Cargando…

Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Among University Employees

The prevalence of overweight and obese in the U.S. has been thoroughly documented. With the advent of inactivity physiology research and the subsequent interest in sedentary behavior, the work environment has come under closer scrutiny as a potential opportunity to reverse inactivity. Therefore, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: FOUNTAINE, CHARLES J., PIACENTINI, MEREDITH, LIGUORI, GARY A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182407
_version_ 1782427148818055168
author FOUNTAINE, CHARLES J.
PIACENTINI, MEREDITH
LIGUORI, GARY A.
author_facet FOUNTAINE, CHARLES J.
PIACENTINI, MEREDITH
LIGUORI, GARY A.
author_sort FOUNTAINE, CHARLES J.
collection PubMed
description The prevalence of overweight and obese in the U.S. has been thoroughly documented. With the advent of inactivity physiology research and the subsequent interest in sedentary behavior, the work environment has come under closer scrutiny as a potential opportunity to reverse inactivity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the sitting and physical activity (PA) habits among different classifications of university employees. University employees (n=625) completed an online survey based on the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ). Participants were instructed to describe time spent sitting, standing, walking, and in heavy physical labor during the last seven days, along with the number of breaks from sitting taken per hour. To establish habitual patterns of PA outside of work, employees recalled their participation in structured PA in the past seven days. Prior to data analysis, employees were categorized as Administration, Faculty, Staff, or Facilities Management. Statistically significant differences were found among employee classifications for min sit/d, p<.001; min stand/d, p<.001; min walk/d, p<.001; and min heavy labor/d, p<.001. No significant differences were found for breaks/h from sitting, p=.259 or participation in structured PA, p=. 33. With the exception of facilities management workers, university employees spent 75% of their workday seated. In conjunction with low levels of leisure time PA, university employees appear to be prime candidates for workplace interventions to reduce physical inactivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4831850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48318502016-05-12 Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Among University Employees FOUNTAINE, CHARLES J. PIACENTINI, MEREDITH LIGUORI, GARY A. Int J Exerc Sci Original Research The prevalence of overweight and obese in the U.S. has been thoroughly documented. With the advent of inactivity physiology research and the subsequent interest in sedentary behavior, the work environment has come under closer scrutiny as a potential opportunity to reverse inactivity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the sitting and physical activity (PA) habits among different classifications of university employees. University employees (n=625) completed an online survey based on the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ). Participants were instructed to describe time spent sitting, standing, walking, and in heavy physical labor during the last seven days, along with the number of breaks from sitting taken per hour. To establish habitual patterns of PA outside of work, employees recalled their participation in structured PA in the past seven days. Prior to data analysis, employees were categorized as Administration, Faculty, Staff, or Facilities Management. Statistically significant differences were found among employee classifications for min sit/d, p<.001; min stand/d, p<.001; min walk/d, p<.001; and min heavy labor/d, p<.001. No significant differences were found for breaks/h from sitting, p=.259 or participation in structured PA, p=. 33. With the exception of facilities management workers, university employees spent 75% of their workday seated. In conjunction with low levels of leisure time PA, university employees appear to be prime candidates for workplace interventions to reduce physical inactivity. Berkeley Electronic Press 2014-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4831850/ /pubmed/27182407 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
FOUNTAINE, CHARLES J.
PIACENTINI, MEREDITH
LIGUORI, GARY A.
Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Among University Employees
title Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Among University Employees
title_full Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Among University Employees
title_fullStr Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Among University Employees
title_full_unstemmed Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Among University Employees
title_short Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Among University Employees
title_sort occupational sitting and physical activity among university employees
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182407
work_keys_str_mv AT fountainecharlesj occupationalsittingandphysicalactivityamonguniversityemployees
AT piacentinimeredith occupationalsittingandphysicalactivityamonguniversityemployees
AT liguorigarya occupationalsittingandphysicalactivityamonguniversityemployees