Cargando…

Working Memory Network Changes in ALS: An fMRI Study

We used amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) as a model of prefrontal dysfunction in order to re-assess the potential neuronal substrates of two sub processes of working memory, namely information storage and filtering. To date it is unclear which exact neuronal networks sustain these two processes a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vellage, Anne-Katrin, Veit, Maria, Kobeleva, Xenia, Petri, Susanne, Vielhaber, Stefan, Müller, Notger G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00158
_version_ 1782427609404014592
author Vellage, Anne-Katrin
Veit, Maria
Kobeleva, Xenia
Petri, Susanne
Vielhaber, Stefan
Müller, Notger G.
author_facet Vellage, Anne-Katrin
Veit, Maria
Kobeleva, Xenia
Petri, Susanne
Vielhaber, Stefan
Müller, Notger G.
author_sort Vellage, Anne-Katrin
collection PubMed
description We used amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) as a model of prefrontal dysfunction in order to re-assess the potential neuronal substrates of two sub processes of working memory, namely information storage and filtering. To date it is unclear which exact neuronal networks sustain these two processes and the prefrontal cortex was suggested to play a crucial role both for filtering out of irrelevant information and for the storage of relevant information in memory. Other research has attributed information storage to more posterior brain regions, including the parietal cortex and stressed the role of subcortical areas in information filtering. We studied 14 patients suffering from ALS and the same number of healthy controls in an fMRI-task that allowed calculating separate storage and filtering scores. A brain volume analysis confirmed prefrontal atrophy in the patient group. Regarding their performance in the working memory task, we observed a trend toward slightly impaired storage capabilities whereas filtering appeared completely intact. Despite the rather subtle behavioral deficits we observed marked changes in neuronal activity associated with ALS: Compared to healthy controls patients showed significantly reduced hemodynamic responses in the left occipital cortex and right prefrontal cortex in the storage contrast. The filter contrast on the other hand revealed a relative hyperactivation in the superior frontal gyrus of the ALS patients. This hyperactivation might reflect a possible compensational mechanism for the prefrontal degeneration found in ALS. The reduced hemodynamic responses in the storage contrast might reflect a disruption of prefrontal top-down control of posterior brain regions, a process which was especially relevant in the most difficult high load memory task. Taken together, the present study demonstrates marked neurophysiological changes in ALS patients compared to healthy controls during the filtering and storage of information in spite of largely intact behavior. With respect to the neuronal substrates of the two working memory processes under investigation here, the results suggest that it is rather the degree to which top-down control is required for task completion that determines prefrontal cortex involvement than the specific nature of the process, i.e., storage vs. filtering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4835479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48354792016-05-04 Working Memory Network Changes in ALS: An fMRI Study Vellage, Anne-Katrin Veit, Maria Kobeleva, Xenia Petri, Susanne Vielhaber, Stefan Müller, Notger G. Front Neurosci Psychiatry We used amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) as a model of prefrontal dysfunction in order to re-assess the potential neuronal substrates of two sub processes of working memory, namely information storage and filtering. To date it is unclear which exact neuronal networks sustain these two processes and the prefrontal cortex was suggested to play a crucial role both for filtering out of irrelevant information and for the storage of relevant information in memory. Other research has attributed information storage to more posterior brain regions, including the parietal cortex and stressed the role of subcortical areas in information filtering. We studied 14 patients suffering from ALS and the same number of healthy controls in an fMRI-task that allowed calculating separate storage and filtering scores. A brain volume analysis confirmed prefrontal atrophy in the patient group. Regarding their performance in the working memory task, we observed a trend toward slightly impaired storage capabilities whereas filtering appeared completely intact. Despite the rather subtle behavioral deficits we observed marked changes in neuronal activity associated with ALS: Compared to healthy controls patients showed significantly reduced hemodynamic responses in the left occipital cortex and right prefrontal cortex in the storage contrast. The filter contrast on the other hand revealed a relative hyperactivation in the superior frontal gyrus of the ALS patients. This hyperactivation might reflect a possible compensational mechanism for the prefrontal degeneration found in ALS. The reduced hemodynamic responses in the storage contrast might reflect a disruption of prefrontal top-down control of posterior brain regions, a process which was especially relevant in the most difficult high load memory task. Taken together, the present study demonstrates marked neurophysiological changes in ALS patients compared to healthy controls during the filtering and storage of information in spite of largely intact behavior. With respect to the neuronal substrates of the two working memory processes under investigation here, the results suggest that it is rather the degree to which top-down control is required for task completion that determines prefrontal cortex involvement than the specific nature of the process, i.e., storage vs. filtering. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4835479/ /pubmed/27147950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00158 Text en Copyright © 2016 Vellage, Veit, Kobeleva, Petri, Vielhaber and Müller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Vellage, Anne-Katrin
Veit, Maria
Kobeleva, Xenia
Petri, Susanne
Vielhaber, Stefan
Müller, Notger G.
Working Memory Network Changes in ALS: An fMRI Study
title Working Memory Network Changes in ALS: An fMRI Study
title_full Working Memory Network Changes in ALS: An fMRI Study
title_fullStr Working Memory Network Changes in ALS: An fMRI Study
title_full_unstemmed Working Memory Network Changes in ALS: An fMRI Study
title_short Working Memory Network Changes in ALS: An fMRI Study
title_sort working memory network changes in als: an fmri study
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00158
work_keys_str_mv AT vellageannekatrin workingmemorynetworkchangesinalsanfmristudy
AT veitmaria workingmemorynetworkchangesinalsanfmristudy
AT kobelevaxenia workingmemorynetworkchangesinalsanfmristudy
AT petrisusanne workingmemorynetworkchangesinalsanfmristudy
AT vielhaberstefan workingmemorynetworkchangesinalsanfmristudy
AT mullernotgerg workingmemorynetworkchangesinalsanfmristudy