Cargando…
Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and intubation frequently used for airway management during general anesthesia, is frequently associated with undesirable hemodynamic disturbances. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of etomidate, combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-keta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kowsar
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110526 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.30071 |
_version_ | 1782427485017735168 |
---|---|
author | Gholipour Baradari, Afshin Firouzian, Abolfazl Zamani Kiasari, Alieh Aarabi, Mohsen Emadi, Seyed Abdollah Davanlou, Ali Motamed, Nima Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh |
author_facet | Gholipour Baradari, Afshin Firouzian, Abolfazl Zamani Kiasari, Alieh Aarabi, Mohsen Emadi, Seyed Abdollah Davanlou, Ali Motamed, Nima Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh |
author_sort | Gholipour Baradari, Afshin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and intubation frequently used for airway management during general anesthesia, is frequently associated with undesirable hemodynamic disturbances. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of etomidate, combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-ketamine as induction agents on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a double blind, randomized clinical trial a total of 120 adult patients of both sexes, aged 18 - 45 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned into three equally sized groups. Patients in group A received etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) plus normal saline as placebo. Patients in group B and C received propofol (1.5 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and thiopental sodium (3 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), respectively for anesthesia induction. Before laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, immediately after, and also one and three minutes after the procedures, hemodynamic values (SBP, DBP, MAP and HR) were measured. RESULTS: A repeated measurement ANOVA showed significant changes in mean SBP and DBP between the time points (P < 0.05). In addition, the main effect of MAP and HR were statistically significant during the course of study (P < 0.05). Furthermore, after induction of anesthesia, the three study groups had significantly different SBP, DBP and MAP changes overtime (P < 0.05). However, HR changes over time were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Combination of propofol-ketamine had superior hemodynamic stability compared to other induction agents. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of propofol-ketamine may be recommended as an effective and safe induction agent for attenuating hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with better hemodynamic stability. Although, further well-designed randomized clinical trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of this combination, especially in critically ill patients or patients with cardiovascular disease, are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4834424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Kowsar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48344242016-04-22 Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial Gholipour Baradari, Afshin Firouzian, Abolfazl Zamani Kiasari, Alieh Aarabi, Mohsen Emadi, Seyed Abdollah Davanlou, Ali Motamed, Nima Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and intubation frequently used for airway management during general anesthesia, is frequently associated with undesirable hemodynamic disturbances. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of etomidate, combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-ketamine as induction agents on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a double blind, randomized clinical trial a total of 120 adult patients of both sexes, aged 18 - 45 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned into three equally sized groups. Patients in group A received etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) plus normal saline as placebo. Patients in group B and C received propofol (1.5 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and thiopental sodium (3 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), respectively for anesthesia induction. Before laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, immediately after, and also one and three minutes after the procedures, hemodynamic values (SBP, DBP, MAP and HR) were measured. RESULTS: A repeated measurement ANOVA showed significant changes in mean SBP and DBP between the time points (P < 0.05). In addition, the main effect of MAP and HR were statistically significant during the course of study (P < 0.05). Furthermore, after induction of anesthesia, the three study groups had significantly different SBP, DBP and MAP changes overtime (P < 0.05). However, HR changes over time were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Combination of propofol-ketamine had superior hemodynamic stability compared to other induction agents. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of propofol-ketamine may be recommended as an effective and safe induction agent for attenuating hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with better hemodynamic stability. Although, further well-designed randomized clinical trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of this combination, especially in critically ill patients or patients with cardiovascular disease, are warranted. Kowsar 2016-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4834424/ /pubmed/27110526 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.30071 Text en Copyright © 2016, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gholipour Baradari, Afshin Firouzian, Abolfazl Zamani Kiasari, Alieh Aarabi, Mohsen Emadi, Seyed Abdollah Davanlou, Ali Motamed, Nima Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial |
title | Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial |
title_full | Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial |
title_short | Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial |
title_sort | effect of etomidate versus combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-ketamine on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation: a randomized double blind clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110526 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.30071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gholipourbaradariafshin effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT firouzianabolfazl effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT zamanikiasarialieh effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT aarabimohsen effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT emadiseyedabdollah effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT davanlouali effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT motamednima effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT yousefiabdolmalekiensieh effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial |