Cargando…

Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review

Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers’ health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosário, Susel, Fonseca, João A., Nienhaus, Albert, da Costa, José Torres
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9
_version_ 1782427259067432960
author Rosário, Susel
Fonseca, João A.
Nienhaus, Albert
da Costa, José Torres
author_facet Rosário, Susel
Fonseca, João A.
Nienhaus, Albert
da Costa, José Torres
author_sort Rosário, Susel
collection PubMed
description Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers’ health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria based on specific medical evaluation of work-related health outcomes and the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence assessing the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health based on studies that used standardized and validated instruments to assess the psychosocial work environment and that focused on medically confirmed health outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the databases PubMed, B-ON, Science Direct, Psycarticles, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection and the search engine (Google Scholar) using appropriate words for studies published from 2004 to 2014. This review follows the recommendations of the Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Studies were included in the review if data on psychosocial validated assessment method(s) for the study population and specific medical evaluation of health-related work outcome(s) were presented. In total, the search strategy yielded 10,623 references, of which 10 studies (seven prospective cohort and three cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (7/10) observed an adverse effect of poor psychosocial work factors on workers’ health: 3 on sickness absence, 4 on cardiovascular diseases. The other 3 studies reported detrimental effects on sleep and on disease-associated biomarkers. A more consistent effect was observed in studies of higher methodological quality that used a prospective design jointly with the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment and clinical evaluation. More prospective studies are needed to assess the evidence of work-related psychosocial factors on workers´ health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4832470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48324702016-04-16 Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review Rosário, Susel Fonseca, João A. Nienhaus, Albert da Costa, José Torres J Occup Med Toxicol Review Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers’ health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria based on specific medical evaluation of work-related health outcomes and the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence assessing the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health based on studies that used standardized and validated instruments to assess the psychosocial work environment and that focused on medically confirmed health outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the databases PubMed, B-ON, Science Direct, Psycarticles, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection and the search engine (Google Scholar) using appropriate words for studies published from 2004 to 2014. This review follows the recommendations of the Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Studies were included in the review if data on psychosocial validated assessment method(s) for the study population and specific medical evaluation of health-related work outcome(s) were presented. In total, the search strategy yielded 10,623 references, of which 10 studies (seven prospective cohort and three cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (7/10) observed an adverse effect of poor psychosocial work factors on workers’ health: 3 on sickness absence, 4 on cardiovascular diseases. The other 3 studies reported detrimental effects on sleep and on disease-associated biomarkers. A more consistent effect was observed in studies of higher methodological quality that used a prospective design jointly with the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment and clinical evaluation. More prospective studies are needed to assess the evidence of work-related psychosocial factors on workers´ health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4832470/ /pubmed/27087828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9 Text en © Rosário et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Rosário, Susel
Fonseca, João A.
Nienhaus, Albert
da Costa, José Torres
Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
title Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
title_full Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
title_fullStr Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
title_short Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
title_sort standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rosariosusel standardizedassessmentofpsychosocialfactorsandtheirinfluenceonmedicallyconfirmedhealthoutcomesinworkersasystematicreview
AT fonsecajoaoa standardizedassessmentofpsychosocialfactorsandtheirinfluenceonmedicallyconfirmedhealthoutcomesinworkersasystematicreview
AT nienhausalbert standardizedassessmentofpsychosocialfactorsandtheirinfluenceonmedicallyconfirmedhealthoutcomesinworkersasystematicreview
AT dacostajosetorres standardizedassessmentofpsychosocialfactorsandtheirinfluenceonmedicallyconfirmedhealthoutcomesinworkersasystematicreview