Cargando…

Role of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Malignant Tumors

OBJECTIVE: To elaborate the role of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant tumors. DATA SOURCES: Data cited in this review were obtained mainly from PubMed in English from 1999 to 2014, with keywords “dynamic contrast-enhanced (D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Qing-Gang, Xian, Jun-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25881611
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.155127
_version_ 1782427311126085632
author Xu, Qing-Gang
Xian, Jun-Fang
author_facet Xu, Qing-Gang
Xian, Jun-Fang
author_sort Xu, Qing-Gang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To elaborate the role of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant tumors. DATA SOURCES: Data cited in this review were obtained mainly from PubMed in English from 1999 to 2014, with keywords “dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI,” “diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI),” “microcirculation,” “apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC),” “treatment response” and “oncology.” STUDY SELECTION: Articles regarding principles of DCE-MRI, principles of DWI, clinical applications as well as opportunity and aspiration were identified, retrieved and reviewed. RESULTS: A significant correlation between ADC values and treatment response was reported in most DWI studies. Most quantitative DCE-MRI studies showed a significant correlation between K(trans) values and treatment response. However, in different tumors and studies, both high and low pretreatment ADC or K(trans) values were found to be associated with response rate. Both DCE-MRI and DWI demonstrated changes in their parameters hours to days after treatment, showing a decrease in K(trans) or an increase in ADC associated with response in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of quantitative MRI play an important role in the evaluation of treatment response of malignant tumors and hold promise for use as a cancer treatment response biomarker. However, validation is hampered by the lack of reproducibility and standardization. MRI acquisition protocols and quantitative image analysis approaches should be properly addressed prior to further testing the clinical use of quantitative MRI parameters in the assessment of treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4832957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48329572016-04-29 Role of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Malignant Tumors Xu, Qing-Gang Xian, Jun-Fang Chin Med J (Engl) Review Article OBJECTIVE: To elaborate the role of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant tumors. DATA SOURCES: Data cited in this review were obtained mainly from PubMed in English from 1999 to 2014, with keywords “dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI,” “diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI),” “microcirculation,” “apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC),” “treatment response” and “oncology.” STUDY SELECTION: Articles regarding principles of DCE-MRI, principles of DWI, clinical applications as well as opportunity and aspiration were identified, retrieved and reviewed. RESULTS: A significant correlation between ADC values and treatment response was reported in most DWI studies. Most quantitative DCE-MRI studies showed a significant correlation between K(trans) values and treatment response. However, in different tumors and studies, both high and low pretreatment ADC or K(trans) values were found to be associated with response rate. Both DCE-MRI and DWI demonstrated changes in their parameters hours to days after treatment, showing a decrease in K(trans) or an increase in ADC associated with response in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of quantitative MRI play an important role in the evaluation of treatment response of malignant tumors and hold promise for use as a cancer treatment response biomarker. However, validation is hampered by the lack of reproducibility and standardization. MRI acquisition protocols and quantitative image analysis approaches should be properly addressed prior to further testing the clinical use of quantitative MRI parameters in the assessment of treatments. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4832957/ /pubmed/25881611 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.155127 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Xu, Qing-Gang
Xian, Jun-Fang
Role of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Malignant Tumors
title Role of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Malignant Tumors
title_full Role of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Malignant Tumors
title_fullStr Role of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Malignant Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Role of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Malignant Tumors
title_short Role of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Malignant Tumors
title_sort role of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant tumors
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25881611
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.155127
work_keys_str_mv AT xuqinggang roleofquantitativemagneticresonanceimagingparametersintheevaluationoftreatmentresponseinmalignanttumors
AT xianjunfang roleofquantitativemagneticresonanceimagingparametersintheevaluationoftreatmentresponseinmalignanttumors