Cargando…

t(4) report(): Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data

Read-across, i.e. filling toxicological data gaps by relating to similar chemicals, for which test data are available, is usually done based on chemical similarity. Besides structure and physico-chemical properties, however, biological similarity based on biological data adds extra strength to this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Hao, Bouhifd, Mounir, Kleinstreuer, Nicole, Kroese, E. Dinant, Liu, Zhichao, Luechtefeld, Thomas, Pamies, David, Shen, Jie, Strauss, Volker, Wu, Shengde, Hartung, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26863516
http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1601252
_version_ 1782427459114762240
author Zhu, Hao
Bouhifd, Mounir
Kleinstreuer, Nicole
Kroese, E. Dinant
Liu, Zhichao
Luechtefeld, Thomas
Pamies, David
Shen, Jie
Strauss, Volker
Wu, Shengde
Hartung, Thomas
author_facet Zhu, Hao
Bouhifd, Mounir
Kleinstreuer, Nicole
Kroese, E. Dinant
Liu, Zhichao
Luechtefeld, Thomas
Pamies, David
Shen, Jie
Strauss, Volker
Wu, Shengde
Hartung, Thomas
author_sort Zhu, Hao
collection PubMed
description Read-across, i.e. filling toxicological data gaps by relating to similar chemicals, for which test data are available, is usually done based on chemical similarity. Besides structure and physico-chemical properties, however, biological similarity based on biological data adds extra strength to this process. In the context of developing Good Read-Across Practice guidance, a number of case studies were evaluated to demonstrate the use of biological data to enrich read-across. In the simplest case, chemically similar substances also show similar test results in relevant in vitro assays. This is a well-established method for the read-across of e.g. genotoxicity assays. Larger datasets of biological and toxicological properties of hundreds and thousands of substances become increasingly available enabling big data approaches in read-across studies. Several case studies using various big data sources are described in this paper. An example is given for the US EPA’s ToxCast dataset allowing read-across for high quality uterotrophic assays for estrogenic endocrine disruption. Similarly, an example for REACH registration data enhancing read-across for acute toxicity studies is given. A different approach is taken using omics data to establish biological similarity: Examples are given for stem cell models in vitro and short-term repeated dose studies in rats in vivo to support read-across and category formation. These preliminary biological data-driven read-across studies highlight the road to the new generation of read-across approaches that can be applied in chemical safety assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48342012016-04-17 t(4) report(): Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data Zhu, Hao Bouhifd, Mounir Kleinstreuer, Nicole Kroese, E. Dinant Liu, Zhichao Luechtefeld, Thomas Pamies, David Shen, Jie Strauss, Volker Wu, Shengde Hartung, Thomas ALTEX Article Read-across, i.e. filling toxicological data gaps by relating to similar chemicals, for which test data are available, is usually done based on chemical similarity. Besides structure and physico-chemical properties, however, biological similarity based on biological data adds extra strength to this process. In the context of developing Good Read-Across Practice guidance, a number of case studies were evaluated to demonstrate the use of biological data to enrich read-across. In the simplest case, chemically similar substances also show similar test results in relevant in vitro assays. This is a well-established method for the read-across of e.g. genotoxicity assays. Larger datasets of biological and toxicological properties of hundreds and thousands of substances become increasingly available enabling big data approaches in read-across studies. Several case studies using various big data sources are described in this paper. An example is given for the US EPA’s ToxCast dataset allowing read-across for high quality uterotrophic assays for estrogenic endocrine disruption. Similarly, an example for REACH registration data enhancing read-across for acute toxicity studies is given. A different approach is taken using omics data to establish biological similarity: Examples are given for stem cell models in vitro and short-term repeated dose studies in rats in vivo to support read-across and category formation. These preliminary biological data-driven read-across studies highlight the road to the new generation of read-across approaches that can be applied in chemical safety assessment. 2016-02-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4834201/ /pubmed/26863516 http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1601252 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is appropriately cited.
spellingShingle Article
Zhu, Hao
Bouhifd, Mounir
Kleinstreuer, Nicole
Kroese, E. Dinant
Liu, Zhichao
Luechtefeld, Thomas
Pamies, David
Shen, Jie
Strauss, Volker
Wu, Shengde
Hartung, Thomas
t(4) report(): Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data
title t(4) report(): Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data
title_full t(4) report(): Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data
title_fullStr t(4) report(): Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data
title_full_unstemmed t(4) report(): Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data
title_short t(4) report(): Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data
title_sort t(4) report(): supporting read-across using biological data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26863516
http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1601252
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuhao t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT bouhifdmounir t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT kleinstreuernicole t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT kroeseedinant t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT liuzhichao t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT luechtefeldthomas t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT pamiesdavid t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT shenjie t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT straussvolker t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT wushengde t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata
AT hartungthomas t4reportsupportingreadacrossusingbiologicaldata