Cargando…

The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing

A central tenet in support of research reproducibility is the ability to uniquely identify research resources, that is, reagents, tools, and materials that are used to perform experiments. However, current reporting practices for research resources are insufficient to identify the exact resources th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bandrowski, Anita, Brush, Matthew, Grethe, Jeffery S., Haendel, Melissa A., Kennedy, David N., Hill, Sean, Hof, Patrick R., Martone, Maryann E., Pols, Maaike, Tan, Serena C., Washington, Nicole, Zudilova‐Seinstra, Elena, Vasilevsky, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.417
_version_ 1782427552713801728
author Bandrowski, Anita
Brush, Matthew
Grethe, Jeffery S.
Haendel, Melissa A.
Kennedy, David N.
Hill, Sean
Hof, Patrick R.
Martone, Maryann E.
Pols, Maaike
Tan, Serena C.
Washington, Nicole
Zudilova‐Seinstra, Elena
Vasilevsky, Nicole
author_facet Bandrowski, Anita
Brush, Matthew
Grethe, Jeffery S.
Haendel, Melissa A.
Kennedy, David N.
Hill, Sean
Hof, Patrick R.
Martone, Maryann E.
Pols, Maaike
Tan, Serena C.
Washington, Nicole
Zudilova‐Seinstra, Elena
Vasilevsky, Nicole
author_sort Bandrowski, Anita
collection PubMed
description A central tenet in support of research reproducibility is the ability to uniquely identify research resources, that is, reagents, tools, and materials that are used to perform experiments. However, current reporting practices for research resources are insufficient to identify the exact resources that are reported or to answer basic questions such as “How did other studies use resource X?” To address this issue, the Resource Identification Initiative was launched as a pilot project to improve the reporting standards for research resources in the methods sections of papers and thereby improve identifiability and scientific reproducibility. The pilot engaged over 25 biomedical journal editors from most major publishers, as well as scientists and funding officials. Authors were asked to include Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) in their manuscripts prior to publication for three resource types: antibodies, model organisms, and tools (i.e., software and databases). RRIDs are assigned by an authoritative database, for example, a model organism database for each type of resource. To make it easier for authors to obtain RRIDs, resources were aggregated from the appropriate databases and their RRIDs made available in a central web portal ( http://scicrunch.org/resources). RRIDs meet three key criteria: they are machine readable, free to generate and access, and are consistent across publishers and journals. The pilot was launched in February of 2014 and over 300 papers have appeared that report RRIDs. The number of journals participating has expanded from the original 25 to more than 40 with RRIDs appearing in 62 different journals to date. Here, we present an overview of the pilot project and its outcomes to date. We show that authors are able to identify resources and are supportive of the goals of the project. Identifiability of the resources post‐pilot showed a dramatic improvement for all three resource types, suggesting that the project has had a significant impact on identifiability of research resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48349422016-04-22 The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing Bandrowski, Anita Brush, Matthew Grethe, Jeffery S. Haendel, Melissa A. Kennedy, David N. Hill, Sean Hof, Patrick R. Martone, Maryann E. Pols, Maaike Tan, Serena C. Washington, Nicole Zudilova‐Seinstra, Elena Vasilevsky, Nicole Brain Behav Editorial A central tenet in support of research reproducibility is the ability to uniquely identify research resources, that is, reagents, tools, and materials that are used to perform experiments. However, current reporting practices for research resources are insufficient to identify the exact resources that are reported or to answer basic questions such as “How did other studies use resource X?” To address this issue, the Resource Identification Initiative was launched as a pilot project to improve the reporting standards for research resources in the methods sections of papers and thereby improve identifiability and scientific reproducibility. The pilot engaged over 25 biomedical journal editors from most major publishers, as well as scientists and funding officials. Authors were asked to include Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) in their manuscripts prior to publication for three resource types: antibodies, model organisms, and tools (i.e., software and databases). RRIDs are assigned by an authoritative database, for example, a model organism database for each type of resource. To make it easier for authors to obtain RRIDs, resources were aggregated from the appropriate databases and their RRIDs made available in a central web portal ( http://scicrunch.org/resources). RRIDs meet three key criteria: they are machine readable, free to generate and access, and are consistent across publishers and journals. The pilot was launched in February of 2014 and over 300 papers have appeared that report RRIDs. The number of journals participating has expanded from the original 25 to more than 40 with RRIDs appearing in 62 different journals to date. Here, we present an overview of the pilot project and its outcomes to date. We show that authors are able to identify resources and are supportive of the goals of the project. Identifiability of the resources post‐pilot showed a dramatic improvement for all three resource types, suggesting that the project has had a significant impact on identifiability of research resources. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4834942/ /pubmed/27110440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.417 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
Bandrowski, Anita
Brush, Matthew
Grethe, Jeffery S.
Haendel, Melissa A.
Kennedy, David N.
Hill, Sean
Hof, Patrick R.
Martone, Maryann E.
Pols, Maaike
Tan, Serena C.
Washington, Nicole
Zudilova‐Seinstra, Elena
Vasilevsky, Nicole
The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing
title The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing
title_full The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing
title_fullStr The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing
title_full_unstemmed The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing
title_short The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing
title_sort resource identification initiative: a cultural shift in publishing
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.417
work_keys_str_mv AT bandrowskianita theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT brushmatthew theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT grethejefferys theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT haendelmelissaa theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT kennedydavidn theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT hillsean theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT hofpatrickr theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT martonemaryanne theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT polsmaaike theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT tanserenac theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT washingtonnicole theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT zudilovaseinstraelena theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT vasilevskynicole theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT theresourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT bandrowskianita resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT brushmatthew resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT grethejefferys resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT haendelmelissaa resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT kennedydavidn resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT hillsean resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT hofpatrickr resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT martonemaryanne resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT polsmaaike resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT tanserenac resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT washingtonnicole resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT zudilovaseinstraelena resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT vasilevskynicole resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing
AT resourceidentificationinitiativeaculturalshiftinpublishing