Cargando…

US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk

BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on primary care physicians’ (PCPs) use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test by patient risk category. We describe PCP responses to hypothetical patient scenario (PS) involving PSA testing among high-risk asymptomatic men. METHODS: Data were from the 2007...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rim, Sun Hee, Hall, Ingrid J., Richards, Thomas B., Thompson, Trevor D., Richardson, Lisa C., Ross, Louie E., Plescia, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392814562909
_version_ 1782427707198406656
author Rim, Sun Hee
Hall, Ingrid J.
Richards, Thomas B.
Thompson, Trevor D.
Richardson, Lisa C.
Ross, Louie E.
Plescia, Marcus
author_facet Rim, Sun Hee
Hall, Ingrid J.
Richards, Thomas B.
Thompson, Trevor D.
Richardson, Lisa C.
Ross, Louie E.
Plescia, Marcus
author_sort Rim, Sun Hee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on primary care physicians’ (PCPs) use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test by patient risk category. We describe PCP responses to hypothetical patient scenario (PS) involving PSA testing among high-risk asymptomatic men. METHODS: Data were from the 2007 to 2008 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Practices Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening. PS#1: healthy 55-year-old white male with no family history of prostate cancer; PS#2: healthy 45-year-old African American male with no family history of prostate cancer; and PS#3: healthy 50-year-old male with a family history of prostate cancer. Data were analyzed in SAS/SUDAAN. RESULTS: Most PCPs indicated that they generally discuss the possible benefits/risks of PSA testing with the patient and then recommend the test (PS#1-PS#3 range, 53.4%-68.7%; P < .001); only about 1% reported discussing and then recommending against the test. For PS#3, compared to PS#1 and #2, PCPs were more likely to discuss and recommend the test or attempt to persuade the patient who initially declines the test. For PS#3, all clinicians generally would order/discuss the PSA test and not rely on the patient to ask. CONCLUSION: Clinicians treat family history as an important reason to recommend, persuade, and initiate PSA testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4836062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48360622016-04-19 US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk Rim, Sun Hee Hall, Ingrid J. Richards, Thomas B. Thompson, Trevor D. Richardson, Lisa C. Ross, Louie E. Plescia, Marcus Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Article BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on primary care physicians’ (PCPs) use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test by patient risk category. We describe PCP responses to hypothetical patient scenario (PS) involving PSA testing among high-risk asymptomatic men. METHODS: Data were from the 2007 to 2008 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Practices Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening. PS#1: healthy 55-year-old white male with no family history of prostate cancer; PS#2: healthy 45-year-old African American male with no family history of prostate cancer; and PS#3: healthy 50-year-old male with a family history of prostate cancer. Data were analyzed in SAS/SUDAAN. RESULTS: Most PCPs indicated that they generally discuss the possible benefits/risks of PSA testing with the patient and then recommend the test (PS#1-PS#3 range, 53.4%-68.7%; P < .001); only about 1% reported discussing and then recommending against the test. For PS#3, compared to PS#1 and #2, PCPs were more likely to discuss and recommend the test or attempt to persuade the patient who initially declines the test. For PS#3, all clinicians generally would order/discuss the PSA test and not rely on the patient to ask. CONCLUSION: Clinicians treat family history as an important reason to recommend, persuade, and initiate PSA testing. SAGE Publications 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4836062/ /pubmed/27104210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392814562909 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Article
Rim, Sun Hee
Hall, Ingrid J.
Richards, Thomas B.
Thompson, Trevor D.
Richardson, Lisa C.
Ross, Louie E.
Plescia, Marcus
US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk
title US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk
title_full US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk
title_fullStr US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk
title_full_unstemmed US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk
title_short US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk
title_sort us primary care physicians’ prostate cancer screening practices: a vignette-based analysis of screening men at high risk
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392814562909
work_keys_str_mv AT rimsunhee usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk
AT hallingridj usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk
AT richardsthomasb usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk
AT thompsontrevord usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk
AT richardsonlisac usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk
AT rosslouiee usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk
AT plesciamarcus usprimarycarephysiciansprostatecancerscreeningpracticesavignettebasedanalysisofscreeningmenathighrisk