Cargando…

The presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant HIV‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated

Both the recognition of HIV‐infected cells and the immunogenicity of candidate CTL vaccines depend on the presentation of a peptide epitope at the cell surface, which in turn depends on intracellular antigen processing. Differential antigen processing maybe responsible for the differences in both th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jallow, Sabelle, Leligdowicz, Aleksandra, Kramer, Holger B., Onyango, Clayton, Cotten, Matthew, Wright, Cynthia, Whittle, Hilton C., McMichael, Andrew, Dong, Tao, Kessler, Benedikt M., Rowland‐Jones, Sarah L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26018465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545451
_version_ 1782427229890805760
author Jallow, Sabelle
Leligdowicz, Aleksandra
Kramer, Holger B.
Onyango, Clayton
Cotten, Matthew
Wright, Cynthia
Whittle, Hilton C.
McMichael, Andrew
Dong, Tao
Kessler, Benedikt M.
Rowland‐Jones, Sarah L.
author_facet Jallow, Sabelle
Leligdowicz, Aleksandra
Kramer, Holger B.
Onyango, Clayton
Cotten, Matthew
Wright, Cynthia
Whittle, Hilton C.
McMichael, Andrew
Dong, Tao
Kessler, Benedikt M.
Rowland‐Jones, Sarah L.
author_sort Jallow, Sabelle
collection PubMed
description Both the recognition of HIV‐infected cells and the immunogenicity of candidate CTL vaccines depend on the presentation of a peptide epitope at the cell surface, which in turn depends on intracellular antigen processing. Differential antigen processing maybe responsible for the differences in both the quality and the quantity of epitopes produced, influencing the immunodominance hierarchy of viral epitopes. Previously, we showed that the magnitude of the HIV‐2 gag‐specific T‐cell response is inversely correlated with plasma viral load, particularly when responses are directed against an epitope, (165)DRFYKSLRA(173), within the highly conserved Major Homology Region of gag‐p26. We also showed that the presence of three proline residues, at positions 119, 159 and 178 of gag‐p26, was significantly correlated with low viral load. Since this proline motif was also associated with stronger gag‐specific CTL responses, we investigated the impact of these prolines on proteasomal processing of the protective (165)DRFYKSLRA(173) epitope. Our data demonstrate that the (165)DRFYKSLRA(173) epitope is most efficiently processed from precursors that contain two flanking proline residues, found naturally in low viral‐load patients. Superior antigen processing and enhanced presentation may account for the link between infection with HIV‐2 encoding the “PPP‐gag” sequence and both strong gag‐specific CTL responses as well as lower viral load.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4832300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48323002016-04-20 The presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant HIV‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated Jallow, Sabelle Leligdowicz, Aleksandra Kramer, Holger B. Onyango, Clayton Cotten, Matthew Wright, Cynthia Whittle, Hilton C. McMichael, Andrew Dong, Tao Kessler, Benedikt M. Rowland‐Jones, Sarah L. Eur J Immunol Antigen Processing Both the recognition of HIV‐infected cells and the immunogenicity of candidate CTL vaccines depend on the presentation of a peptide epitope at the cell surface, which in turn depends on intracellular antigen processing. Differential antigen processing maybe responsible for the differences in both the quality and the quantity of epitopes produced, influencing the immunodominance hierarchy of viral epitopes. Previously, we showed that the magnitude of the HIV‐2 gag‐specific T‐cell response is inversely correlated with plasma viral load, particularly when responses are directed against an epitope, (165)DRFYKSLRA(173), within the highly conserved Major Homology Region of gag‐p26. We also showed that the presence of three proline residues, at positions 119, 159 and 178 of gag‐p26, was significantly correlated with low viral load. Since this proline motif was also associated with stronger gag‐specific CTL responses, we investigated the impact of these prolines on proteasomal processing of the protective (165)DRFYKSLRA(173) epitope. Our data demonstrate that the (165)DRFYKSLRA(173) epitope is most efficiently processed from precursors that contain two flanking proline residues, found naturally in low viral‐load patients. Superior antigen processing and enhanced presentation may account for the link between infection with HIV‐2 encoding the “PPP‐gag” sequence and both strong gag‐specific CTL responses as well as lower viral load. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-24 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4832300/ /pubmed/26018465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545451 Text en © 2015 The Authors. European Journal of Immunology published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.** This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Antigen Processing
Jallow, Sabelle
Leligdowicz, Aleksandra
Kramer, Holger B.
Onyango, Clayton
Cotten, Matthew
Wright, Cynthia
Whittle, Hilton C.
McMichael, Andrew
Dong, Tao
Kessler, Benedikt M.
Rowland‐Jones, Sarah L.
The presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant HIV‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated
title The presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant HIV‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated
title_full The presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant HIV‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated
title_fullStr The presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant HIV‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated
title_full_unstemmed The presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant HIV‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated
title_short The presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant HIV‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated
title_sort presence of prolines in the flanking region of an immunodominant hiv‐2 gag epitope influences the quality and quantity of the epitope generated
topic Antigen Processing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26018465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545451
work_keys_str_mv AT jallowsabelle thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT leligdowiczaleksandra thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT kramerholgerb thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT onyangoclayton thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT cottenmatthew thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT wrightcynthia thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT whittlehiltonc thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT mcmichaelandrew thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT dongtao thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT kesslerbenediktm thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT rowlandjonessarahl thepresenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT jallowsabelle presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT leligdowiczaleksandra presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT kramerholgerb presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT onyangoclayton presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT cottenmatthew presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT wrightcynthia presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT whittlehiltonc presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT mcmichaelandrew presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT dongtao presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT kesslerbenediktm presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated
AT rowlandjonessarahl presenceofprolinesintheflankingregionofanimmunodominanthiv2gagepitopeinfluencesthequalityandquantityoftheepitopegenerated