Cargando…

International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have been numerous calls for global institutions to develop and enforce new international laws. International laws are, however, often blunt instruments with many uncertain benefits, costs, risks of harm, and trade-offs. Thus, they are probably not always appropria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffman, Steven J., Hughsam, Matthew, Randhawa, Harkanwal, Sritharan, Lathika, Guyatt, Gordon, Lavis, John N., Røttingen, John-Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27084338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0
_version_ 1782427406354612224
author Hoffman, Steven J.
Hughsam, Matthew
Randhawa, Harkanwal
Sritharan, Lathika
Guyatt, Gordon
Lavis, John N.
Røttingen, John-Arne
author_facet Hoffman, Steven J.
Hughsam, Matthew
Randhawa, Harkanwal
Sritharan, Lathika
Guyatt, Gordon
Lavis, John N.
Røttingen, John-Arne
author_sort Hoffman, Steven J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have been numerous calls for global institutions to develop and enforce new international laws. International laws are, however, often blunt instruments with many uncertain benefits, costs, risks of harm, and trade-offs. Thus, they are probably not always appropriate solutions to global health challenges. Given these uncertainties and international law’s potential importance for improving global health, the paucity of synthesized evidence addressing whether international laws achieve their intended effects or whether they are superior in comparison to other approaches is problematic. METHODS: Ten electronic bibliographic databases were searched using predefined search strategies, including MEDLINE, Global Health, CINAHL, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Dissertations and Theses, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, International Political Science Abstracts, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, PAIS International, and Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts using predefined inclusion criteria. Pairs of reviewers will then independently screen the full-text of articles for inclusion using predefined inclusion criteria and then independently extract data and assess risk of bias for included studies. Where feasible, results will be pooled through subgroup analyses, meta-analyses, and meta-regression techniques. DISCUSSION: The findings of this review will contribute to a better understanding of the expected benefits and possible harms of using international law to address different kinds of problems, thereby providing important evidence-informed guidance on when and how it can be effectively introduced and implemented by countries and global institutions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015019830 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4833910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48339102016-04-17 International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis Hoffman, Steven J. Hughsam, Matthew Randhawa, Harkanwal Sritharan, Lathika Guyatt, Gordon Lavis, John N. Røttingen, John-Arne Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have been numerous calls for global institutions to develop and enforce new international laws. International laws are, however, often blunt instruments with many uncertain benefits, costs, risks of harm, and trade-offs. Thus, they are probably not always appropriate solutions to global health challenges. Given these uncertainties and international law’s potential importance for improving global health, the paucity of synthesized evidence addressing whether international laws achieve their intended effects or whether they are superior in comparison to other approaches is problematic. METHODS: Ten electronic bibliographic databases were searched using predefined search strategies, including MEDLINE, Global Health, CINAHL, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Dissertations and Theses, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, International Political Science Abstracts, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, PAIS International, and Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts using predefined inclusion criteria. Pairs of reviewers will then independently screen the full-text of articles for inclusion using predefined inclusion criteria and then independently extract data and assess risk of bias for included studies. Where feasible, results will be pooled through subgroup analyses, meta-analyses, and meta-regression techniques. DISCUSSION: The findings of this review will contribute to a better understanding of the expected benefits and possible harms of using international law to address different kinds of problems, thereby providing important evidence-informed guidance on when and how it can be effectively introduced and implemented by countries and global institutions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015019830 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4833910/ /pubmed/27084338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0 Text en © Hoffman et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Hoffman, Steven J.
Hughsam, Matthew
Randhawa, Harkanwal
Sritharan, Lathika
Guyatt, Gordon
Lavis, John N.
Røttingen, John-Arne
International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
title International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
title_full International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
title_fullStr International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
title_full_unstemmed International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
title_short International law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
title_sort international law’s effects on health and its social determinants: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27084338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0238-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmanstevenj internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT hughsammatthew internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT randhawaharkanwal internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT sritharanlathika internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT guyattgordon internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT lavisjohnn internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT røttingenjohnarne internationallawseffectsonhealthanditssocialdeterminantsprotocolforasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis