoroscopy Setting and Appropriate Project Position Can Reduce X-ray Radiation Doses Rates during Electrophysiology Procedures
title_short Optimized Fluoroscopy Setting and Appropriate Project Position Can Reduce X-ray Radiation Doses Rates during Electrophysiology Procedures
title_sort optimized fluoroscopy setting and appropriate project position can reduce x-ray radiation doses rates during electrophysiology procedures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25947395
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.156079
work_keys_str_mv AT houbingbo optimizedfluoroscopysettingandappropriateprojectpositioncanreducexrayradiationdosesratesduringelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT yaoyan optimizedfluoroscopysettingandappropriateprojectpositioncanreducexrayradiationdosesratesduringelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT wulingmin optimizedfluoroscopysettingandappropriateprojectpositioncanreducexrayradiationdosesratesduringelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT qiaoyu optimizedfluoroscopysettingandappropriateprojectpositioncanreducexrayradiationdosesratesduringelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT zhenglihui optimizedfluoroscopysettingandappropriateprojectpositioncanreducexrayradiationdosesratesduringelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT dingligang optimizedfluoroscopysettingandappropriateprojectpositioncanreducexrayradiationdosesratesduringelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT chengang optimizedfluoroscopysettingandappropriateprojectpositioncanreducexrayradiationdosesratesduringelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT zhangshu optimizedfluoroscopysettingandappropriateprojectpositioncanreducexrayradiationdosesratesduringelectrophysiologyprocedures