Cargando…
Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward
BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that a lack of senior obstetricians (“consultants”) on the labour ward outside normal hours may lead to worse outcomes among babies born during periods of reduced cover. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We carried out a multicentre cohort study using data from 19 obstetric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27093698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002000 |
_version_ | 1782427771459338240 |
---|---|
author | Knight, Hannah E. van der Meulen, Jan H. Gurol-Urganci, Ipek Smith, Gordon C. Kiran, Amit Thornton, Steve Richmond, David Cameron, Alan Cromwell, David A. |
author_facet | Knight, Hannah E. van der Meulen, Jan H. Gurol-Urganci, Ipek Smith, Gordon C. Kiran, Amit Thornton, Steve Richmond, David Cameron, Alan Cromwell, David A. |
author_sort | Knight, Hannah E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that a lack of senior obstetricians (“consultants”) on the labour ward outside normal hours may lead to worse outcomes among babies born during periods of reduced cover. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We carried out a multicentre cohort study using data from 19 obstetric units in the United Kingdom between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2013 to examine whether rates of obstetric intervention and outcome change “out-of-hours,” i.e., when consultants are not providing dedicated, on-site labour ward cover. At the 19 hospitals, obstetric rotas ranged from 51 to 106 h of on-site labour ward cover per week. There were 87,501 singleton live births during the year, and 55.8% occurred out-of-hours. Women who delivered out-of-hours had slightly lower rates of intrapartum caesarean section (CS) (12.7% versus 13.4%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90 to 0.98) and instrumental delivery (15.6% versus 17.0%, adj. OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) than women who delivered at times of on-site labour ward cover. There was some evidence that the severe perineal tear rate was reduced in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries (3.3% versus 3.6%, adj. OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00). There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference between out-of-hours and “in-hours” deliveries in the rate of babies with a low Apgar score at 5 min (1.33% versus 1.25%, adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.21) or low cord pH (0.94% versus 0.82%; adjusted OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.31). Key study limitations include the potential for bias by indication, the reliance upon an organisational measure of consultant presence, and a non-random sample of maternity units. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the rate of maternal and neonatal morbidity according to the presence of consultants on the labour ward, with the possible exception of a reduced rate of severe perineal tears in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries. Fewer women had operative deliveries out-of-hours. Taken together, the available evidence provides some reassurance that the current organisation of maternity care in the UK allows for good planning and risk management. However there is a need for more robust evidence on the quality of care afforded by different models of labour ward staffing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4836717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48367172016-04-29 Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward Knight, Hannah E. van der Meulen, Jan H. Gurol-Urganci, Ipek Smith, Gordon C. Kiran, Amit Thornton, Steve Richmond, David Cameron, Alan Cromwell, David A. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that a lack of senior obstetricians (“consultants”) on the labour ward outside normal hours may lead to worse outcomes among babies born during periods of reduced cover. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We carried out a multicentre cohort study using data from 19 obstetric units in the United Kingdom between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2013 to examine whether rates of obstetric intervention and outcome change “out-of-hours,” i.e., when consultants are not providing dedicated, on-site labour ward cover. At the 19 hospitals, obstetric rotas ranged from 51 to 106 h of on-site labour ward cover per week. There were 87,501 singleton live births during the year, and 55.8% occurred out-of-hours. Women who delivered out-of-hours had slightly lower rates of intrapartum caesarean section (CS) (12.7% versus 13.4%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90 to 0.98) and instrumental delivery (15.6% versus 17.0%, adj. OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) than women who delivered at times of on-site labour ward cover. There was some evidence that the severe perineal tear rate was reduced in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries (3.3% versus 3.6%, adj. OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00). There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference between out-of-hours and “in-hours” deliveries in the rate of babies with a low Apgar score at 5 min (1.33% versus 1.25%, adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.21) or low cord pH (0.94% versus 0.82%; adjusted OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.31). Key study limitations include the potential for bias by indication, the reliance upon an organisational measure of consultant presence, and a non-random sample of maternity units. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the rate of maternal and neonatal morbidity according to the presence of consultants on the labour ward, with the possible exception of a reduced rate of severe perineal tears in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries. Fewer women had operative deliveries out-of-hours. Taken together, the available evidence provides some reassurance that the current organisation of maternity care in the UK allows for good planning and risk management. However there is a need for more robust evidence on the quality of care afforded by different models of labour ward staffing. Public Library of Science 2016-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4836717/ /pubmed/27093698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002000 Text en © 2016 Knight et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Knight, Hannah E. van der Meulen, Jan H. Gurol-Urganci, Ipek Smith, Gordon C. Kiran, Amit Thornton, Steve Richmond, David Cameron, Alan Cromwell, David A. Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward |
title | Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward |
title_full | Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward |
title_fullStr | Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward |
title_full_unstemmed | Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward |
title_short | Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward |
title_sort | birth “out-of-hours”: an evaluation of obstetric practice and outcome according to the presence of senior obstetricians on the labour ward |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27093698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knighthannahe birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward AT vandermeulenjanh birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward AT gurolurganciipek birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward AT smithgordonc birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward AT kiranamit birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward AT thorntonsteve birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward AT richmonddavid birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward AT cameronalan birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward AT cromwelldavida birthoutofhoursanevaluationofobstetricpracticeandoutcomeaccordingtothepresenceofseniorobstetriciansonthelabourward |