Cargando…
Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
Docking tools to predict whether and how a small molecule binds to a target can be applied if a structural model of such target is available. The reliability of docking depends, however, on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function (SF). Despite intense research over the years, improving the accu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1225 |
_version_ | 1782427223152656384 |
---|---|
author | Ain, Qurrat Ul Aleksandrova, Antoniya Roessler, Florian D. Ballester, Pedro J. |
author_facet | Ain, Qurrat Ul Aleksandrova, Antoniya Roessler, Florian D. Ballester, Pedro J. |
author_sort | Ain, Qurrat Ul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Docking tools to predict whether and how a small molecule binds to a target can be applied if a structural model of such target is available. The reliability of docking depends, however, on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function (SF). Despite intense research over the years, improving the accuracy of SFs for structure‐based binding affinity prediction or virtual screening has proven to be a challenging task for any class of method. New SFs based on modern machine‐learning regression models, which do not impose a predetermined functional form and thus are able to exploit effectively much larger amounts of experimental data, have recently been introduced. These machine‐learning SFs have been shown to outperform a wide range of classical SFs at both binding affinity prediction and virtual screening. The emerging picture from these studies is that the classical approach of using linear regression with a small number of expert‐selected structural features can be strongly improved by a machine‐learning approach based on nonlinear regression allied with comprehensive data‐driven feature selection. Furthermore, the performance of classical SFs does not grow with larger training datasets and hence this performance gap is expected to widen as more training data becomes available in the future. Other topics covered in this review include predicting the reliability of a SF on a particular target class, generating synthetic data to improve predictive performance and modeling guidelines for SF development. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2015, 5:405–424. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1225 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4832270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48322702016-04-20 Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening Ain, Qurrat Ul Aleksandrova, Antoniya Roessler, Florian D. Ballester, Pedro J. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci Advanced Reviews Docking tools to predict whether and how a small molecule binds to a target can be applied if a structural model of such target is available. The reliability of docking depends, however, on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function (SF). Despite intense research over the years, improving the accuracy of SFs for structure‐based binding affinity prediction or virtual screening has proven to be a challenging task for any class of method. New SFs based on modern machine‐learning regression models, which do not impose a predetermined functional form and thus are able to exploit effectively much larger amounts of experimental data, have recently been introduced. These machine‐learning SFs have been shown to outperform a wide range of classical SFs at both binding affinity prediction and virtual screening. The emerging picture from these studies is that the classical approach of using linear regression with a small number of expert‐selected structural features can be strongly improved by a machine‐learning approach based on nonlinear regression allied with comprehensive data‐driven feature selection. Furthermore, the performance of classical SFs does not grow with larger training datasets and hence this performance gap is expected to widen as more training data becomes available in the future. Other topics covered in this review include predicting the reliability of a SF on a particular target class, generating synthetic data to improve predictive performance and modeling guidelines for SF development. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2015, 5:405–424. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1225 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2015-08-28 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4832270/ /pubmed/27110292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1225 Text en © 2015 The Authors. WIREs Computational Molecular Science published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Advanced Reviews Ain, Qurrat Ul Aleksandrova, Antoniya Roessler, Florian D. Ballester, Pedro J. Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening |
title | Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening |
title_full | Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening |
title_fullStr | Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening |
title_short | Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening |
title_sort | machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening |
topic | Advanced Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ainqurratul machinelearningscoringfunctionstoimprovestructurebasedbindingaffinitypredictionandvirtualscreening AT aleksandrovaantoniya machinelearningscoringfunctionstoimprovestructurebasedbindingaffinitypredictionandvirtualscreening AT roesslerfloriand machinelearningscoringfunctionstoimprovestructurebasedbindingaffinitypredictionandvirtualscreening AT ballesterpedroj machinelearningscoringfunctionstoimprovestructurebasedbindingaffinitypredictionandvirtualscreening |