Cargando…

Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review

Introduction Posterior tympanotomy approach for cochlear implant (CI) surgery, has been the most commonly used worldwide with current 0.7% rate of facial nerve injury. Non-mastoidectomy CI approaches include the suprameatal approach (SMA) and its modifications, the transcanal approach and its modifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Anwar, Mohammad Waheed, ElAassar, Ahmed Shaker, Foad, Yaser Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Publicações Ltda 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27096025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1558871
_version_ 1782427587948052480
author El-Anwar, Mohammad Waheed
ElAassar, Ahmed Shaker
Foad, Yaser Ahmad
author_facet El-Anwar, Mohammad Waheed
ElAassar, Ahmed Shaker
Foad, Yaser Ahmad
author_sort El-Anwar, Mohammad Waheed
collection PubMed
description Introduction Posterior tympanotomy approach for cochlear implant (CI) surgery, has been the most commonly used worldwide with current 0.7% rate of facial nerve injury. Non-mastoidectomy CI approaches include the suprameatal approach (SMA) and its modifications, the transcanal approach and its modifications and the pericanal approach for electrode insertion. Objectives The objective of this study was to review the literature regarding non-mastoidectomy CI approaches. Data Synthesis A search was performed in the LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, PubMed databases and Cochrane Library in February 2015, and the key words used in the search were CI, SMA, transcanal approach, pericanal approach, or electrode extrusion. About 30 studies that met the criteria described in “Study Selection” were read in full. The studies showed 1014 patients that underwent CI by SMA or its modifications, 266 CI patients treated by transcanal approach or its modifications, and 15 patients implanted by the pericanal approach. Reported complication with SMA was 99 (9.8%) minor and 13 (1.3%) major. With transcanal, there were 24 complications; 19 (7.1%) minor and 5 (1.9%) major. No post-operative complication was reported in pericanal approach. Studies showed no reported facial nerve paresis or paralysis in all non-mastoidectomy approaches. Conclusion Complications rates with non-mastoidectomy approaches are similar to those found in the mastoidectomy approach. Thus, non-mastoidectomy approaches may be an alternative in cases where the conventional mastoidectomy approach is difficult to perform. It would be helpful for CI surgeons to become familiarized with these approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4835324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Thieme Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48353242016-04-19 Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review El-Anwar, Mohammad Waheed ElAassar, Ahmed Shaker Foad, Yaser Ahmad Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Article Introduction Posterior tympanotomy approach for cochlear implant (CI) surgery, has been the most commonly used worldwide with current 0.7% rate of facial nerve injury. Non-mastoidectomy CI approaches include the suprameatal approach (SMA) and its modifications, the transcanal approach and its modifications and the pericanal approach for electrode insertion. Objectives The objective of this study was to review the literature regarding non-mastoidectomy CI approaches. Data Synthesis A search was performed in the LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, PubMed databases and Cochrane Library in February 2015, and the key words used in the search were CI, SMA, transcanal approach, pericanal approach, or electrode extrusion. About 30 studies that met the criteria described in “Study Selection” were read in full. The studies showed 1014 patients that underwent CI by SMA or its modifications, 266 CI patients treated by transcanal approach or its modifications, and 15 patients implanted by the pericanal approach. Reported complication with SMA was 99 (9.8%) minor and 13 (1.3%) major. With transcanal, there were 24 complications; 19 (7.1%) minor and 5 (1.9%) major. No post-operative complication was reported in pericanal approach. Studies showed no reported facial nerve paresis or paralysis in all non-mastoidectomy approaches. Conclusion Complications rates with non-mastoidectomy approaches are similar to those found in the mastoidectomy approach. Thus, non-mastoidectomy approaches may be an alternative in cases where the conventional mastoidectomy approach is difficult to perform. It would be helpful for CI surgeons to become familiarized with these approaches. Thieme Publicações Ltda 2015-07-23 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4835324/ /pubmed/27096025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1558871 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
El-Anwar, Mohammad Waheed
ElAassar, Ahmed Shaker
Foad, Yaser Ahmad
Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_full Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_short Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_sort non-mastoidectomy cochlear implant approaches: a literature review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27096025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1558871
work_keys_str_mv AT elanwarmohammadwaheed nonmastoidectomycochlearimplantapproachesaliteraturereview
AT elaassarahmedshaker nonmastoidectomycochlearimplantapproachesaliteraturereview
AT foadyaserahmad nonmastoidectomycochlearimplantapproachesaliteraturereview