Cargando…
Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
INTRODUCTION: There is emerging evidence that brain atrophy is a part of the pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and correlates with several clinical outcomes of the disease, both physical and cognitive. Consequently, brain atrophy is becoming an important parameter in patients' follow‐u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.422 |
_version_ | 1782427550672224256 |
---|---|
author | Lysandropoulos, Andreas P. Absil, Julie Metens, Thierry Mavroudakis, Nicolas Guisset, François Van Vlierberghe, Eline Smeets, Dirk David, Philippe Maertens, Anke Van Hecke, Wim |
author_facet | Lysandropoulos, Andreas P. Absil, Julie Metens, Thierry Mavroudakis, Nicolas Guisset, François Van Vlierberghe, Eline Smeets, Dirk David, Philippe Maertens, Anke Van Hecke, Wim |
author_sort | Lysandropoulos, Andreas P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is emerging evidence that brain atrophy is a part of the pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and correlates with several clinical outcomes of the disease, both physical and cognitive. Consequently, brain atrophy is becoming an important parameter in patients' follow‐up. Since in clinical practice both 1.5Tesla (T) and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems are used for MS patients follow‐up, questions arise regarding compatibility and a possible need for standardization. METHODS: Therefore, in this study 18 MS patients were scanned on the same day on a 1.5T and a 3T scanner. For each scanner, a 3D T1 and a 3D FLAIR were acquired. As no atrophy is expected within 1 day, these datasets can be used to evaluate the median percentage error of the brain volume measurement for gray matter (GM) volume and parenchymal volume (PV) between 1.5T and 3T scanners. The results are obtained with MSmetrix, which is developed especially for use in the MS clinical care path, and compared to Siena (FSL), a widely used software for research purposes. RESULTS: The MSmetrix median percentage error of the brain volume measurement between a 1.5T and a 3T scanner is 0.52% for GM and 0.35% for PV. For Siena this error equals 2.99%. When data of the same scanner are compared, the error is in the order of 0.06–0.08% for both MSmetrix and Siena. CONCLUSIONS: MSmetrix appears robust on both the 1.5T and 3T systems and the measurement error becomes an order of magnitude higher between scanners with different field strength. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4834931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48349312016-04-22 Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging Lysandropoulos, Andreas P. Absil, Julie Metens, Thierry Mavroudakis, Nicolas Guisset, François Van Vlierberghe, Eline Smeets, Dirk David, Philippe Maertens, Anke Van Hecke, Wim Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: There is emerging evidence that brain atrophy is a part of the pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and correlates with several clinical outcomes of the disease, both physical and cognitive. Consequently, brain atrophy is becoming an important parameter in patients' follow‐up. Since in clinical practice both 1.5Tesla (T) and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems are used for MS patients follow‐up, questions arise regarding compatibility and a possible need for standardization. METHODS: Therefore, in this study 18 MS patients were scanned on the same day on a 1.5T and a 3T scanner. For each scanner, a 3D T1 and a 3D FLAIR were acquired. As no atrophy is expected within 1 day, these datasets can be used to evaluate the median percentage error of the brain volume measurement for gray matter (GM) volume and parenchymal volume (PV) between 1.5T and 3T scanners. The results are obtained with MSmetrix, which is developed especially for use in the MS clinical care path, and compared to Siena (FSL), a widely used software for research purposes. RESULTS: The MSmetrix median percentage error of the brain volume measurement between a 1.5T and a 3T scanner is 0.52% for GM and 0.35% for PV. For Siena this error equals 2.99%. When data of the same scanner are compared, the error is in the order of 0.06–0.08% for both MSmetrix and Siena. CONCLUSIONS: MSmetrix appears robust on both the 1.5T and 3T systems and the measurement error becomes an order of magnitude higher between scanners with different field strength. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4834931/ /pubmed/27110445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.422 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lysandropoulos, Andreas P. Absil, Julie Metens, Thierry Mavroudakis, Nicolas Guisset, François Van Vlierberghe, Eline Smeets, Dirk David, Philippe Maertens, Anke Van Hecke, Wim Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | quantifying brain volumes for multiple sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lysandropoulosandreasp quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT absiljulie quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT metensthierry quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT mavroudakisnicolas quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT guissetfrancois quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT vanvlierbergheeline quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT smeetsdirk quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT davidphilippe quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT maertensanke quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT vanheckewim quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging |