Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide has emerged as an important treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, its role in the management of MM is still controversial and requires further clarification. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of lenalidomide for MM using a meta-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiao, Shu-Kai, Guo, Xiao-Nan, Ren, Jin-Hai, Ren, Han-Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25947406
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.156134
_version_ 1782427099115552768
author Qiao, Shu-Kai
Guo, Xiao-Nan
Ren, Jin-Hai
Ren, Han-Yun
author_facet Qiao, Shu-Kai
Guo, Xiao-Nan
Ren, Jin-Hai
Ren, Han-Yun
author_sort Qiao, Shu-Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide has emerged as an important treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, its role in the management of MM is still controversial and requires further clarification. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of lenalidomide for MM using a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases including: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials. Seven randomized clinical trials were identified, which included a total of 2357 patients with MM who received lenalidomide-containing, noncontaining lenalidomide regimens or placebo as induction therapy or maintenance therapy. The outcomes included overall response (OR) rate, complete response (CR) rate, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, and different types of treatment-related adverse events. We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) as well as their 95% confidence intervals of these outcomes and pooled the results using RevMan 5.2 software. RESULTS: For patients with previously untreated MM, OR rate and CR rate was significantly higher in lenalidomide-containing group than the control group. For relapsed or refractory MM patients, lenalidomide-containing regimens significantly improved the OR rate, CR rate, 3-year PFS rate and 3-year OS rate. With regard to MM patients after autologous stem cell transplantation, lenalidomide maintenance therapy significantly improved 3-year PFS rate but did not result in improved 3-year OS rate. In terms of toxicities, lenalidomide therapy has a higher rate of Grade 3–4 grade cytopenias, infection, deep-vein thrombosis, and diarrhea. Furthermore, the incidence of second primary malignancies was significantly higher in the lenalidomide group. CONCLUSIONS: The lenalidomide-containing regimens as induction therapy clearly increased response rates and improved intervals of survival with acceptable toxicity rates for patients with MM. However, when physicians choose to use the lenalidomide as maintenance therapy, whether the benefits outweigh the risks should be taken into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4831550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48315502016-04-28 Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Qiao, Shu-Kai Guo, Xiao-Nan Ren, Jin-Hai Ren, Han-Yun Chin Med J (Engl) Meta Analysis BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide has emerged as an important treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, its role in the management of MM is still controversial and requires further clarification. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of lenalidomide for MM using a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases including: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials. Seven randomized clinical trials were identified, which included a total of 2357 patients with MM who received lenalidomide-containing, noncontaining lenalidomide regimens or placebo as induction therapy or maintenance therapy. The outcomes included overall response (OR) rate, complete response (CR) rate, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, and different types of treatment-related adverse events. We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) as well as their 95% confidence intervals of these outcomes and pooled the results using RevMan 5.2 software. RESULTS: For patients with previously untreated MM, OR rate and CR rate was significantly higher in lenalidomide-containing group than the control group. For relapsed or refractory MM patients, lenalidomide-containing regimens significantly improved the OR rate, CR rate, 3-year PFS rate and 3-year OS rate. With regard to MM patients after autologous stem cell transplantation, lenalidomide maintenance therapy significantly improved 3-year PFS rate but did not result in improved 3-year OS rate. In terms of toxicities, lenalidomide therapy has a higher rate of Grade 3–4 grade cytopenias, infection, deep-vein thrombosis, and diarrhea. Furthermore, the incidence of second primary malignancies was significantly higher in the lenalidomide group. CONCLUSIONS: The lenalidomide-containing regimens as induction therapy clearly increased response rates and improved intervals of survival with acceptable toxicity rates for patients with MM. However, when physicians choose to use the lenalidomide as maintenance therapy, whether the benefits outweigh the risks should be taken into account. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4831550/ /pubmed/25947406 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.156134 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Meta Analysis
Qiao, Shu-Kai
Guo, Xiao-Nan
Ren, Jin-Hai
Ren, Han-Yun
Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Meta Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25947406
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.156134
work_keys_str_mv AT qiaoshukai efficacyandsafetyoflenalidomideinthetreatmentofmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT guoxiaonan efficacyandsafetyoflenalidomideinthetreatmentofmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT renjinhai efficacyandsafetyoflenalidomideinthetreatmentofmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT renhanyun efficacyandsafetyoflenalidomideinthetreatmentofmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials