Cargando…

Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis

Background. This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of Tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate (TAED-SP) in comparison to 2.5% and 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods. A standard suspension of E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 plates containing Mueller-Hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shakouie, Sahar, Salem Milani, Amin, Eskandarnejad, Mahsa, Rahimi, Saeed, Froughreyhani, Mohammad, Galedar, Saeede, Ranjbar, Ehsan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092214
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.007
_version_ 1782427108249698304
author Shakouie, Sahar
Salem Milani, Amin
Eskandarnejad, Mahsa
Rahimi, Saeed
Froughreyhani, Mohammad
Galedar, Saeede
Ranjbar, Ehsan
author_facet Shakouie, Sahar
Salem Milani, Amin
Eskandarnejad, Mahsa
Rahimi, Saeed
Froughreyhani, Mohammad
Galedar, Saeede
Ranjbar, Ehsan
author_sort Shakouie, Sahar
collection PubMed
description Background. This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of Tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate (TAED-SP) in comparison to 2.5% and 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods. A standard suspension of E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar culture medium. Four sterile disks of Beckman filtration paper were placed on each plate. TAED-SP, 5% and 2.5% NaOCl were placed on three disks. Sterile physiologic saline was placed on the fourth disk as negative control. After 24-hour incubation, the diameter of the inhibition zone around the disks was measured using a transparent ruler. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean zone of microbial growth in the groups. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. There was a significant difference in the diameter of the inhibition zones between groups (P < 0.05). The Tukey post hoc test showed a higher diameter of the inhibitory zone with TAED-SP than that of 2.5% NaOCl. However, there were no significant differences between the inhibitory zones of TAED-SP and 5% NaOCl. Conclusion. TAED-SP and 5% NaOCl have similar antibacterial activity against E. faecalis; however, TAED-SP has a greater antibacterial effect compared to 2.5% NaOCl.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4831611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48316112016-04-18 Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis Shakouie, Sahar Salem Milani, Amin Eskandarnejad, Mahsa Rahimi, Saeed Froughreyhani, Mohammad Galedar, Saeede Ranjbar, Ehsan J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of Tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate (TAED-SP) in comparison to 2.5% and 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods. A standard suspension of E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar culture medium. Four sterile disks of Beckman filtration paper were placed on each plate. TAED-SP, 5% and 2.5% NaOCl were placed on three disks. Sterile physiologic saline was placed on the fourth disk as negative control. After 24-hour incubation, the diameter of the inhibition zone around the disks was measured using a transparent ruler. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean zone of microbial growth in the groups. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. There was a significant difference in the diameter of the inhibition zones between groups (P < 0.05). The Tukey post hoc test showed a higher diameter of the inhibitory zone with TAED-SP than that of 2.5% NaOCl. However, there were no significant differences between the inhibitory zones of TAED-SP and 5% NaOCl. Conclusion. TAED-SP and 5% NaOCl have similar antibacterial activity against E. faecalis; however, TAED-SP has a greater antibacterial effect compared to 2.5% NaOCl. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2016 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4831611/ /pubmed/27092214 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.007 Text en © 2016 Shakouie et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shakouie, Sahar
Salem Milani, Amin
Eskandarnejad, Mahsa
Rahimi, Saeed
Froughreyhani, Mohammad
Galedar, Saeede
Ranjbar, Ehsan
Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis
title Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis
title_full Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis
title_fullStr Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis
title_short Antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis
title_sort antimicrobial activity of tetraacetylethylenediamine-sodium perborate versus sodium hypochlorite against enterococcus faecalis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092214
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.007
work_keys_str_mv AT shakouiesahar antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT salemmilaniamin antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT eskandarnejadmahsa antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT rahimisaeed antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT froughreyhanimohammad antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT galedarsaeede antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT ranjbarehsan antimicrobialactivityoftetraacetylethylenediaminesodiumperborateversussodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis