Cargando…

The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis

Exercise training at a variety of intensities increases maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), the strongest predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review, meta-regression and meta-analysis of available literature to determine if...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D., VECSEY, STEPHAN, HANKINSON, PAUL B., FOSTER, WILLIAM S., GURD, BRENDON J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182424
_version_ 1782427750890471424
author SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D.
VECSEY, STEPHAN
HANKINSON, PAUL B.
FOSTER, WILLIAM S.
GURD, BRENDON J.
author_facet SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D.
VECSEY, STEPHAN
HANKINSON, PAUL B.
FOSTER, WILLIAM S.
GURD, BRENDON J.
author_sort SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D.
collection PubMed
description Exercise training at a variety of intensities increases maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), the strongest predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review, meta-regression and meta-analysis of available literature to determine if a dose-response relationship exists between exercise intensity and training-induced increases in VO(2)max in young healthy adults. Twenty-eight studies involving human participants (Mean age: 23±1 yr; Mean VO(2)max: 3.4±0.8 l·min(−1)) were included in the meta-regression with exercise training intensity, session dose, baseline VO(2)max, and total training volume used as covariates. These studies were also divided into 3 tertiles based on intensity (tertile 1: ~60–70%; 2: ~80–92.5%; 3: ~100–250%VO(2)max), for comparison using separate meta-analyses. The fixed and random effects meta-regression models examining training intensity, session dose, baseline VO(2)max and total training volume was non-significant (Q4=1.36; p=0.85; R(2)=0.05). There was no significant difference between tertiles in mean change in VO(2)max (tertile 1:+0.29±0.15 l/min, ES (effect size) =0.77; 2:+0.26±0.10 l/min, ES=0.68; 3:+0.35±0.17 l/min, ES=0.80), despite significant (p<0.05) reductions in session dose and total training volume as training intensity increased. These data suggest that exercise training intensity has no effect on the magnitude of training-induced increases in maximal oxygen uptake in young healthy human participants, but similar adaptations can be achieved in low training doses at higher exercise intensities than higher training doses of lower intensity (endurance training).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4836566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48365662016-05-12 The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D. VECSEY, STEPHAN HANKINSON, PAUL B. FOSTER, WILLIAM S. GURD, BRENDON J. Int J Exerc Sci Review Article Exercise training at a variety of intensities increases maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), the strongest predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review, meta-regression and meta-analysis of available literature to determine if a dose-response relationship exists between exercise intensity and training-induced increases in VO(2)max in young healthy adults. Twenty-eight studies involving human participants (Mean age: 23±1 yr; Mean VO(2)max: 3.4±0.8 l·min(−1)) were included in the meta-regression with exercise training intensity, session dose, baseline VO(2)max, and total training volume used as covariates. These studies were also divided into 3 tertiles based on intensity (tertile 1: ~60–70%; 2: ~80–92.5%; 3: ~100–250%VO(2)max), for comparison using separate meta-analyses. The fixed and random effects meta-regression models examining training intensity, session dose, baseline VO(2)max and total training volume was non-significant (Q4=1.36; p=0.85; R(2)=0.05). There was no significant difference between tertiles in mean change in VO(2)max (tertile 1:+0.29±0.15 l/min, ES (effect size) =0.77; 2:+0.26±0.10 l/min, ES=0.68; 3:+0.35±0.17 l/min, ES=0.80), despite significant (p<0.05) reductions in session dose and total training volume as training intensity increased. These data suggest that exercise training intensity has no effect on the magnitude of training-induced increases in maximal oxygen uptake in young healthy human participants, but similar adaptations can be achieved in low training doses at higher exercise intensities than higher training doses of lower intensity (endurance training). Berkeley Electronic Press 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4836566/ /pubmed/27182424 Text en
spellingShingle Review Article
SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D.
VECSEY, STEPHAN
HANKINSON, PAUL B.
FOSTER, WILLIAM S.
GURD, BRENDON J.
The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis
title The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effect of training intensity on vo(2)max in young healthy adults: a meta-regression and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182424
work_keys_str_mv AT scribbanstrishad theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT vecseystephan theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT hankinsonpaulb theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT fosterwilliams theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT gurdbrendonj theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT scribbanstrishad effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT vecseystephan effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT hankinsonpaulb effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT fosterwilliams effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis
AT gurdbrendonj effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis