Cargando…

The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice in eating disorders incorporates three essential components: research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values, preferences, and characteristics. Conceptualized as a ‘three-legged stool’ by Sackett et al. in 1996 (BMJ), all of these components of evidence-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peterson, Carol B., Becker, Carolyn Black, Treasure, Janet, Shafran, Roz, Bryant-Waugh, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27081002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0615-5
_version_ 1782427270384713728
author Peterson, Carol B.
Becker, Carolyn Black
Treasure, Janet
Shafran, Roz
Bryant-Waugh, Rachel
author_facet Peterson, Carol B.
Becker, Carolyn Black
Treasure, Janet
Shafran, Roz
Bryant-Waugh, Rachel
author_sort Peterson, Carol B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice in eating disorders incorporates three essential components: research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values, preferences, and characteristics. Conceptualized as a ‘three-legged stool’ by Sackett et al. in 1996 (BMJ), all of these components of evidence-based practice are considered essential for providing optimal care in the treatment of eating disorders. However, the extent to which these individual aspects of evidence-based practice are valued among clinicians and researchers is variable, with each of these stool ‘legs’ being neglected at times. As a result, empirical support and patient preferences for treatment are not consistently considered in the selection and implementation of eating disorder treatment. In addition, clinicians may not have access to training to provide treatments supported by research and preferred by patients. Despite these challenges, integrating these three components of evidence-based practice is critical for the effective treatment of eating disorders. DISCUSSION: Current research supports the use of several types of psychotherapies, including cognitive-behavioral, interpersonal, and family-based therapies, as well as certain types of medications for the treatment of eating disorders. However, limitations in current research, including sample heterogeneity, inconsistent efficacy, a paucity of data, the need for tailored approaches, and the use of staging models highlight the need for clinical expertise. Although preliminary data also support the importance of patient preferences, values, and perspectives for optimizing treatment, enhancing treatment outcome, and minimizing attrition among patients with eating disorders, the extent to which patient preference is consistently predictive of outcome is less clear and requires further investigation. SUMMARY: All three components of evidence-based practice are integral for the optimal treatment of eating disorders. Integrating clinical expertise and patient perspective may also facilitate the dissemination of empirically-supported and emerging treatments as well as prevention programs. Further research is imperative to identify ways in which this three-legged approach to eating disorder treatment could be most effectively implemented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4832531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48325312016-04-16 The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives Peterson, Carol B. Becker, Carolyn Black Treasure, Janet Shafran, Roz Bryant-Waugh, Rachel BMC Med Opinion BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice in eating disorders incorporates three essential components: research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values, preferences, and characteristics. Conceptualized as a ‘three-legged stool’ by Sackett et al. in 1996 (BMJ), all of these components of evidence-based practice are considered essential for providing optimal care in the treatment of eating disorders. However, the extent to which these individual aspects of evidence-based practice are valued among clinicians and researchers is variable, with each of these stool ‘legs’ being neglected at times. As a result, empirical support and patient preferences for treatment are not consistently considered in the selection and implementation of eating disorder treatment. In addition, clinicians may not have access to training to provide treatments supported by research and preferred by patients. Despite these challenges, integrating these three components of evidence-based practice is critical for the effective treatment of eating disorders. DISCUSSION: Current research supports the use of several types of psychotherapies, including cognitive-behavioral, interpersonal, and family-based therapies, as well as certain types of medications for the treatment of eating disorders. However, limitations in current research, including sample heterogeneity, inconsistent efficacy, a paucity of data, the need for tailored approaches, and the use of staging models highlight the need for clinical expertise. Although preliminary data also support the importance of patient preferences, values, and perspectives for optimizing treatment, enhancing treatment outcome, and minimizing attrition among patients with eating disorders, the extent to which patient preference is consistently predictive of outcome is less clear and requires further investigation. SUMMARY: All three components of evidence-based practice are integral for the optimal treatment of eating disorders. Integrating clinical expertise and patient perspective may also facilitate the dissemination of empirically-supported and emerging treatments as well as prevention programs. Further research is imperative to identify ways in which this three-legged approach to eating disorder treatment could be most effectively implemented. BioMed Central 2016-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4832531/ /pubmed/27081002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0615-5 Text en © Peterson et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Opinion
Peterson, Carol B.
Becker, Carolyn Black
Treasure, Janet
Shafran, Roz
Bryant-Waugh, Rachel
The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives
title The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives
title_full The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives
title_fullStr The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives
title_full_unstemmed The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives
title_short The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives
title_sort three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27081002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0615-5
work_keys_str_mv AT petersoncarolb thethreeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT beckercarolynblack thethreeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT treasurejanet thethreeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT shafranroz thethreeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT bryantwaughrachel thethreeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT petersoncarolb threeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT beckercarolynblack threeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT treasurejanet threeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT shafranroz threeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives
AT bryantwaughrachel threeleggedstoolofevidencebasedpracticeineatingdisordertreatmentresearchclinicalandpatientperspectives