Cargando…
US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk
BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on primary care physicians’ (PCPs) use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test by patient risk category. We describe PCP responses to hypothetical patient scenario (PS) involving PSA testing among high-risk asymptomatic men. METHODS: Data were from the 2007...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392814562909 |
_version_ | 1782427707198406656 |
---|---|
author | Rim, Sun Hee Hall, Ingrid J. Richards, Thomas B. Thompson, Trevor D. Richardson, Lisa C. Ross, Louie E. Plescia, Marcus |
author_facet | Rim, Sun Hee Hall, Ingrid J. Richards, Thomas B. Thompson, Trevor D. Richardson, Lisa C. Ross, Louie E. Plescia, Marcus |
author_sort | Rim, Sun Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on primary care physicians’ (PCPs) use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test by patient risk category. We describe PCP responses to hypothetical patient scenario (PS) involving PSA testing among high-risk asymptomatic men. METHODS: Data were from the 2007 to 2008 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Practices Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening. PS#1: healthy 55-year-old white male with no family history of prostate cancer; PS#2: healthy 45-year-old African American male with no family history of prostate cancer; and PS#3: healthy 50-year-old male with a family history of prostate cancer. Data were analyzed in SAS/SUDAAN. RESULTS: Most PCPs indicated that they generally discuss the possible benefits/risks of PSA testing with the patient and then recommend the test (PS#1-PS#3 range, 53.4%-68.7%; P < .001); only about 1% reported discussing and then recommending against the test. For PS#3, compared to PS#1 and #2, PCPs were more likely to discuss and recommend the test or attempt to persuade the patient who initially declines the test. For PS#3, all clinicians generally would order/discuss the PSA test and not rely on the patient to ask. CONCLUSION: Clinicians treat family history as an important reason to recommend, persuade, and initiate PSA testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4836062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48360622016-04-19 US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk Rim, Sun Hee Hall, Ingrid J. Richards, Thomas B. Thompson, Trevor D. Richardson, Lisa C. Ross, Louie E. Plescia, Marcus Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Article BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on primary care physicians’ (PCPs) use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test by patient risk category. We describe PCP responses to hypothetical patient scenario (PS) involving PSA testing among high-risk asymptomatic men. METHODS: Data were from the 2007 to 2008 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Practices Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening. PS#1: healthy 55-year-old white male with no family history of prostate cancer; PS#2: healthy 45-year-old African American male with no family history of prostate cancer; and PS#3: healthy 50-year-old male with a family history of prostate cancer. Data were analyzed in SAS/SUDAAN. RESULTS: Most PCPs indicated that they generally discuss the possible benefits/risks of PSA testing with the patient and then recommend the test (PS#1-PS#3 range, 53.4%-68.7%; P < .001); only about 1% reported discussing and then recommending against the test. For PS#3, compared to PS#1 and #2, PCPs were more likely to discuss and recommend the test or attempt to persuade the patient who initially declines the test. For PS#3, all clinicians generally would order/discuss the PSA test and not rely on the patient to ask. CONCLUSION: Clinicians treat family history as an important reason to recommend, persuade, and initiate PSA testing. SAGE Publications 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4836062/ /pubmed/27104210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392814562909 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). |
spellingShingle | Article Rim, Sun Hee Hall, Ingrid J. Richards, Thomas B. Thompson, Trevor D. Richardson, Lisa C. Ross, Louie E. Plescia, Marcus US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk |
title | US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk |
title_full | US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk |
title_fullStr | US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk |
title_full_unstemmed | US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk |
title_short | US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk |
title_sort | us primary care physicians’ prostate cancer screening practices: a vignette-based analysis of screening men at high risk |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392814562909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rimsunhee usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk AT hallingridj usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk AT richardsthomasb usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk AT thompsontrevord usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk AT richardsonlisac usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk AT rosslouiee usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk AT plesciamarcus usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk |