Cargando…

Discrepancy between Clinical and Final Pathological Evaluation Findings in Early Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

PURPOSE: Early gastric cancer cases that are estimated to meet indications for treatment before endoscopic submucosal resection are often revealed to be out-of-indication after the treatment. We investigated the short-term treatment outcomes in patients with early gastric cancer according to the pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Young-Il, Kim, Hyoung Sang, Kook, Myeong-Cherl, Cho, Soo-Jeong, Lee, Jong Yeul, Kim, Chan Gyoo, Ryu, Keun Won, Kim, Young-Woo, Choi, Il Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104025
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.34
_version_ 1782427516594552832
author Kim, Young-Il
Kim, Hyoung Sang
Kook, Myeong-Cherl
Cho, Soo-Jeong
Lee, Jong Yeul
Kim, Chan Gyoo
Ryu, Keun Won
Kim, Young-Woo
Choi, Il Ju
author_facet Kim, Young-Il
Kim, Hyoung Sang
Kook, Myeong-Cherl
Cho, Soo-Jeong
Lee, Jong Yeul
Kim, Chan Gyoo
Ryu, Keun Won
Kim, Young-Woo
Choi, Il Ju
author_sort Kim, Young-Il
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Early gastric cancer cases that are estimated to meet indications for treatment before endoscopic submucosal resection are often revealed to be out-of-indication after the treatment. We investigated the short-term treatment outcomes in patients with early gastric cancer according to the pretreatment clinical endoscopic submucosal resection indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with early gastric cancer that met the pretreatment endoscopic submucosal resection indications, from 2004 to 2011. Curative resection rate and proportion of out-of-indication cases were compared according to the pre-endoscopic submucosal resection indications. Pre-endoscopic submucosal resection factors associated with out-of-indication in the final pathological examination were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 756 cases, 660 had absolute and 96 had expanded pre-endoscopic submucosal resection indications. The curative resection rate was significantly lower in the patients with expanded indications (64.6%) than in those with absolute indications (81.7%; P<0.001). The cases with expanded indications (30.2%) were revealed to be out-of-indication more frequently than the cases with absolute indications (13.8%; P<0.001). Age of >65 years, tumor size of >2 cm, tumor location in the upper-third segment of the stomach, and undifferentiated histological type in pre-endoscopic submucosal resection evaluations were significant risk factors for out-of-indication after endoscopic submucosal resection. CONCLUSIONS: Non-curative resection due to out-of-indication occurred in approximately one-third of the early gastric cancer cases that clinically met the expanded indications before endoscopic submucosal resection. The possibility of additional surgery should be emphasized for patients with early gastric cancers that clinically meet the expanded indications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48346192016-04-21 Discrepancy between Clinical and Final Pathological Evaluation Findings in Early Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Kim, Young-Il Kim, Hyoung Sang Kook, Myeong-Cherl Cho, Soo-Jeong Lee, Jong Yeul Kim, Chan Gyoo Ryu, Keun Won Kim, Young-Woo Choi, Il Ju J Gastric Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Early gastric cancer cases that are estimated to meet indications for treatment before endoscopic submucosal resection are often revealed to be out-of-indication after the treatment. We investigated the short-term treatment outcomes in patients with early gastric cancer according to the pretreatment clinical endoscopic submucosal resection indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with early gastric cancer that met the pretreatment endoscopic submucosal resection indications, from 2004 to 2011. Curative resection rate and proportion of out-of-indication cases were compared according to the pre-endoscopic submucosal resection indications. Pre-endoscopic submucosal resection factors associated with out-of-indication in the final pathological examination were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 756 cases, 660 had absolute and 96 had expanded pre-endoscopic submucosal resection indications. The curative resection rate was significantly lower in the patients with expanded indications (64.6%) than in those with absolute indications (81.7%; P<0.001). The cases with expanded indications (30.2%) were revealed to be out-of-indication more frequently than the cases with absolute indications (13.8%; P<0.001). Age of >65 years, tumor size of >2 cm, tumor location in the upper-third segment of the stomach, and undifferentiated histological type in pre-endoscopic submucosal resection evaluations were significant risk factors for out-of-indication after endoscopic submucosal resection. CONCLUSIONS: Non-curative resection due to out-of-indication occurred in approximately one-third of the early gastric cancer cases that clinically met the expanded indications before endoscopic submucosal resection. The possibility of additional surgery should be emphasized for patients with early gastric cancers that clinically meet the expanded indications. The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016-03 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4834619/ /pubmed/27104025 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.34 Text en Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Young-Il
Kim, Hyoung Sang
Kook, Myeong-Cherl
Cho, Soo-Jeong
Lee, Jong Yeul
Kim, Chan Gyoo
Ryu, Keun Won
Kim, Young-Woo
Choi, Il Ju
Discrepancy between Clinical and Final Pathological Evaluation Findings in Early Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title Discrepancy between Clinical and Final Pathological Evaluation Findings in Early Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full Discrepancy between Clinical and Final Pathological Evaluation Findings in Early Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_fullStr Discrepancy between Clinical and Final Pathological Evaluation Findings in Early Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy between Clinical and Final Pathological Evaluation Findings in Early Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_short Discrepancy between Clinical and Final Pathological Evaluation Findings in Early Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_sort discrepancy between clinical and final pathological evaluation findings in early gastric cancer patients treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104025
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.34
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoungil discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kimhyoungsang discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kookmyeongcherl discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT chosoojeong discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT leejongyeul discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kimchangyoo discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT ryukeunwon discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kimyoungwoo discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT choiilju discrepancybetweenclinicalandfinalpathologicalevaluationfindingsinearlygastriccancerpatientstreatedwithendoscopicsubmucosaldissection