Cargando…
Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review
PURPOSE: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by implant-supported prosthesis is a successful and satisfying treatment as suggested by many clinical trials. However, the minimum number of implants required for this restoration is debatable. Single implant retained overdenture (SIROD) has gained...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134432 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.164881 |
_version_ | 1782427285092040704 |
---|---|
author | Mahoorkar, Sudhindra Bhat, Srinidhi Kant, Radhika |
author_facet | Mahoorkar, Sudhindra Bhat, Srinidhi Kant, Radhika |
author_sort | Mahoorkar, Sudhindra |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by implant-supported prosthesis is a successful and satisfying treatment as suggested by many clinical trials. However, the minimum number of implants required for this restoration is debatable. Single implant retained overdenture (SIROD) has gained popularity as a simple protocol. The purpose of this review is to systematically analyze the literature on SIROD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was done in the PubMed and Medline databases using the key words “central single implant overdenture,” “implant overdenture retained by one implant,” “implant overdenture retained by single implant,” “mandibular single implant overdenture,” “mandibular SIRODs.” Articles from 1993 to November 2012 were included in the review. Out of 208 articles, only 18 had relevant data pertaining to mandibular single implant overdenture. Two more were hand-picked from journals that are non-PubMed indexed but from reputed publishing houses. RESULTS: Majority of studies supported the concept of SIROD. Success outcome was addressed in relation to surgical, prosthetic, functional parameters, and patient satisfaction. 65% studies evaluated the primary stabilities of the placed implants, 50% of studies assessed the marginal bone loss quarterly across a 1-year period. Prosthesis outcome was a criterion for evaluation of success rate in 45% of studies. CONCLUSION: The SIROD is proved to be successful and an economic treatment protocol. However, the clinical parameters such as masticatory efficiency bite force, retention, and stability needs to be investigated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4832806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48328062017-01-01 Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review Mahoorkar, Sudhindra Bhat, Srinidhi Kant, Radhika J Indian Prosthodont Soc Evidence Summary PURPOSE: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by implant-supported prosthesis is a successful and satisfying treatment as suggested by many clinical trials. However, the minimum number of implants required for this restoration is debatable. Single implant retained overdenture (SIROD) has gained popularity as a simple protocol. The purpose of this review is to systematically analyze the literature on SIROD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was done in the PubMed and Medline databases using the key words “central single implant overdenture,” “implant overdenture retained by one implant,” “implant overdenture retained by single implant,” “mandibular single implant overdenture,” “mandibular SIRODs.” Articles from 1993 to November 2012 were included in the review. Out of 208 articles, only 18 had relevant data pertaining to mandibular single implant overdenture. Two more were hand-picked from journals that are non-PubMed indexed but from reputed publishing houses. RESULTS: Majority of studies supported the concept of SIROD. Success outcome was addressed in relation to surgical, prosthetic, functional parameters, and patient satisfaction. 65% studies evaluated the primary stabilities of the placed implants, 50% of studies assessed the marginal bone loss quarterly across a 1-year period. Prosthesis outcome was a criterion for evaluation of success rate in 45% of studies. CONCLUSION: The SIROD is proved to be successful and an economic treatment protocol. However, the clinical parameters such as masticatory efficiency bite force, retention, and stability needs to be investigated. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4832806/ /pubmed/27134432 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.164881 Text en Copyright: © The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Summary Mahoorkar, Sudhindra Bhat, Srinidhi Kant, Radhika Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review |
title | Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review |
title_full | Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review |
title_fullStr | Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review |
title_short | Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review |
title_sort | single implant supported mandibular overdenture: a literature review |
topic | Evidence Summary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134432 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.164881 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahoorkarsudhindra singleimplantsupportedmandibularoverdenturealiteraturereview AT bhatsrinidhi singleimplantsupportedmandibularoverdenturealiteraturereview AT kantradhika singleimplantsupportedmandibularoverdenturealiteraturereview |