Cargando…

Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada

The use of treated municipal wastewater residues (biosolids) as fertilizers is an attractive, inexpensive option for growers and farmers. Various regulatory bodies typically employ indicator organisms (fecal coliforms, E. coli and Salmonella) to assess the adequacy and efficiency of the wastewater t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yergeau, Etienne, Masson, Luke, Elias, Miria, Xiang, Shurong, Madey, Ewa, Huang, Hongsheng, Brooks, Brian, Beaudette, Lee A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27089040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153554
_version_ 1782427563636817920
author Yergeau, Etienne
Masson, Luke
Elias, Miria
Xiang, Shurong
Madey, Ewa
Huang, Hongsheng
Brooks, Brian
Beaudette, Lee A.
author_facet Yergeau, Etienne
Masson, Luke
Elias, Miria
Xiang, Shurong
Madey, Ewa
Huang, Hongsheng
Brooks, Brian
Beaudette, Lee A.
author_sort Yergeau, Etienne
collection PubMed
description The use of treated municipal wastewater residues (biosolids) as fertilizers is an attractive, inexpensive option for growers and farmers. Various regulatory bodies typically employ indicator organisms (fecal coliforms, E. coli and Salmonella) to assess the adequacy and efficiency of the wastewater treatment process in reducing pathogen loads in the final product. Molecular detection approaches can offer some advantages over culture-based methods as they can simultaneously detect a wider microbial species range, including non-cultivable microorganisms. However, they cannot directly assess the viability of the pathogens. Here, we used bacterial enumeration methods together with molecular methods including qPCR, 16S rRNA and cpn60 gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing to compare pre- and post-treatment biosolids from two Canadian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Our results show that an anaerobic digestion WWTP was unsuccessful at reducing the live indicator organism load (coliforms, generic E. coli and Salmonella) below acceptable regulatory criteria, while biosolids from a dewatering/pelletization WWTP met these criteria. DNA from other pathogens was detected by the molecular methods, but these species were considered less abundant. Clostridium DNA increased significantly following anaerobic digestion treatments. In addition to pathogen DNA, genes related to virulence and antibiotic resistance were identified in treated biosolids. Shotgun metagenomics revealed the widest range of pathogen DNA and, among the approaches used here, was the only approach that could access functional gene information in treated biosolids. Overall, our results highlight the potential usefulness of amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics as complementary screening methods that could be used in parallel with culture-based methods, although more detailed comparisons across a wider range of sites would be needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4835084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48350842016-04-29 Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada Yergeau, Etienne Masson, Luke Elias, Miria Xiang, Shurong Madey, Ewa Huang, Hongsheng Brooks, Brian Beaudette, Lee A. PLoS One Research Article The use of treated municipal wastewater residues (biosolids) as fertilizers is an attractive, inexpensive option for growers and farmers. Various regulatory bodies typically employ indicator organisms (fecal coliforms, E. coli and Salmonella) to assess the adequacy and efficiency of the wastewater treatment process in reducing pathogen loads in the final product. Molecular detection approaches can offer some advantages over culture-based methods as they can simultaneously detect a wider microbial species range, including non-cultivable microorganisms. However, they cannot directly assess the viability of the pathogens. Here, we used bacterial enumeration methods together with molecular methods including qPCR, 16S rRNA and cpn60 gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing to compare pre- and post-treatment biosolids from two Canadian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Our results show that an anaerobic digestion WWTP was unsuccessful at reducing the live indicator organism load (coliforms, generic E. coli and Salmonella) below acceptable regulatory criteria, while biosolids from a dewatering/pelletization WWTP met these criteria. DNA from other pathogens was detected by the molecular methods, but these species were considered less abundant. Clostridium DNA increased significantly following anaerobic digestion treatments. In addition to pathogen DNA, genes related to virulence and antibiotic resistance were identified in treated biosolids. Shotgun metagenomics revealed the widest range of pathogen DNA and, among the approaches used here, was the only approach that could access functional gene information in treated biosolids. Overall, our results highlight the potential usefulness of amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics as complementary screening methods that could be used in parallel with culture-based methods, although more detailed comparisons across a wider range of sites would be needed. Public Library of Science 2016-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4835084/ /pubmed/27089040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153554 Text en © 2016 Yergeau et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yergeau, Etienne
Masson, Luke
Elias, Miria
Xiang, Shurong
Madey, Ewa
Huang, Hongsheng
Brooks, Brian
Beaudette, Lee A.
Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada
title Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada
title_full Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada
title_fullStr Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada
title_short Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada
title_sort comparison of methods to identify pathogens and associated virulence functional genes in biosolids from two different wastewater treatment facilities in canada
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27089040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153554
work_keys_str_mv AT yergeauetienne comparisonofmethodstoidentifypathogensandassociatedvirulencefunctionalgenesinbiosolidsfromtwodifferentwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesincanada
AT massonluke comparisonofmethodstoidentifypathogensandassociatedvirulencefunctionalgenesinbiosolidsfromtwodifferentwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesincanada
AT eliasmiria comparisonofmethodstoidentifypathogensandassociatedvirulencefunctionalgenesinbiosolidsfromtwodifferentwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesincanada
AT xiangshurong comparisonofmethodstoidentifypathogensandassociatedvirulencefunctionalgenesinbiosolidsfromtwodifferentwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesincanada
AT madeyewa comparisonofmethodstoidentifypathogensandassociatedvirulencefunctionalgenesinbiosolidsfromtwodifferentwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesincanada
AT huanghongsheng comparisonofmethodstoidentifypathogensandassociatedvirulencefunctionalgenesinbiosolidsfromtwodifferentwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesincanada
AT brooksbrian comparisonofmethodstoidentifypathogensandassociatedvirulencefunctionalgenesinbiosolidsfromtwodifferentwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesincanada
AT beaudetteleea comparisonofmethodstoidentifypathogensandassociatedvirulencefunctionalgenesinbiosolidsfromtwodifferentwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesincanada