Cargando…
Morton, Gould, and Bias: A Comment on “The Mismeasure of Science”
A closer look at Stephen Jay Gould’s criticisms of Samuel Morton vindicates Gould’s accusations of racial bias in Morton’s cranial measurements.
Autores principales: | Weisberg, Michael, Paul, Diane B. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002444 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias
por: Lewis, Jason E., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Correction: The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias
por: Lewis, Jason E., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Comment on "Hotair Is Dispensable for Mouse Development"
por: Li, Lingjie, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Formal Comment: Romer study fails at following core principles of reanalysis
por: Bridge, Jeffrey A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Formal comment on “Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease”
por: Diamond, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)