Cargando…
Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers’ health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria bas...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9 |
_version_ | 1782427259067432960 |
---|---|
author | Rosário, Susel Fonseca, João A. Nienhaus, Albert da Costa, José Torres |
author_facet | Rosário, Susel Fonseca, João A. Nienhaus, Albert da Costa, José Torres |
author_sort | Rosário, Susel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers’ health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria based on specific medical evaluation of work-related health outcomes and the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence assessing the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health based on studies that used standardized and validated instruments to assess the psychosocial work environment and that focused on medically confirmed health outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the databases PubMed, B-ON, Science Direct, Psycarticles, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection and the search engine (Google Scholar) using appropriate words for studies published from 2004 to 2014. This review follows the recommendations of the Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Studies were included in the review if data on psychosocial validated assessment method(s) for the study population and specific medical evaluation of health-related work outcome(s) were presented. In total, the search strategy yielded 10,623 references, of which 10 studies (seven prospective cohort and three cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (7/10) observed an adverse effect of poor psychosocial work factors on workers’ health: 3 on sickness absence, 4 on cardiovascular diseases. The other 3 studies reported detrimental effects on sleep and on disease-associated biomarkers. A more consistent effect was observed in studies of higher methodological quality that used a prospective design jointly with the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment and clinical evaluation. More prospective studies are needed to assess the evidence of work-related psychosocial factors on workers´ health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4832470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48324702016-04-16 Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review Rosário, Susel Fonseca, João A. Nienhaus, Albert da Costa, José Torres J Occup Med Toxicol Review Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers’ health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria based on specific medical evaluation of work-related health outcomes and the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence assessing the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health based on studies that used standardized and validated instruments to assess the psychosocial work environment and that focused on medically confirmed health outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the databases PubMed, B-ON, Science Direct, Psycarticles, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection and the search engine (Google Scholar) using appropriate words for studies published from 2004 to 2014. This review follows the recommendations of the Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Studies were included in the review if data on psychosocial validated assessment method(s) for the study population and specific medical evaluation of health-related work outcome(s) were presented. In total, the search strategy yielded 10,623 references, of which 10 studies (seven prospective cohort and three cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (7/10) observed an adverse effect of poor psychosocial work factors on workers’ health: 3 on sickness absence, 4 on cardiovascular diseases. The other 3 studies reported detrimental effects on sleep and on disease-associated biomarkers. A more consistent effect was observed in studies of higher methodological quality that used a prospective design jointly with the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment and clinical evaluation. More prospective studies are needed to assess the evidence of work-related psychosocial factors on workers´ health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4832470/ /pubmed/27087828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9 Text en © Rosário et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Rosário, Susel Fonseca, João A. Nienhaus, Albert da Costa, José Torres Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review |
title | Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review |
title_full | Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review |
title_short | Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review |
title_sort | standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosariosusel standardizedassessmentofpsychosocialfactorsandtheirinfluenceonmedicallyconfirmedhealthoutcomesinworkersasystematicreview AT fonsecajoaoa standardizedassessmentofpsychosocialfactorsandtheirinfluenceonmedicallyconfirmedhealthoutcomesinworkersasystematicreview AT nienhausalbert standardizedassessmentofpsychosocialfactorsandtheirinfluenceonmedicallyconfirmedhealthoutcomesinworkersasystematicreview AT dacostajosetorres standardizedassessmentofpsychosocialfactorsandtheirinfluenceonmedicallyconfirmedhealthoutcomesinworkersasystematicreview |