Cargando…

Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period

BACKGROUND: Most stroke recovery occurs by 90 days after onset, with proportional recovery models showing an achievement of about 70% of the maximal remaining recovery. Little is known about recovery during the acute stroke period. Moreover, data are described for groups, not for individuals. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunn, Lauren E., Schweber, Adam B., Manson, Daniel K., Lendaris, Andrea, Herber, Charlotte, Marshall, Randolph S., Lazar, Ronald M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000444149
_version_ 1782427718205308928
author Dunn, Lauren E.
Schweber, Adam B.
Manson, Daniel K.
Lendaris, Andrea
Herber, Charlotte
Marshall, Randolph S.
Lazar, Ronald M.
author_facet Dunn, Lauren E.
Schweber, Adam B.
Manson, Daniel K.
Lendaris, Andrea
Herber, Charlotte
Marshall, Randolph S.
Lazar, Ronald M.
author_sort Dunn, Lauren E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most stroke recovery occurs by 90 days after onset, with proportional recovery models showing an achievement of about 70% of the maximal remaining recovery. Little is known about recovery during the acute stroke period. Moreover, data are described for groups, not for individuals. In this observational cohort study, we describe for the first time the daily changes of acute stroke patients with motor and/or language deficits over the first week after stroke onset. METHODS: Patients were enrolled within 24-72 h after stroke onset with upper extremity hemiparesis, aphasia, or both, and were tested daily until day 7 or discharge with the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke, the Boston Naming Test, and the comprehension domain from the Western Aphasia Battery. Discharge scores, and absolute and proportional changes were examined using t-tests for pairwise comparisons and linear regression to determine relative contributions of initial impairment, lesion volume, and age to recovery over this period. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled: 19 had motor deficits alone, 8 had aphasia alone, and 7 had motor and language deficits. In a group analysis, statistically significant changes in absolute scores were found in the motor (p < 0.001) and comprehension (p < 0.001) domains but not in naming. Day-by-day recovery curves for individual patients displayed wide variation with comparable initial impairment. Proportional recovery calculations revealed that, on average, patients achieved less than 1/3 of their potential recovery by the time of discharge. Multivariate regression showed that the amount of variance accounted for by initial severity, age, and lesion volume in this early time period was not significant for motor or language domains. CONCLUSIONS: Over the first week after stroke onset, recovery of upper extremity hemiparesis and aphasia were not predictable on the basis of initial impairment, lesion volume, or age. In addition, patients only achieved about 1/3 of their remaining possible recovery based on the anticipated 70% proportion found at 90 days. These findings suggest that the complex interaction between poststroke structural repair, regeneration, and functional reorganization during the first week after stroke has yet to be elucidated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4836126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48361262016-04-20 Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period Dunn, Lauren E. Schweber, Adam B. Manson, Daniel K. Lendaris, Andrea Herber, Charlotte Marshall, Randolph S. Lazar, Ronald M. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra Original Paper BACKGROUND: Most stroke recovery occurs by 90 days after onset, with proportional recovery models showing an achievement of about 70% of the maximal remaining recovery. Little is known about recovery during the acute stroke period. Moreover, data are described for groups, not for individuals. In this observational cohort study, we describe for the first time the daily changes of acute stroke patients with motor and/or language deficits over the first week after stroke onset. METHODS: Patients were enrolled within 24-72 h after stroke onset with upper extremity hemiparesis, aphasia, or both, and were tested daily until day 7 or discharge with the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke, the Boston Naming Test, and the comprehension domain from the Western Aphasia Battery. Discharge scores, and absolute and proportional changes were examined using t-tests for pairwise comparisons and linear regression to determine relative contributions of initial impairment, lesion volume, and age to recovery over this period. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled: 19 had motor deficits alone, 8 had aphasia alone, and 7 had motor and language deficits. In a group analysis, statistically significant changes in absolute scores were found in the motor (p < 0.001) and comprehension (p < 0.001) domains but not in naming. Day-by-day recovery curves for individual patients displayed wide variation with comparable initial impairment. Proportional recovery calculations revealed that, on average, patients achieved less than 1/3 of their potential recovery by the time of discharge. Multivariate regression showed that the amount of variance accounted for by initial severity, age, and lesion volume in this early time period was not significant for motor or language domains. CONCLUSIONS: Over the first week after stroke onset, recovery of upper extremity hemiparesis and aphasia were not predictable on the basis of initial impairment, lesion volume, or age. In addition, patients only achieved about 1/3 of their remaining possible recovery based on the anticipated 70% proportion found at 90 days. These findings suggest that the complex interaction between poststroke structural repair, regeneration, and functional reorganization during the first week after stroke has yet to be elucidated. S. Karger AG 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4836126/ /pubmed/27099611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000444149 Text en Copyright © 2016 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Dunn, Lauren E.
Schweber, Adam B.
Manson, Daniel K.
Lendaris, Andrea
Herber, Charlotte
Marshall, Randolph S.
Lazar, Ronald M.
Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period
title Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period
title_full Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period
title_fullStr Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period
title_full_unstemmed Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period
title_short Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period
title_sort variability in motor and language recovery during the acute stroke period
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000444149
work_keys_str_mv AT dunnlaurene variabilityinmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringtheacutestrokeperiod
AT schweberadamb variabilityinmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringtheacutestrokeperiod
AT mansondanielk variabilityinmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringtheacutestrokeperiod
AT lendarisandrea variabilityinmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringtheacutestrokeperiod
AT herbercharlotte variabilityinmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringtheacutestrokeperiod
AT marshallrandolphs variabilityinmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringtheacutestrokeperiod
AT lazarronaldm variabilityinmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringtheacutestrokeperiod