Cargando…

Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications

OBJECTIVE: To determine the adherence status to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among epilepsy patients; to observe the association between adherence status and age, sex, active ingredient prescribed, treatment period, and number of comorbidities; and to determine the effect of nonadherence on direct med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Karen, Julyan, Marlene, Lubbe, Martie S, Burger, Johanita R, Cockeran, Marike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110104
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S98940
_version_ 1782427577452855296
author Jacobs, Karen
Julyan, Marlene
Lubbe, Martie S
Burger, Johanita R
Cockeran, Marike
author_facet Jacobs, Karen
Julyan, Marlene
Lubbe, Martie S
Burger, Johanita R
Cockeran, Marike
author_sort Jacobs, Karen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the adherence status to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among epilepsy patients; to observe the association between adherence status and age, sex, active ingredient prescribed, treatment period, and number of comorbidities; and to determine the effect of nonadherence on direct medicine treatment cost of AEDs. METHODS: A retrospective study analyzing medicine claims data obtained from a South African pharmaceutical benefit management company was performed. Patients of all ages (N=19,168), who received more than one prescription for an AED, were observed from 2008 to 2013. The modified medicine possession ratio (MPRm) was used as proxy to determine the adherence status to AED treatment. The MPRm was considered acceptable (adherent) if the calculated value was ≥80%, but ≤110%, whereas an MPRm of <80% (unacceptably low) or >110% (unacceptably high) was considered nonadherent. Direct medicine treatment cost was calculated by summing the medical scheme contribution and patient co-payment associated with each AED prescription. RESULTS: Only 55% of AEDs prescribed to 19,168 patients during the study period had an acceptable MPRm. MPRm categories depended on the treatment period (P>0.0001; Cramer’s V=0.208) but were independent of sex (P<0.182; Cramer’s V=0.009). Age group (P<0.0001; Cramer’s V=0.067), active ingredient (P<0.0001; Cramer’s V=0.071), and number of comor-bidities (P<0.0001; Cramer’s V=0.050) were statistically but not practically significantly associated with MPRm categories. AEDs with an unacceptably high MPRm contributed to 3.74% (US$736,376.23) of the total direct cost of all AEDs included in the study, whereas those with an unacceptably low MPRm amounted to US$3,227,894.85 (16.38%). CONCLUSION: Nonadherence to antiepileptic treatment is a major problem, encompassing ~20% of cost in our study. Adherence, however, is likely to improve with the treatment period. Further research is needed to determine the factors influencing epileptic patients’ prescription refill adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4835143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48351432016-04-22 Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications Jacobs, Karen Julyan, Marlene Lubbe, Martie S Burger, Johanita R Cockeran, Marike Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research OBJECTIVE: To determine the adherence status to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among epilepsy patients; to observe the association between adherence status and age, sex, active ingredient prescribed, treatment period, and number of comorbidities; and to determine the effect of nonadherence on direct medicine treatment cost of AEDs. METHODS: A retrospective study analyzing medicine claims data obtained from a South African pharmaceutical benefit management company was performed. Patients of all ages (N=19,168), who received more than one prescription for an AED, were observed from 2008 to 2013. The modified medicine possession ratio (MPRm) was used as proxy to determine the adherence status to AED treatment. The MPRm was considered acceptable (adherent) if the calculated value was ≥80%, but ≤110%, whereas an MPRm of <80% (unacceptably low) or >110% (unacceptably high) was considered nonadherent. Direct medicine treatment cost was calculated by summing the medical scheme contribution and patient co-payment associated with each AED prescription. RESULTS: Only 55% of AEDs prescribed to 19,168 patients during the study period had an acceptable MPRm. MPRm categories depended on the treatment period (P>0.0001; Cramer’s V=0.208) but were independent of sex (P<0.182; Cramer’s V=0.009). Age group (P<0.0001; Cramer’s V=0.067), active ingredient (P<0.0001; Cramer’s V=0.071), and number of comor-bidities (P<0.0001; Cramer’s V=0.050) were statistically but not practically significantly associated with MPRm categories. AEDs with an unacceptably high MPRm contributed to 3.74% (US$736,376.23) of the total direct cost of all AEDs included in the study, whereas those with an unacceptably low MPRm amounted to US$3,227,894.85 (16.38%). CONCLUSION: Nonadherence to antiepileptic treatment is a major problem, encompassing ~20% of cost in our study. Adherence, however, is likely to improve with the treatment period. Further research is needed to determine the factors influencing epileptic patients’ prescription refill adherence. Dove Medical Press 2016-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4835143/ /pubmed/27110104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S98940 Text en © 2016 Jacobs et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jacobs, Karen
Julyan, Marlene
Lubbe, Martie S
Burger, Johanita R
Cockeran, Marike
Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications
title Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications
title_full Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications
title_fullStr Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications
title_full_unstemmed Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications
title_short Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications
title_sort medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110104
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S98940
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobskaren medicinepossessionratioasproxyforadherencetoantiepilepticdrugsprevalenceassociationsandcostimplications
AT julyanmarlene medicinepossessionratioasproxyforadherencetoantiepilepticdrugsprevalenceassociationsandcostimplications
AT lubbemarties medicinepossessionratioasproxyforadherencetoantiepilepticdrugsprevalenceassociationsandcostimplications
AT burgerjohanitar medicinepossessionratioasproxyforadherencetoantiepilepticdrugsprevalenceassociationsandcostimplications
AT cockeranmarike medicinepossessionratioasproxyforadherencetoantiepilepticdrugsprevalenceassociationsandcostimplications