Cargando…
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in middle-aged adults (45–64 years) in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles, and to investigate factors associated with PIP, using the PROMPT (PRescribing Optimally in M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26820292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z |
_version_ | 1782427440478420992 |
---|---|
author | Cooper, Janine A. Moriarty, Frank Ryan, Cristín Smith, Susan M. Bennett, Kathleen Fahey, Tom Wallace, Emma Cahir, Caitriona Williams, David Teeling, Mary Hughes, Carmel M. |
author_facet | Cooper, Janine A. Moriarty, Frank Ryan, Cristín Smith, Susan M. Bennett, Kathleen Fahey, Tom Wallace, Emma Cahir, Caitriona Williams, David Teeling, Mary Hughes, Carmel M. |
author_sort | Cooper, Janine A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in middle-aged adults (45–64 years) in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles, and to investigate factors associated with PIP, using the PROMPT (PRescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People’s Treatments) criteria. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 2012 data from the Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD), covering the full population in Northern Ireland and the Health Services Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE-PCRS) database, covering the most socio-economically deprived third of the population in this age group in the Republic of Ireland. The prevalence for each PROMPT criterion and overall prevalence of PIP were calculated. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between PIP and gender, age group and polypharmacy. RESULTS: This study included 441,925 patients from the EPD and 309,748 patients from the HSE-PCRS database. Polypharmacy was common in both datasets (46.7 % in the HSE-PCRS and 20.3 % in the EPD). The prevalence of PIP was 42.9 % (95%CI 42.7, 43.1) in the HSE-PCRS and 21.1 % (95%CI 21.0, 21.2) in the EPD. Age group, female gender and polypharmacy were significantly associated with PIP in both populations (p < 0.05) and polypharmacy had the strongest association. CONCLUSIONS: PIP is common amongst middle-aged people with the risk of PIP increasing with polypharmacy. Differences in the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIP between the two populations may relate to heterogeneity in healthcare services and different socio-economic profiles, with higher rates of multimorbidity and associated polypharmacy in more deprived groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4834102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48341022016-04-26 Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria Cooper, Janine A. Moriarty, Frank Ryan, Cristín Smith, Susan M. Bennett, Kathleen Fahey, Tom Wallace, Emma Cahir, Caitriona Williams, David Teeling, Mary Hughes, Carmel M. Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in middle-aged adults (45–64 years) in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles, and to investigate factors associated with PIP, using the PROMPT (PRescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People’s Treatments) criteria. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 2012 data from the Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD), covering the full population in Northern Ireland and the Health Services Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE-PCRS) database, covering the most socio-economically deprived third of the population in this age group in the Republic of Ireland. The prevalence for each PROMPT criterion and overall prevalence of PIP were calculated. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between PIP and gender, age group and polypharmacy. RESULTS: This study included 441,925 patients from the EPD and 309,748 patients from the HSE-PCRS database. Polypharmacy was common in both datasets (46.7 % in the HSE-PCRS and 20.3 % in the EPD). The prevalence of PIP was 42.9 % (95%CI 42.7, 43.1) in the HSE-PCRS and 21.1 % (95%CI 21.0, 21.2) in the EPD. Age group, female gender and polypharmacy were significantly associated with PIP in both populations (p < 0.05) and polypharmacy had the strongest association. CONCLUSIONS: PIP is common amongst middle-aged people with the risk of PIP increasing with polypharmacy. Differences in the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIP between the two populations may relate to heterogeneity in healthcare services and different socio-economic profiles, with higher rates of multimorbidity and associated polypharmacy in more deprived groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-01-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4834102/ /pubmed/26820292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription Cooper, Janine A. Moriarty, Frank Ryan, Cristín Smith, Susan M. Bennett, Kathleen Fahey, Tom Wallace, Emma Cahir, Caitriona Williams, David Teeling, Mary Hughes, Carmel M. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria |
title | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria |
title_full | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria |
title_fullStr | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria |
title_short | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria |
title_sort | potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the prompt criteria |
topic | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26820292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cooperjaninea potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT moriartyfrank potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT ryancristin potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT smithsusanm potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT bennettkathleen potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT faheytom potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT wallaceemma potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT cahircaitriona potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT williamsdavid potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT teelingmary potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria AT hughescarmelm potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria |