Cargando…
Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions
BACKGROUND: Colon cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. The early detection of colorectal cancer using screening programs is important for managing early-stage colorectal cancers and polyps. Modalities that allow examination of the entire colon are conventional...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kowsar
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110333 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.19518 |
_version_ | 1782427686435553280 |
---|---|
author | Devir, Cigdem Kebapci, Mahmut Temel, Tuncer Ozakyol, Aysegul |
author_facet | Devir, Cigdem Kebapci, Mahmut Temel, Tuncer Ozakyol, Aysegul |
author_sort | Devir, Cigdem |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colon cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. The early detection of colorectal cancer using screening programs is important for managing early-stage colorectal cancers and polyps. Modalities that allow examination of the entire colon are conventional colonoscopy, double contrast barium enema examination and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) colonography. OBJECTIVES: To compare CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy results and to evaluate the accuracy of CT colonography for detecting colorectal lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study performed at Gastroenterology and Radiology Departments of Medical Faculty of Eskisehir Osmangazi University, CT colonography and colonoscopy results of 31 patients with family history of colorectal carcinoma, personal or family history of colorectal polyps, lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, change in bowel habits, iron deficiency anemia and abdominal pain were compared. Regardless of the size, CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy findings for all the lesions were cross - tabulated and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. To assess the agreement between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy examinations, the Kappa coefficient of agreementt was used. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS ver 15.0. RESULTS: Regardless of the size, MDCT colonography showed 83% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 83% for the detection of colorectal polyps and masses. MDCT colonography displayed 92% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 92% and a negative predictive value of 95% for polyps ≥ 10 mm. For polyps between 6mm and 9 mm, MDCT colonography displayed 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 90%. For polyps ≤ 5 mm MDCT colonography displayed 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 95%. CONCLUSIONS: CT colonography is a safe and minimally invasive technique, a valuable diagnostic tool for examining the entire colon and a good alternative compared to other colorectal cancer screening tests because of its high sensitivity values in colorectal lesions over 1 cm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4835868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Kowsar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48358682016-04-22 Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions Devir, Cigdem Kebapci, Mahmut Temel, Tuncer Ozakyol, Aysegul Iran J Radiol Abdominal Imaging BACKGROUND: Colon cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. The early detection of colorectal cancer using screening programs is important for managing early-stage colorectal cancers and polyps. Modalities that allow examination of the entire colon are conventional colonoscopy, double contrast barium enema examination and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) colonography. OBJECTIVES: To compare CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy results and to evaluate the accuracy of CT colonography for detecting colorectal lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study performed at Gastroenterology and Radiology Departments of Medical Faculty of Eskisehir Osmangazi University, CT colonography and colonoscopy results of 31 patients with family history of colorectal carcinoma, personal or family history of colorectal polyps, lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, change in bowel habits, iron deficiency anemia and abdominal pain were compared. Regardless of the size, CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy findings for all the lesions were cross - tabulated and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. To assess the agreement between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy examinations, the Kappa coefficient of agreementt was used. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS ver 15.0. RESULTS: Regardless of the size, MDCT colonography showed 83% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 83% for the detection of colorectal polyps and masses. MDCT colonography displayed 92% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 92% and a negative predictive value of 95% for polyps ≥ 10 mm. For polyps between 6mm and 9 mm, MDCT colonography displayed 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 90%. For polyps ≤ 5 mm MDCT colonography displayed 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 95%. CONCLUSIONS: CT colonography is a safe and minimally invasive technique, a valuable diagnostic tool for examining the entire colon and a good alternative compared to other colorectal cancer screening tests because of its high sensitivity values in colorectal lesions over 1 cm. Kowsar 2016-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4835868/ /pubmed/27110333 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.19518 Text en Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abdominal Imaging Devir, Cigdem Kebapci, Mahmut Temel, Tuncer Ozakyol, Aysegul Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions |
title | Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions |
title_full | Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions |
title_short | Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions |
title_sort | comparison of 64-detector ct colonography and conventional colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal lesions |
topic | Abdominal Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4835868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110333 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.19518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devircigdem comparisonof64detectorctcolonographyandconventionalcolonoscopyinthedetectionofcolorectallesions AT kebapcimahmut comparisonof64detectorctcolonographyandconventionalcolonoscopyinthedetectionofcolorectallesions AT temeltuncer comparisonof64detectorctcolonographyandconventionalcolonoscopyinthedetectionofcolorectallesions AT ozakyolaysegul comparisonof64detectorctcolonographyandconventionalcolonoscopyinthedetectionofcolorectallesions |