Cargando…

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis

BACKGROUND: To compare the diagnostic values of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in staging hepatic fibrosis (HF) in an animal model. METHODS: This study consisted of 44 rabbits served as HF group and 9 normal rabbits. HF group was divided into two subgroups...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Li-Qiu, Chen, Jie, Pan, Liang, Jiang, Jin-Zhao, Xing, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25698193
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.151659
_version_ 1782427539062390784
author Zou, Li-Qiu
Chen, Jie
Pan, Liang
Jiang, Jin-Zhao
Xing, Wei
author_facet Zou, Li-Qiu
Chen, Jie
Pan, Liang
Jiang, Jin-Zhao
Xing, Wei
author_sort Zou, Li-Qiu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the diagnostic values of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in staging hepatic fibrosis (HF) in an animal model. METHODS: This study consisted of 44 rabbits served as HF group and 9 normal rabbits. HF group was divided into two subgroups: Group A (n = 32) and Group B (n = 12). Rabbits in Group B were served as a complementary group when rabbits in Group A suddenly died during the study. Rabbits from control and Group A underwent abdominal MR imaging (MRI), MRE, and DWI. In Group A, random eight rabbits underwent MRI examinations at 4, 5, 6, 10 weeks after carbon tetrachloride oil subcutaneous injection. Liver stiffness (LS) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of liver parenchyma were measured. The diagnostic performance of MRE and DWI for staging HF was compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on the basis of the histopathological analysis of HF. RESULTS: Significant differences of LS and DWI values were present among HF stages (P < 0.005). The LS values measured on MRE (r = 0.838, P < 0.001) were more strongly correlated with the HF stages than with ADC values (r = −0.527, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of LS were significantly larger than those of DWI were for discriminating two stages of HF (0.979 vs. 0.712 for ≥ S1, 0.922 vs. 0.699 for ≥ S2). MRE showed higher specificity for predicting all stages of HF compared to DWI. CONCLUSIONS: MRE more strongly correlated with the HF stages than DWI and is more specific in predicting all HF stages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48347722016-04-29 Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis Zou, Li-Qiu Chen, Jie Pan, Liang Jiang, Jin-Zhao Xing, Wei Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare the diagnostic values of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in staging hepatic fibrosis (HF) in an animal model. METHODS: This study consisted of 44 rabbits served as HF group and 9 normal rabbits. HF group was divided into two subgroups: Group A (n = 32) and Group B (n = 12). Rabbits in Group B were served as a complementary group when rabbits in Group A suddenly died during the study. Rabbits from control and Group A underwent abdominal MR imaging (MRI), MRE, and DWI. In Group A, random eight rabbits underwent MRI examinations at 4, 5, 6, 10 weeks after carbon tetrachloride oil subcutaneous injection. Liver stiffness (LS) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of liver parenchyma were measured. The diagnostic performance of MRE and DWI for staging HF was compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on the basis of the histopathological analysis of HF. RESULTS: Significant differences of LS and DWI values were present among HF stages (P < 0.005). The LS values measured on MRE (r = 0.838, P < 0.001) were more strongly correlated with the HF stages than with ADC values (r = −0.527, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of LS were significantly larger than those of DWI were for discriminating two stages of HF (0.979 vs. 0.712 for ≥ S1, 0.922 vs. 0.699 for ≥ S2). MRE showed higher specificity for predicting all stages of HF compared to DWI. CONCLUSIONS: MRE more strongly correlated with the HF stages than DWI and is more specific in predicting all HF stages. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4834772/ /pubmed/25698193 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.151659 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zou, Li-Qiu
Chen, Jie
Pan, Liang
Jiang, Jin-Zhao
Xing, Wei
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_full Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_fullStr Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_short Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis
title_sort comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for staging hepatic fibrosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25698193
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.151659
work_keys_str_mv AT zouliqiu comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT chenjie comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT panliang comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT jiangjinzhao comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT xingwei comparisonofmagneticresonanceelastographyanddiffusionweightedimagingforstaginghepaticfibrosis