Cargando…

Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

INTRODUCTION: There is emerging evidence that brain atrophy is a part of the pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and correlates with several clinical outcomes of the disease, both physical and cognitive. Consequently, brain atrophy is becoming an important parameter in patients' follow‐u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lysandropoulos, Andreas P., Absil, Julie, Metens, Thierry, Mavroudakis, Nicolas, Guisset, François, Van Vlierberghe, Eline, Smeets, Dirk, David, Philippe, Maertens, Anke, Van Hecke, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.422
_version_ 1782427550672224256
author Lysandropoulos, Andreas P.
Absil, Julie
Metens, Thierry
Mavroudakis, Nicolas
Guisset, François
Van Vlierberghe, Eline
Smeets, Dirk
David, Philippe
Maertens, Anke
Van Hecke, Wim
author_facet Lysandropoulos, Andreas P.
Absil, Julie
Metens, Thierry
Mavroudakis, Nicolas
Guisset, François
Van Vlierberghe, Eline
Smeets, Dirk
David, Philippe
Maertens, Anke
Van Hecke, Wim
author_sort Lysandropoulos, Andreas P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is emerging evidence that brain atrophy is a part of the pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and correlates with several clinical outcomes of the disease, both physical and cognitive. Consequently, brain atrophy is becoming an important parameter in patients' follow‐up. Since in clinical practice both 1.5Tesla (T) and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems are used for MS patients follow‐up, questions arise regarding compatibility and a possible need for standardization. METHODS: Therefore, in this study 18 MS patients were scanned on the same day on a 1.5T and a 3T scanner. For each scanner, a 3D T1 and a 3D FLAIR were acquired. As no atrophy is expected within 1 day, these datasets can be used to evaluate the median percentage error of the brain volume measurement for gray matter (GM) volume and parenchymal volume (PV) between 1.5T and 3T scanners. The results are obtained with MSmetrix, which is developed especially for use in the MS clinical care path, and compared to Siena (FSL), a widely used software for research purposes. RESULTS: The MSmetrix median percentage error of the brain volume measurement between a 1.5T and a 3T scanner is 0.52% for GM and 0.35% for PV. For Siena this error equals 2.99%. When data of the same scanner are compared, the error is in the order of 0.06–0.08% for both MSmetrix and Siena. CONCLUSIONS: MSmetrix appears robust on both the 1.5T and 3T systems and the measurement error becomes an order of magnitude higher between scanners with different field strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48349312016-04-22 Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging Lysandropoulos, Andreas P. Absil, Julie Metens, Thierry Mavroudakis, Nicolas Guisset, François Van Vlierberghe, Eline Smeets, Dirk David, Philippe Maertens, Anke Van Hecke, Wim Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: There is emerging evidence that brain atrophy is a part of the pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and correlates with several clinical outcomes of the disease, both physical and cognitive. Consequently, brain atrophy is becoming an important parameter in patients' follow‐up. Since in clinical practice both 1.5Tesla (T) and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems are used for MS patients follow‐up, questions arise regarding compatibility and a possible need for standardization. METHODS: Therefore, in this study 18 MS patients were scanned on the same day on a 1.5T and a 3T scanner. For each scanner, a 3D T1 and a 3D FLAIR were acquired. As no atrophy is expected within 1 day, these datasets can be used to evaluate the median percentage error of the brain volume measurement for gray matter (GM) volume and parenchymal volume (PV) between 1.5T and 3T scanners. The results are obtained with MSmetrix, which is developed especially for use in the MS clinical care path, and compared to Siena (FSL), a widely used software for research purposes. RESULTS: The MSmetrix median percentage error of the brain volume measurement between a 1.5T and a 3T scanner is 0.52% for GM and 0.35% for PV. For Siena this error equals 2.99%. When data of the same scanner are compared, the error is in the order of 0.06–0.08% for both MSmetrix and Siena. CONCLUSIONS: MSmetrix appears robust on both the 1.5T and 3T systems and the measurement error becomes an order of magnitude higher between scanners with different field strength. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4834931/ /pubmed/27110445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.422 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lysandropoulos, Andreas P.
Absil, Julie
Metens, Thierry
Mavroudakis, Nicolas
Guisset, François
Van Vlierberghe, Eline
Smeets, Dirk
David, Philippe
Maertens, Anke
Van Hecke, Wim
Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
title Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort quantifying brain volumes for multiple sclerosis patients follow‐up in clinical practice – comparison of 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.422
work_keys_str_mv AT lysandropoulosandreasp quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT absiljulie quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT metensthierry quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT mavroudakisnicolas quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT guissetfrancois quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT vanvlierbergheeline quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT smeetsdirk quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT davidphilippe quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT maertensanke quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT vanheckewim quantifyingbrainvolumesformultiplesclerosispatientsfollowupinclinicalpracticecomparisonof15and3teslamagneticresonanceimaging