Cargando…

Comparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss

BACKGROUND: Complex noise and its relation to hearing loss are difficult to measure and evaluate. In complex noise measurement, individual exposure results may not accurately represent lifetime noise exposure. Thus, the mean L(Aeq,8 h) values of individuals in the same workgroup were also used to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hua, Li, Nan, Yang, Qiu-Ling, Qiu, Wei, Zhu, Liang-Liang, Tao, Li-Yuan, Davis, Robert I, Heyer, Nicholas, Zhao, Yi-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25758279
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.152659
_version_ 1782427425521532928
author Zhang, Hua
Li, Nan
Yang, Qiu-Ling
Qiu, Wei
Zhu, Liang-Liang
Tao, Li-Yuan
Davis, Robert I
Heyer, Nicholas
Zhao, Yi-Ming
author_facet Zhang, Hua
Li, Nan
Yang, Qiu-Ling
Qiu, Wei
Zhu, Liang-Liang
Tao, Li-Yuan
Davis, Robert I
Heyer, Nicholas
Zhao, Yi-Ming
author_sort Zhang, Hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complex noise and its relation to hearing loss are difficult to measure and evaluate. In complex noise measurement, individual exposure results may not accurately represent lifetime noise exposure. Thus, the mean L(Aeq,8 h) values of individuals in the same workgroup were also used to represent L(Aeq,8 h) in our study. Our study aimed to explore whether the mean exposure levels of workers in the same workgroup represented real noise exposure better than individual exposure levels did. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to establish a model for cumulative noise exposure (CNE) and hearing loss in 205 occupational noise-exposed workers who were recruited from two large automobile manufacturers in China. We used a personal noise dosimeter and a questionnaire to determine the workers’ occupational noise exposure levels and exposure times, respectively. A qualified audiologist used standardized audiometric procedures to assess hearing acuity after at least 16 h of noise avoidance. RESULTS: We observed that 88.3% of workers were exposed to more than 85 dB(A) of occupational noise (mean: 89.3 ± 4.2 dB(A)). The personal CNE (CNEp) and workgroup CNE (CNEg) were 100.5 ± 4.7 dB(A) and 100.5 ± 2.9 dB(A), respectively. In the binary logistic regression analysis, we established a regression model with high-frequency hearing loss as the dependent variable and CNE as the independent variable. The Wald value was 5.014 with CNEp as the independent variable and 8.653 with CNEg as the independent variable. Furthermore, we found that the figure for CNEg was more similar to the stationary noise reference than CNEp was. The CNEg model was better than the CNEp model. In this circumstance, we can measure some subjects instead of the whole workgroup and save manpower. CONCLUSIONS: In a complex noise environment, the measurements of average noise exposure level of the workgroup can improve the accuracy and save manpower.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4833989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48339892016-04-29 Comparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss Zhang, Hua Li, Nan Yang, Qiu-Ling Qiu, Wei Zhu, Liang-Liang Tao, Li-Yuan Davis, Robert I Heyer, Nicholas Zhao, Yi-Ming Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Complex noise and its relation to hearing loss are difficult to measure and evaluate. In complex noise measurement, individual exposure results may not accurately represent lifetime noise exposure. Thus, the mean L(Aeq,8 h) values of individuals in the same workgroup were also used to represent L(Aeq,8 h) in our study. Our study aimed to explore whether the mean exposure levels of workers in the same workgroup represented real noise exposure better than individual exposure levels did. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to establish a model for cumulative noise exposure (CNE) and hearing loss in 205 occupational noise-exposed workers who were recruited from two large automobile manufacturers in China. We used a personal noise dosimeter and a questionnaire to determine the workers’ occupational noise exposure levels and exposure times, respectively. A qualified audiologist used standardized audiometric procedures to assess hearing acuity after at least 16 h of noise avoidance. RESULTS: We observed that 88.3% of workers were exposed to more than 85 dB(A) of occupational noise (mean: 89.3 ± 4.2 dB(A)). The personal CNE (CNEp) and workgroup CNE (CNEg) were 100.5 ± 4.7 dB(A) and 100.5 ± 2.9 dB(A), respectively. In the binary logistic regression analysis, we established a regression model with high-frequency hearing loss as the dependent variable and CNE as the independent variable. The Wald value was 5.014 with CNEp as the independent variable and 8.653 with CNEg as the independent variable. Furthermore, we found that the figure for CNEg was more similar to the stationary noise reference than CNEp was. The CNEg model was better than the CNEp model. In this circumstance, we can measure some subjects instead of the whole workgroup and save manpower. CONCLUSIONS: In a complex noise environment, the measurements of average noise exposure level of the workgroup can improve the accuracy and save manpower. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4833989/ /pubmed/25758279 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.152659 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Hua
Li, Nan
Yang, Qiu-Ling
Qiu, Wei
Zhu, Liang-Liang
Tao, Li-Yuan
Davis, Robert I
Heyer, Nicholas
Zhao, Yi-Ming
Comparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss
title Comparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss
title_full Comparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss
title_short Comparison of Two Dose-response Relationship of Noise Exposure Evaluation Results with High Frequency Hearing Loss
title_sort comparison of two dose-response relationship of noise exposure evaluation results with high frequency hearing loss
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25758279
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.152659
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghua comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss
AT linan comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss
AT yangqiuling comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss
AT qiuwei comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss
AT zhuliangliang comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss
AT taoliyuan comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss
AT davisroberti comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss
AT heyernicholas comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss
AT zhaoyiming comparisonoftwodoseresponserelationshipofnoiseexposureevaluationresultswithhighfrequencyhearingloss