Cargando…

Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study

Study Design Prospective multicenter single-arm interventional clinical trial. Objective To determine the degree of improvement in sacroiliac (SI) joint pain, disability related to SI joint pain, and quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction who undergo minimally invasive SI joint fusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duhon, Bradley S., Cher, Daniel J., Wine, Kathryn D., Kovalsky, Don A., Lockstadt, Harry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1562912
_version_ 1782427788359237632
author Duhon, Bradley S.
Cher, Daniel J.
Wine, Kathryn D.
Kovalsky, Don A.
Lockstadt, Harry
author_facet Duhon, Bradley S.
Cher, Daniel J.
Wine, Kathryn D.
Kovalsky, Don A.
Lockstadt, Harry
author_sort Duhon, Bradley S.
collection PubMed
description Study Design Prospective multicenter single-arm interventional clinical trial. Objective To determine the degree of improvement in sacroiliac (SI) joint pain, disability related to SI joint pain, and quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction who undergo minimally invasive SI joint fusion using triangular-shaped titanium implants. Methods Subjects (n = 172) underwent minimally invasive SI joint fusion between August 2012 and January 2014 and completed structured assessments preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, including a 100-mm SI joint and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and EuroQOL-5D. Patient satisfaction with surgery was assessed at 6 and 12 months. Results Mean SI joint pain improved from 79.8 at baseline to 30.0 and 30.4 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (mean improvements of 49.9 and 49.1 points, p < 0.0001 each). Mean ODI improved from 55.2 at baseline to 32.5 and 31.4 at 6 and 12 months (improvements of 22.7 and 23.9 points, p < 0.0001 each). SF-36 physical component summary improved from 31.7 at baseline to 40.2 and 40.3 at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.0001). At 6 and 12 months, 93 and 87% of subjects, respectively, were somewhat or very satisfied and 92 and 91%, respectively, would have the procedure again. Conclusions Minimally invasive SI joint fusion resulted in improvement of pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis and SI joint disruption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4836932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48369322016-05-01 Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study Duhon, Bradley S. Cher, Daniel J. Wine, Kathryn D. Kovalsky, Don A. Lockstadt, Harry Global Spine J Article Study Design Prospective multicenter single-arm interventional clinical trial. Objective To determine the degree of improvement in sacroiliac (SI) joint pain, disability related to SI joint pain, and quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction who undergo minimally invasive SI joint fusion using triangular-shaped titanium implants. Methods Subjects (n = 172) underwent minimally invasive SI joint fusion between August 2012 and January 2014 and completed structured assessments preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, including a 100-mm SI joint and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and EuroQOL-5D. Patient satisfaction with surgery was assessed at 6 and 12 months. Results Mean SI joint pain improved from 79.8 at baseline to 30.0 and 30.4 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (mean improvements of 49.9 and 49.1 points, p < 0.0001 each). Mean ODI improved from 55.2 at baseline to 32.5 and 31.4 at 6 and 12 months (improvements of 22.7 and 23.9 points, p < 0.0001 each). SF-36 physical component summary improved from 31.7 at baseline to 40.2 and 40.3 at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.0001). At 6 and 12 months, 93 and 87% of subjects, respectively, were somewhat or very satisfied and 92 and 91%, respectively, would have the procedure again. Conclusions Minimally invasive SI joint fusion resulted in improvement of pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis and SI joint disruption. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-08-11 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4836932/ /pubmed/27099817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1562912 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Duhon, Bradley S.
Cher, Daniel J.
Wine, Kathryn D.
Kovalsky, Don A.
Lockstadt, Harry
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study
title Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study
title_full Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study
title_short Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study
title_sort triangular titanium implants for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1562912
work_keys_str_mv AT duhonbradleys triangulartitaniumimplantsforminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT cherdanielj triangulartitaniumimplantsforminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT winekathrynd triangulartitaniumimplantsforminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT kovalskydona triangulartitaniumimplantsforminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT lockstadtharry triangulartitaniumimplantsforminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT triangulartitaniumimplantsforminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy