Cargando…
Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles
Missed appointments are an avoidable cost and resource inefficiency which impact upon the health of the patient and treatment outcomes. Health care services are increasingly utilizing reminder systems to manage these negative effects. This study explores the effectiveness of reminder systems for pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110102 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S93046 |
_version_ | 1782427105229799424 |
---|---|
author | McLean, Sionnadh Mairi Booth, Andrew Gee, Melanie Salway, Sarah Cobb, Mark Bhanbhro, Sadiq Nancarrow, Susan A |
author_facet | McLean, Sionnadh Mairi Booth, Andrew Gee, Melanie Salway, Sarah Cobb, Mark Bhanbhro, Sadiq Nancarrow, Susan A |
author_sort | McLean, Sionnadh Mairi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Missed appointments are an avoidable cost and resource inefficiency which impact upon the health of the patient and treatment outcomes. Health care services are increasingly utilizing reminder systems to manage these negative effects. This study explores the effectiveness of reminder systems for promoting attendance, cancellations, and rescheduling of appointments across all health care settings and for particular patient groups and the contextual factors which indicate that reminders are being employed sub-optimally. We used three inter-related reviews of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Firstly, using pre-existing models and theories, we developed a conceptual framework to inform our understanding of the contexts and mechanisms which influence reminder effectiveness. Secondly, we performed a review following Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines to investigate the effectiveness of different methods of reminding patients to attend health service appointments. Finally, to supplement the effectiveness information, we completed a review informed by realist principles to identify factors likely to influence non-attendance behaviors and the effectiveness of reminders. We found consistent evidence that all types of reminder systems are effective at improving appointment attendance across a range of health care settings and patient populations. Reminder systems may also increase cancellation and rescheduling of unwanted appointments. “Reminder plus”, which provides additional information beyond the reminder function may be more effective than simple reminders (ie, date, time, place) at reducing non-attendance at appointments in particular circumstances. We identified six areas of inefficiency which indicate that reminder systems are being used sub-optimally. Unless otherwise indicated, all patients should receive a reminder to facilitate attendance at their health care appointment. The choice of reminder system should be tailored to the individual service. To optimize appointment and reminder systems, health care services need supportive administrative processes to enhance attendance, cancellation, rescheduling, and re-allocation of appointments to other patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4831598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48315982016-04-22 Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles McLean, Sionnadh Mairi Booth, Andrew Gee, Melanie Salway, Sarah Cobb, Mark Bhanbhro, Sadiq Nancarrow, Susan A Patient Prefer Adherence Review Missed appointments are an avoidable cost and resource inefficiency which impact upon the health of the patient and treatment outcomes. Health care services are increasingly utilizing reminder systems to manage these negative effects. This study explores the effectiveness of reminder systems for promoting attendance, cancellations, and rescheduling of appointments across all health care settings and for particular patient groups and the contextual factors which indicate that reminders are being employed sub-optimally. We used three inter-related reviews of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Firstly, using pre-existing models and theories, we developed a conceptual framework to inform our understanding of the contexts and mechanisms which influence reminder effectiveness. Secondly, we performed a review following Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines to investigate the effectiveness of different methods of reminding patients to attend health service appointments. Finally, to supplement the effectiveness information, we completed a review informed by realist principles to identify factors likely to influence non-attendance behaviors and the effectiveness of reminders. We found consistent evidence that all types of reminder systems are effective at improving appointment attendance across a range of health care settings and patient populations. Reminder systems may also increase cancellation and rescheduling of unwanted appointments. “Reminder plus”, which provides additional information beyond the reminder function may be more effective than simple reminders (ie, date, time, place) at reducing non-attendance at appointments in particular circumstances. We identified six areas of inefficiency which indicate that reminder systems are being used sub-optimally. Unless otherwise indicated, all patients should receive a reminder to facilitate attendance at their health care appointment. The choice of reminder system should be tailored to the individual service. To optimize appointment and reminder systems, health care services need supportive administrative processes to enhance attendance, cancellation, rescheduling, and re-allocation of appointments to other patients. Dove Medical Press 2016-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4831598/ /pubmed/27110102 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S93046 Text en © 2016 McLean et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review McLean, Sionnadh Mairi Booth, Andrew Gee, Melanie Salway, Sarah Cobb, Mark Bhanbhro, Sadiq Nancarrow, Susan A Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles |
title | Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles |
title_full | Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles |
title_fullStr | Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles |
title_full_unstemmed | Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles |
title_short | Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles |
title_sort | appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110102 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S93046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcleansionnadhmairi appointmentremindersystemsareeffectivebutnotoptimalresultsofasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesisemployingrealistprinciples AT boothandrew appointmentremindersystemsareeffectivebutnotoptimalresultsofasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesisemployingrealistprinciples AT geemelanie appointmentremindersystemsareeffectivebutnotoptimalresultsofasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesisemployingrealistprinciples AT salwaysarah appointmentremindersystemsareeffectivebutnotoptimalresultsofasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesisemployingrealistprinciples AT cobbmark appointmentremindersystemsareeffectivebutnotoptimalresultsofasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesisemployingrealistprinciples AT bhanbhrosadiq appointmentremindersystemsareeffectivebutnotoptimalresultsofasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesisemployingrealistprinciples AT nancarrowsusana appointmentremindersystemsareeffectivebutnotoptimalresultsofasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesisemployingrealistprinciples |