Cargando…
The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis
Exercise training at a variety of intensities increases maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), the strongest predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review, meta-regression and meta-analysis of available literature to determine if...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Berkeley Electronic Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182424 |
_version_ | 1782427750890471424 |
---|---|
author | SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D. VECSEY, STEPHAN HANKINSON, PAUL B. FOSTER, WILLIAM S. GURD, BRENDON J. |
author_facet | SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D. VECSEY, STEPHAN HANKINSON, PAUL B. FOSTER, WILLIAM S. GURD, BRENDON J. |
author_sort | SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Exercise training at a variety of intensities increases maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), the strongest predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review, meta-regression and meta-analysis of available literature to determine if a dose-response relationship exists between exercise intensity and training-induced increases in VO(2)max in young healthy adults. Twenty-eight studies involving human participants (Mean age: 23±1 yr; Mean VO(2)max: 3.4±0.8 l·min(−1)) were included in the meta-regression with exercise training intensity, session dose, baseline VO(2)max, and total training volume used as covariates. These studies were also divided into 3 tertiles based on intensity (tertile 1: ~60–70%; 2: ~80–92.5%; 3: ~100–250%VO(2)max), for comparison using separate meta-analyses. The fixed and random effects meta-regression models examining training intensity, session dose, baseline VO(2)max and total training volume was non-significant (Q4=1.36; p=0.85; R(2)=0.05). There was no significant difference between tertiles in mean change in VO(2)max (tertile 1:+0.29±0.15 l/min, ES (effect size) =0.77; 2:+0.26±0.10 l/min, ES=0.68; 3:+0.35±0.17 l/min, ES=0.80), despite significant (p<0.05) reductions in session dose and total training volume as training intensity increased. These data suggest that exercise training intensity has no effect on the magnitude of training-induced increases in maximal oxygen uptake in young healthy human participants, but similar adaptations can be achieved in low training doses at higher exercise intensities than higher training doses of lower intensity (endurance training). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4836566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Berkeley Electronic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48365662016-05-12 The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D. VECSEY, STEPHAN HANKINSON, PAUL B. FOSTER, WILLIAM S. GURD, BRENDON J. Int J Exerc Sci Review Article Exercise training at a variety of intensities increases maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), the strongest predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review, meta-regression and meta-analysis of available literature to determine if a dose-response relationship exists between exercise intensity and training-induced increases in VO(2)max in young healthy adults. Twenty-eight studies involving human participants (Mean age: 23±1 yr; Mean VO(2)max: 3.4±0.8 l·min(−1)) were included in the meta-regression with exercise training intensity, session dose, baseline VO(2)max, and total training volume used as covariates. These studies were also divided into 3 tertiles based on intensity (tertile 1: ~60–70%; 2: ~80–92.5%; 3: ~100–250%VO(2)max), for comparison using separate meta-analyses. The fixed and random effects meta-regression models examining training intensity, session dose, baseline VO(2)max and total training volume was non-significant (Q4=1.36; p=0.85; R(2)=0.05). There was no significant difference between tertiles in mean change in VO(2)max (tertile 1:+0.29±0.15 l/min, ES (effect size) =0.77; 2:+0.26±0.10 l/min, ES=0.68; 3:+0.35±0.17 l/min, ES=0.80), despite significant (p<0.05) reductions in session dose and total training volume as training intensity increased. These data suggest that exercise training intensity has no effect on the magnitude of training-induced increases in maximal oxygen uptake in young healthy human participants, but similar adaptations can be achieved in low training doses at higher exercise intensities than higher training doses of lower intensity (endurance training). Berkeley Electronic Press 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4836566/ /pubmed/27182424 Text en |
spellingShingle | Review Article SCRIBBANS, TRISHA D. VECSEY, STEPHAN HANKINSON, PAUL B. FOSTER, WILLIAM S. GURD, BRENDON J. The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Effect of Training Intensity on VO(2)max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effect of training intensity on vo(2)max in young healthy adults: a meta-regression and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scribbanstrishad theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT vecseystephan theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT hankinsonpaulb theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT fosterwilliams theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT gurdbrendonj theeffectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT scribbanstrishad effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT vecseystephan effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT hankinsonpaulb effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT fosterwilliams effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis AT gurdbrendonj effectoftrainingintensityonvo2maxinyounghealthyadultsametaregressionandmetaanalysis |