Cargando…
International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have been numerous calls for global institutions to develop and enforce new international laws. International laws are, however, often blunt instruments with many uncertain benefits, costs, risks of harm, and trade-offs. Thus, they are probably not always appropria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27084338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0 |
_version_ | 1782427406354612224 |
---|---|
author | Hoffman, Steven J. Hughsam, Matthew Randhawa, Harkanwal Sritharan, Lathika Guyatt, Gordon Lavis, John N. Røttingen, John-Arne |
author_facet | Hoffman, Steven J. Hughsam, Matthew Randhawa, Harkanwal Sritharan, Lathika Guyatt, Gordon Lavis, John N. Røttingen, John-Arne |
author_sort | Hoffman, Steven J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have been numerous calls for global institutions to develop and enforce new international laws. International laws are, however, often blunt instruments with many uncertain benefits, costs, risks of harm, and trade-offs. Thus, they are probably not always appropriate solutions to global health challenges. Given these uncertainties and international law’s potential importance for improving global health, the paucity of synthesized evidence addressing whether international laws achieve their intended effects or whether they are superior in comparison to other approaches is problematic. METHODS: Ten electronic bibliographic databases were searched using predefined search strategies, including MEDLINE, Global Health, CINAHL, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Dissertations and Theses, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, International Political Science Abstracts, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, PAIS International, and Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts using predefined inclusion criteria. Pairs of reviewers will then independently screen the full-text of articles for inclusion using predefined inclusion criteria and then independently extract data and assess risk of bias for included studies. Where feasible, results will be pooled through subgroup analyses, meta-analyses, and meta-regression techniques. DISCUSSION: The findings of this review will contribute to a better understanding of the expected benefits and possible harms of using international law to address different kinds of problems, thereby providing important evidence-informed guidance on when and how it can be effectively introduced and implemented by countries and global institutions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015019830 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4833910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48339102016-04-17 International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis Hoffman, Steven J. Hughsam, Matthew Randhawa, Harkanwal Sritharan, Lathika Guyatt, Gordon Lavis, John N. Røttingen, John-Arne Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have been numerous calls for global institutions to develop and enforce new international laws. International laws are, however, often blunt instruments with many uncertain benefits, costs, risks of harm, and trade-offs. Thus, they are probably not always appropriate solutions to global health challenges. Given these uncertainties and international law’s potential importance for improving global health, the paucity of synthesized evidence addressing whether international laws achieve their intended effects or whether they are superior in comparison to other approaches is problematic. METHODS: Ten electronic bibliographic databases were searched using predefined search strategies, including MEDLINE, Global Health, CINAHL, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Dissertations and Theses, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, International Political Science Abstracts, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, PAIS International, and Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts using predefined inclusion criteria. Pairs of reviewers will then independently screen the full-text of articles for inclusion using predefined inclusion criteria and then independently extract data and assess risk of bias for included studies. Where feasible, results will be pooled through subgroup analyses, meta-analyses, and meta-regression techniques. DISCUSSION: The findings of this review will contribute to a better understanding of the expected benefits and possible harms of using international law to address different kinds of problems, thereby providing important evidence-informed guidance on when and how it can be effectively introduced and implemented by countries and global institutions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015019830 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4833910/ /pubmed/27084338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0 Text en © Hoffman et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Hoffman, Steven J. Hughsam, Matthew Randhawa, Harkanwal Sritharan, Lathika Guyatt, Gordon Lavis, John N. Røttingen, John-Arne International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis |
title | International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis |
title_full | International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis |
title_fullStr | International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis |
title_short | International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis |
title_sort | international law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27084338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmanstevenj internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis AT hughsammatthew internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis AT randhawaharkanwal internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis AT sritharanlathika internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis AT guyattgordon internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis AT lavisjohnn internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis AT røttingenjohnarne internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis |