Cargando…

Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening

Docking tools to predict whether and how a small molecule binds to a target can be applied if a structural model of such target is available. The reliability of docking depends, however, on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function (SF). Despite intense research over the years, improving the accu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ain, Qurrat Ul, Aleksandrova, Antoniya, Roessler, Florian D., Ballester, Pedro J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1225
_version_ 1782427223152656384
author Ain, Qurrat Ul
Aleksandrova, Antoniya
Roessler, Florian D.
Ballester, Pedro J.
author_facet Ain, Qurrat Ul
Aleksandrova, Antoniya
Roessler, Florian D.
Ballester, Pedro J.
author_sort Ain, Qurrat Ul
collection PubMed
description Docking tools to predict whether and how a small molecule binds to a target can be applied if a structural model of such target is available. The reliability of docking depends, however, on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function (SF). Despite intense research over the years, improving the accuracy of SFs for structure‐based binding affinity prediction or virtual screening has proven to be a challenging task for any class of method. New SFs based on modern machine‐learning regression models, which do not impose a predetermined functional form and thus are able to exploit effectively much larger amounts of experimental data, have recently been introduced. These machine‐learning SFs have been shown to outperform a wide range of classical SFs at both binding affinity prediction and virtual screening. The emerging picture from these studies is that the classical approach of using linear regression with a small number of expert‐selected structural features can be strongly improved by a machine‐learning approach based on nonlinear regression allied with comprehensive data‐driven feature selection. Furthermore, the performance of classical SFs does not grow with larger training datasets and hence this performance gap is expected to widen as more training data becomes available in the future. Other topics covered in this review include predicting the reliability of a SF on a particular target class, generating synthetic data to improve predictive performance and modeling guidelines for SF development. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2015, 5:405–424. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1225 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4832270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48322702016-04-20 Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening Ain, Qurrat Ul Aleksandrova, Antoniya Roessler, Florian D. Ballester, Pedro J. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci Advanced Reviews Docking tools to predict whether and how a small molecule binds to a target can be applied if a structural model of such target is available. The reliability of docking depends, however, on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function (SF). Despite intense research over the years, improving the accuracy of SFs for structure‐based binding affinity prediction or virtual screening has proven to be a challenging task for any class of method. New SFs based on modern machine‐learning regression models, which do not impose a predetermined functional form and thus are able to exploit effectively much larger amounts of experimental data, have recently been introduced. These machine‐learning SFs have been shown to outperform a wide range of classical SFs at both binding affinity prediction and virtual screening. The emerging picture from these studies is that the classical approach of using linear regression with a small number of expert‐selected structural features can be strongly improved by a machine‐learning approach based on nonlinear regression allied with comprehensive data‐driven feature selection. Furthermore, the performance of classical SFs does not grow with larger training datasets and hence this performance gap is expected to widen as more training data becomes available in the future. Other topics covered in this review include predicting the reliability of a SF on a particular target class, generating synthetic data to improve predictive performance and modeling guidelines for SF development. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2015, 5:405–424. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1225 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2015-08-28 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4832270/ /pubmed/27110292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1225 Text en © 2015 The Authors. WIREs Computational Molecular Science published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Advanced Reviews
Ain, Qurrat Ul
Aleksandrova, Antoniya
Roessler, Florian D.
Ballester, Pedro J.
Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
title Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
title_full Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
title_fullStr Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
title_full_unstemmed Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
title_short Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
title_sort machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
topic Advanced Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1225
work_keys_str_mv AT ainqurratul machinelearningscoringfunctionstoimprovestructurebasedbindingaffinitypredictionandvirtualscreening
AT aleksandrovaantoniya machinelearningscoringfunctionstoimprovestructurebasedbindingaffinitypredictionandvirtualscreening
AT roesslerfloriand machinelearningscoringfunctionstoimprovestructurebasedbindingaffinitypredictionandvirtualscreening
AT ballesterpedroj machinelearningscoringfunctionstoimprovestructurebasedbindingaffinitypredictionandvirtualscreening