Cargando…

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in middle-aged adults (45–64 years) in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles, and to investigate factors associated with PIP, using the PROMPT (PRescribing Optimally in M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Janine A., Moriarty, Frank, Ryan, Cristín, Smith, Susan M., Bennett, Kathleen, Fahey, Tom, Wallace, Emma, Cahir, Caitriona, Williams, David, Teeling, Mary, Hughes, Carmel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26820292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z
_version_ 1782427440478420992
author Cooper, Janine A.
Moriarty, Frank
Ryan, Cristín
Smith, Susan M.
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Wallace, Emma
Cahir, Caitriona
Williams, David
Teeling, Mary
Hughes, Carmel M.
author_facet Cooper, Janine A.
Moriarty, Frank
Ryan, Cristín
Smith, Susan M.
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Wallace, Emma
Cahir, Caitriona
Williams, David
Teeling, Mary
Hughes, Carmel M.
author_sort Cooper, Janine A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in middle-aged adults (45–64 years) in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles, and to investigate factors associated with PIP, using the PROMPT (PRescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People’s Treatments) criteria. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 2012 data from the Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD), covering the full population in Northern Ireland and the Health Services Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE-PCRS) database, covering the most socio-economically deprived third of the population in this age group in the Republic of Ireland. The prevalence for each PROMPT criterion and overall prevalence of PIP were calculated. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between PIP and gender, age group and polypharmacy. RESULTS: This study included 441,925 patients from the EPD and 309,748 patients from the HSE-PCRS database. Polypharmacy was common in both datasets (46.7 % in the HSE-PCRS and 20.3 % in the EPD). The prevalence of PIP was 42.9 % (95%CI 42.7, 43.1) in the HSE-PCRS and 21.1 % (95%CI 21.0, 21.2) in the EPD. Age group, female gender and polypharmacy were significantly associated with PIP in both populations (p < 0.05) and polypharmacy had the strongest association. CONCLUSIONS: PIP is common amongst middle-aged people with the risk of PIP increasing with polypharmacy. Differences in the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIP between the two populations may relate to heterogeneity in healthcare services and different socio-economic profiles, with higher rates of multimorbidity and associated polypharmacy in more deprived groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48341022016-04-26 Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria Cooper, Janine A. Moriarty, Frank Ryan, Cristín Smith, Susan M. Bennett, Kathleen Fahey, Tom Wallace, Emma Cahir, Caitriona Williams, David Teeling, Mary Hughes, Carmel M. Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in middle-aged adults (45–64 years) in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles, and to investigate factors associated with PIP, using the PROMPT (PRescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People’s Treatments) criteria. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 2012 data from the Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD), covering the full population in Northern Ireland and the Health Services Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE-PCRS) database, covering the most socio-economically deprived third of the population in this age group in the Republic of Ireland. The prevalence for each PROMPT criterion and overall prevalence of PIP were calculated. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between PIP and gender, age group and polypharmacy. RESULTS: This study included 441,925 patients from the EPD and 309,748 patients from the HSE-PCRS database. Polypharmacy was common in both datasets (46.7 % in the HSE-PCRS and 20.3 % in the EPD). The prevalence of PIP was 42.9 % (95%CI 42.7, 43.1) in the HSE-PCRS and 21.1 % (95%CI 21.0, 21.2) in the EPD. Age group, female gender and polypharmacy were significantly associated with PIP in both populations (p < 0.05) and polypharmacy had the strongest association. CONCLUSIONS: PIP is common amongst middle-aged people with the risk of PIP increasing with polypharmacy. Differences in the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIP between the two populations may relate to heterogeneity in healthcare services and different socio-economic profiles, with higher rates of multimorbidity and associated polypharmacy in more deprived groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-01-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4834102/ /pubmed/26820292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
Cooper, Janine A.
Moriarty, Frank
Ryan, Cristín
Smith, Susan M.
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Wallace, Emma
Cahir, Caitriona
Williams, David
Teeling, Mary
Hughes, Carmel M.
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria
title Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria
title_full Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria
title_fullStr Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria
title_full_unstemmed Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria
title_short Potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the PROMPT criteria
title_sort potentially inappropriate prescribing in two populations with differing socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional database study using the prompt criteria
topic Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26820292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-2003-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperjaninea potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT moriartyfrank potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT ryancristin potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT smithsusanm potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT bennettkathleen potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT faheytom potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT wallaceemma potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT cahircaitriona potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT williamsdavid potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT teelingmary potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria
AT hughescarmelm potentiallyinappropriateprescribingintwopopulationswithdifferingsocioeconomicprofilesacrosssectionaldatabasestudyusingthepromptcriteria