Cargando…
Validity of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans
OBJECTIVES: Optimal depression screening necessitates measurement tools that are valid across varied populations and in the presence of comorbidities. METHODS: This study assessed the test properties of two versions of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale against psychiatric diagnos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116643906 |
_version_ | 1782427491871227904 |
---|---|
author | Quiñones, Ana R Thielke, Stephen M Clark, Michael E Phillips, Kristin M Elnitsky, Christine Andresen, Elena M |
author_facet | Quiñones, Ana R Thielke, Stephen M Clark, Michael E Phillips, Kristin M Elnitsky, Christine Andresen, Elena M |
author_sort | Quiñones, Ana R |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Optimal depression screening necessitates measurement tools that are valid across varied populations and in the presence of comorbidities. METHODS: This study assessed the test properties of two versions of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale against psychiatric diagnoses established by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview among a clinical sample of US Veterans deployed during Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn. Participants (N = 359) recruited from two Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals completed a clinical interview, structured diagnostic interview, and self-reported measures. RESULTS: Based on diagnostic interview and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition criteria, 29.5% of the sample met diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder and 26.5% met diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder. Both Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 scales performed well and almost identically against the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-major depressive disorder in identifying Veterans with major depressive disorder (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve 91%; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 area under the ROC curve 90%). Overall, higher cut points for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scales performed better in correctly identifying true positives and true negatives for major depressive disorder (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 cut point 18+ sensitivity 92% specificity 72%; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 cut point 10+ sensitivity 92% specificity 69%). CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scales was poor among Veterans with co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder (13% and 16%). Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder who have a positive depression screen should have a more thorough assessment of mental health symptoms and comorbidities, rather than immediate diagnosis of and treatment for depression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4834469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48344692016-04-28 Validity of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans Quiñones, Ana R Thielke, Stephen M Clark, Michael E Phillips, Kristin M Elnitsky, Christine Andresen, Elena M SAGE Open Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: Optimal depression screening necessitates measurement tools that are valid across varied populations and in the presence of comorbidities. METHODS: This study assessed the test properties of two versions of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale against psychiatric diagnoses established by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview among a clinical sample of US Veterans deployed during Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn. Participants (N = 359) recruited from two Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals completed a clinical interview, structured diagnostic interview, and self-reported measures. RESULTS: Based on diagnostic interview and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition criteria, 29.5% of the sample met diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder and 26.5% met diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder. Both Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 scales performed well and almost identically against the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-major depressive disorder in identifying Veterans with major depressive disorder (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve 91%; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 area under the ROC curve 90%). Overall, higher cut points for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scales performed better in correctly identifying true positives and true negatives for major depressive disorder (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 cut point 18+ sensitivity 92% specificity 72%; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 cut point 10+ sensitivity 92% specificity 69%). CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scales was poor among Veterans with co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder (13% and 16%). Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder who have a positive depression screen should have a more thorough assessment of mental health symptoms and comorbidities, rather than immediate diagnosis of and treatment for depression. SAGE Publications 2016-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4834469/ /pubmed/27127628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116643906 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Quiñones, Ana R Thielke, Stephen M Clark, Michael E Phillips, Kristin M Elnitsky, Christine Andresen, Elena M Validity of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans |
title | Validity of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans |
title_full | Validity of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans |
title_fullStr | Validity of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans |
title_short | Validity of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans |
title_sort | validity of center for epidemiologic studies depression (ces-d) scale in a sample of iraq and afghanistan veterans |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116643906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quinonesanar validityofcenterforepidemiologicstudiesdepressioncesdscaleinasampleofiraqandafghanistanveterans AT thielkestephenm validityofcenterforepidemiologicstudiesdepressioncesdscaleinasampleofiraqandafghanistanveterans AT clarkmichaele validityofcenterforepidemiologicstudiesdepressioncesdscaleinasampleofiraqandafghanistanveterans AT phillipskristinm validityofcenterforepidemiologicstudiesdepressioncesdscaleinasampleofiraqandafghanistanveterans AT elnitskychristine validityofcenterforepidemiologicstudiesdepressioncesdscaleinasampleofiraqandafghanistanveterans AT andresenelenam validityofcenterforepidemiologicstudiesdepressioncesdscaleinasampleofiraqandafghanistanveterans |