Cargando…
Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis
Background. This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of Tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate (TAED-SP) in comparison to 2.5% and 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods. A standard suspension of E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 plates containing Mueller-Hi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092214 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.007 |
_version_ | 1782427108249698304 |
---|---|
author | Shakouie, Sahar Salem Milani, Amin Eskandarnejad, Mahsa Rahimi, Saeed Froughreyhani, Mohammad Galedar, Saeede Ranjbar, Ehsan |
author_facet | Shakouie, Sahar Salem Milani, Amin Eskandarnejad, Mahsa Rahimi, Saeed Froughreyhani, Mohammad Galedar, Saeede Ranjbar, Ehsan |
author_sort | Shakouie, Sahar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of Tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate (TAED-SP) in comparison to 2.5% and 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods. A standard suspension of E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar culture medium. Four sterile disks of Beckman filtration paper were placed on each plate. TAED-SP, 5% and 2.5% NaOCl were placed on three disks. Sterile physiologic saline was placed on the fourth disk as negative control. After 24-hour incubation, the diameter of the inhibition zone around the disks was measured using a transparent ruler. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean zone of microbial growth in the groups. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. There was a significant difference in the diameter of the inhibition zones between groups (P < 0.05). The Tukey post hoc test showed a higher diameter of the inhibitory zone with TAED-SP than that of 2.5% NaOCl. However, there were no significant differences between the inhibitory zones of TAED-SP and 5% NaOCl. Conclusion. TAED-SP and 5% NaOCl have similar antibacterial activity against E. faecalis; however, TAED-SP has a greater antibacterial effect compared to 2.5% NaOCl. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4831611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48316112016-04-18 Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis Shakouie, Sahar Salem Milani, Amin Eskandarnejad, Mahsa Rahimi, Saeed Froughreyhani, Mohammad Galedar, Saeede Ranjbar, Ehsan J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of Tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate (TAED-SP) in comparison to 2.5% and 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods. A standard suspension of E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar culture medium. Four sterile disks of Beckman filtration paper were placed on each plate. TAED-SP, 5% and 2.5% NaOCl were placed on three disks. Sterile physiologic saline was placed on the fourth disk as negative control. After 24-hour incubation, the diameter of the inhibition zone around the disks was measured using a transparent ruler. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean zone of microbial growth in the groups. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. There was a significant difference in the diameter of the inhibition zones between groups (P < 0.05). The Tukey post hoc test showed a higher diameter of the inhibitory zone with TAED-SP than that of 2.5% NaOCl. However, there were no significant differences between the inhibitory zones of TAED-SP and 5% NaOCl. Conclusion. TAED-SP and 5% NaOCl have similar antibacterial activity against E. faecalis; however, TAED-SP has a greater antibacterial effect compared to 2.5% NaOCl. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2016 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4831611/ /pubmed/27092214 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.007 Text en © 2016 Shakouie et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shakouie, Sahar Salem Milani, Amin Eskandarnejad, Mahsa Rahimi, Saeed Froughreyhani, Mohammad Galedar, Saeede Ranjbar, Ehsan Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis |
title | Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_full | Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_short | Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_sort | antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against enterococcus faecalis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092214 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shakouiesahar antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT salemmilaniamin antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT eskandarnejadmahsa antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT rahimisaeed antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT froughreyhanimohammad antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT galedarsaeede antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT ranjbarehsan antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis |