Cargando…

Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and intubation frequently used for airway management during general anesthesia, is frequently associated with undesirable hemodynamic disturbances. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of etomidate, combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-keta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gholipour Baradari, Afshin, Firouzian, Abolfazl, Zamani Kiasari, Alieh, Aarabi, Mohsen, Emadi, Seyed Abdollah, Davanlou, Ali, Motamed, Nima, Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110526
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.30071
_version_ 1782427485017735168
author Gholipour Baradari, Afshin
Firouzian, Abolfazl
Zamani Kiasari, Alieh
Aarabi, Mohsen
Emadi, Seyed Abdollah
Davanlou, Ali
Motamed, Nima
Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh
author_facet Gholipour Baradari, Afshin
Firouzian, Abolfazl
Zamani Kiasari, Alieh
Aarabi, Mohsen
Emadi, Seyed Abdollah
Davanlou, Ali
Motamed, Nima
Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh
author_sort Gholipour Baradari, Afshin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and intubation frequently used for airway management during general anesthesia, is frequently associated with undesirable hemodynamic disturbances. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of etomidate, combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-ketamine as induction agents on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a double blind, randomized clinical trial a total of 120 adult patients of both sexes, aged 18 - 45 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned into three equally sized groups. Patients in group A received etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) plus normal saline as placebo. Patients in group B and C received propofol (1.5 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and thiopental sodium (3 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), respectively for anesthesia induction. Before laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, immediately after, and also one and three minutes after the procedures, hemodynamic values (SBP, DBP, MAP and HR) were measured. RESULTS: A repeated measurement ANOVA showed significant changes in mean SBP and DBP between the time points (P < 0.05). In addition, the main effect of MAP and HR were statistically significant during the course of study (P < 0.05). Furthermore, after induction of anesthesia, the three study groups had significantly different SBP, DBP and MAP changes overtime (P < 0.05). However, HR changes over time were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Combination of propofol-ketamine had superior hemodynamic stability compared to other induction agents. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of propofol-ketamine may be recommended as an effective and safe induction agent for attenuating hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with better hemodynamic stability. Although, further well-designed randomized clinical trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of this combination, especially in critically ill patients or patients with cardiovascular disease, are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48344242016-04-22 Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial Gholipour Baradari, Afshin Firouzian, Abolfazl Zamani Kiasari, Alieh Aarabi, Mohsen Emadi, Seyed Abdollah Davanlou, Ali Motamed, Nima Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and intubation frequently used for airway management during general anesthesia, is frequently associated with undesirable hemodynamic disturbances. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of etomidate, combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-ketamine as induction agents on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a double blind, randomized clinical trial a total of 120 adult patients of both sexes, aged 18 - 45 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned into three equally sized groups. Patients in group A received etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) plus normal saline as placebo. Patients in group B and C received propofol (1.5 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and thiopental sodium (3 mg/kg) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), respectively for anesthesia induction. Before laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, immediately after, and also one and three minutes after the procedures, hemodynamic values (SBP, DBP, MAP and HR) were measured. RESULTS: A repeated measurement ANOVA showed significant changes in mean SBP and DBP between the time points (P < 0.05). In addition, the main effect of MAP and HR were statistically significant during the course of study (P < 0.05). Furthermore, after induction of anesthesia, the three study groups had significantly different SBP, DBP and MAP changes overtime (P < 0.05). However, HR changes over time were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Combination of propofol-ketamine had superior hemodynamic stability compared to other induction agents. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of propofol-ketamine may be recommended as an effective and safe induction agent for attenuating hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with better hemodynamic stability. Although, further well-designed randomized clinical trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of this combination, especially in critically ill patients or patients with cardiovascular disease, are warranted. Kowsar 2016-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4834424/ /pubmed/27110526 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.30071 Text en Copyright © 2016, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gholipour Baradari, Afshin
Firouzian, Abolfazl
Zamani Kiasari, Alieh
Aarabi, Mohsen
Emadi, Seyed Abdollah
Davanlou, Ali
Motamed, Nima
Yousefi Abdolmaleki, Ensieh
Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
title Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
title_full Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
title_short Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
title_sort effect of etomidate versus combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-ketamine on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation: a randomized double blind clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110526
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.30071
work_keys_str_mv AT gholipourbaradariafshin effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT firouzianabolfazl effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT zamanikiasarialieh effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT aarabimohsen effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT emadiseyedabdollah effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT davanlouali effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT motamednima effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT yousefiabdolmalekiensieh effectofetomidateversuscombinationofpropofolketamineandthiopentalketamineonhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandintubationarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial