Cargando…

Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, “Facial Expression” and “Critical Care Pain Observation Tool” in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND: Critical-care patients are at higher risk of untreated pain, because they are often unable to communicate owing to altered mental status, tracheal intubation and sedation. OBJECTIVES: This study compared two pain assessment tools on tracheal intubated critically ill patients in a cardiac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiavar, Majid, Azarfarin, Rasoul, Totonchi, Ziae, Tavakoli, Fatemeh, Alizadehasl, Azin, Teymouri, Mitra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110536
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.33434
_version_ 1782427502739718144
author Kiavar, Majid
Azarfarin, Rasoul
Totonchi, Ziae
Tavakoli, Fatemeh
Alizadehasl, Azin
Teymouri, Mitra
author_facet Kiavar, Majid
Azarfarin, Rasoul
Totonchi, Ziae
Tavakoli, Fatemeh
Alizadehasl, Azin
Teymouri, Mitra
author_sort Kiavar, Majid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Critical-care patients are at higher risk of untreated pain, because they are often unable to communicate owing to altered mental status, tracheal intubation and sedation. OBJECTIVES: This study compared two pain assessment tools on tracheal intubated critically ill patients in a cardiac post-anesthesia care unit, who were unable to communicate verbally. The studied tools were “critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT)” and “facial expression (FE)”. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study based on diagnostic test evaluation. A sample of 91 intubated patients was selected from cardiac post-anesthesia care unit. Collected data were demographic characteristics, vital signs, FE and CPOT tools’ scale. Pain was assessed with CPOT and FE scores five times. The first assessment was performed in at least 3 hours after admission of patients to ICU. Then, the pain intensity was reassessed every 30 minutes. In addition, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation were measured simultaneously. RESULTS: At the first period, the frequency of “severe” pain intensity using the CPOT was 58.2% and with the FE tool was 67% (P = 0.001). Both tools demonstrated reduction in severity of pain on second and third assessment times. Significantly increasing level of pain and blood pressure due to nursing painful procedures (endo-tracheal suctioning, changing patient’s position, etc.), were obtained by CPOT in fourth assessment. FE was not able to detect such important findings (κ = 0.249). In the fifth step, pain intensity was reduced. The most agreement between the two tools was observed when the reported pain was “severe” (κ = 0.787, P < 0.001) and “mild” (κ = 0.851, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of CPOT was higher for detection and evaluation of pain in intubated postoperative patients compared with “Facial Expression”. Best agreement between these tools was observed in two extremes of pain intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48345292016-04-22 Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, “Facial Expression” and “Critical Care Pain Observation Tool” in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery Kiavar, Majid Azarfarin, Rasoul Totonchi, Ziae Tavakoli, Fatemeh Alizadehasl, Azin Teymouri, Mitra Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Critical-care patients are at higher risk of untreated pain, because they are often unable to communicate owing to altered mental status, tracheal intubation and sedation. OBJECTIVES: This study compared two pain assessment tools on tracheal intubated critically ill patients in a cardiac post-anesthesia care unit, who were unable to communicate verbally. The studied tools were “critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT)” and “facial expression (FE)”. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study based on diagnostic test evaluation. A sample of 91 intubated patients was selected from cardiac post-anesthesia care unit. Collected data were demographic characteristics, vital signs, FE and CPOT tools’ scale. Pain was assessed with CPOT and FE scores five times. The first assessment was performed in at least 3 hours after admission of patients to ICU. Then, the pain intensity was reassessed every 30 minutes. In addition, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation were measured simultaneously. RESULTS: At the first period, the frequency of “severe” pain intensity using the CPOT was 58.2% and with the FE tool was 67% (P = 0.001). Both tools demonstrated reduction in severity of pain on second and third assessment times. Significantly increasing level of pain and blood pressure due to nursing painful procedures (endo-tracheal suctioning, changing patient’s position, etc.), were obtained by CPOT in fourth assessment. FE was not able to detect such important findings (κ = 0.249). In the fifth step, pain intensity was reduced. The most agreement between the two tools was observed when the reported pain was “severe” (κ = 0.787, P < 0.001) and “mild” (κ = 0.851, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of CPOT was higher for detection and evaluation of pain in intubated postoperative patients compared with “Facial Expression”. Best agreement between these tools was observed in two extremes of pain intensity. Kowsar 2016-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4834529/ /pubmed/27110536 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.33434 Text en Copyright © 2016, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kiavar, Majid
Azarfarin, Rasoul
Totonchi, Ziae
Tavakoli, Fatemeh
Alizadehasl, Azin
Teymouri, Mitra
Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, “Facial Expression” and “Critical Care Pain Observation Tool” in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery
title Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, “Facial Expression” and “Critical Care Pain Observation Tool” in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery
title_full Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, “Facial Expression” and “Critical Care Pain Observation Tool” in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, “Facial Expression” and “Critical Care Pain Observation Tool” in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, “Facial Expression” and “Critical Care Pain Observation Tool” in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery
title_short Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, “Facial Expression” and “Critical Care Pain Observation Tool” in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery
title_sort comparison of two pain assessment tools, “facial expression” and “critical care pain observation tool” in intubated patients after cardiac surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110536
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.33434
work_keys_str_mv AT kiavarmajid comparisonoftwopainassessmenttoolsfacialexpressionandcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinintubatedpatientsaftercardiacsurgery
AT azarfarinrasoul comparisonoftwopainassessmenttoolsfacialexpressionandcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinintubatedpatientsaftercardiacsurgery
AT totonchiziae comparisonoftwopainassessmenttoolsfacialexpressionandcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinintubatedpatientsaftercardiacsurgery
AT tavakolifatemeh comparisonoftwopainassessmenttoolsfacialexpressionandcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinintubatedpatientsaftercardiacsurgery
AT alizadehaslazin comparisonoftwopainassessmenttoolsfacialexpressionandcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinintubatedpatientsaftercardiacsurgery
AT teymourimitra comparisonoftwopainassessmenttoolsfacialexpressionandcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinintubatedpatientsaftercardiacsurgery