Cargando…

Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study

BACKGROUND: The sublingual mucosa has been used for many years to apply allergenic extracts for the purpose of specific immunotherapy (IT). Although sublingual IT (SLIT) is both safe and efficacious, the density of antigen-presenting cells is higher in other regions of the oral cavity and vestibule,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reisacher, William R., Suurna, Maria V., Rochlin, Kate, Bremberg, Maria G., Tropper, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103556
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0150
_version_ 1782427798341681152
author Reisacher, William R.
Suurna, Maria V.
Rochlin, Kate
Bremberg, Maria G.
Tropper, Guy
author_facet Reisacher, William R.
Suurna, Maria V.
Rochlin, Kate
Bremberg, Maria G.
Tropper, Guy
author_sort Reisacher, William R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The sublingual mucosa has been used for many years to apply allergenic extracts for the purpose of specific immunotherapy (IT). Although sublingual IT (SLIT) is both safe and efficacious, the density of antigen-presenting cells is higher in other regions of the oral cavity and vestibule, which make them a potentially desirable target for IT. OBJECTIVE: To present the concept of oral mucosal IT (OMIT) and to provide pilot data for this extended application of SLIT. METHODS: An open-label, 12-month, prospective study was undertaken as a preliminary step before a full-scale clinical investigation. Twenty-four individuals with allergic rhinitis received IT by applying allergenic extracts daily to either the oral vestibule plus oral cavity mucosa by using a glycerin-based toothpaste or to the sublingual mucosa by using 50% glycerin liquid drops. Adverse events, adherence rates, total combined scores, rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire scores, changes in skin reactivity, and changes in serum antibody levels were measured for each participant. RESULTS: No severe adverse events occurred in either group. The adherence rate was 80% for the OMIT group and 62% for the SLIT group (p = 0.61). Decreased total combined scores were demonstrated for both the OMIT group (15.6%) and the SLIT group (22.3%), although this decrease did not reach statistical significance in either group. Both groups achieved a meaningful clinical improvement of at least 0.5 points on rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire. A statistically significant rise in specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) was seen in both groups over the first 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: OMIT and SLIT demonstrated similar safety profiles and adherence rates. Measurements of clinical efficacy improved for both groups, but only changes in IgG4 achieved statistical significance. These pilot data provide enough evidence to proceed with a full-scale investigation to explore the role of OMIT in the long-term management of allergic rhinitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4837130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher OceanSide Publications, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48371302016-04-27 Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study Reisacher, William R. Suurna, Maria V. Rochlin, Kate Bremberg, Maria G. Tropper, Guy Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Articles BACKGROUND: The sublingual mucosa has been used for many years to apply allergenic extracts for the purpose of specific immunotherapy (IT). Although sublingual IT (SLIT) is both safe and efficacious, the density of antigen-presenting cells is higher in other regions of the oral cavity and vestibule, which make them a potentially desirable target for IT. OBJECTIVE: To present the concept of oral mucosal IT (OMIT) and to provide pilot data for this extended application of SLIT. METHODS: An open-label, 12-month, prospective study was undertaken as a preliminary step before a full-scale clinical investigation. Twenty-four individuals with allergic rhinitis received IT by applying allergenic extracts daily to either the oral vestibule plus oral cavity mucosa by using a glycerin-based toothpaste or to the sublingual mucosa by using 50% glycerin liquid drops. Adverse events, adherence rates, total combined scores, rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire scores, changes in skin reactivity, and changes in serum antibody levels were measured for each participant. RESULTS: No severe adverse events occurred in either group. The adherence rate was 80% for the OMIT group and 62% for the SLIT group (p = 0.61). Decreased total combined scores were demonstrated for both the OMIT group (15.6%) and the SLIT group (22.3%), although this decrease did not reach statistical significance in either group. Both groups achieved a meaningful clinical improvement of at least 0.5 points on rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire. A statistically significant rise in specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) was seen in both groups over the first 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: OMIT and SLIT demonstrated similar safety profiles and adherence rates. Measurements of clinical efficacy improved for both groups, but only changes in IgG4 achieved statistical significance. These pilot data provide enough evidence to proceed with a full-scale investigation to explore the role of OMIT in the long-term management of allergic rhinitis. OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4837130/ /pubmed/27103556 http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0150 Text en Copyright © 2016, OceanSide Publications, Inc., U.S.A. This publication is provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License ("CCPL" or "License"), in attribution 3.0 unported (Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND)), further described at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. The work is protected by copyright and/or other applicable law. Any use of the work other then as authorized under this license or copyright law is prohibited.
spellingShingle Articles
Reisacher, William R.
Suurna, Maria V.
Rochlin, Kate
Bremberg, Maria G.
Tropper, Guy
Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study
title Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study
title_full Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study
title_fullStr Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study
title_short Oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A pilot study
title_sort oral mucosal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: a pilot study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103556
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2016.7.0150
work_keys_str_mv AT reisacherwilliamr oralmucosalimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisapilotstudy
AT suurnamariav oralmucosalimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisapilotstudy
AT rochlinkate oralmucosalimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisapilotstudy
AT brembergmariag oralmucosalimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisapilotstudy
AT tropperguy oralmucosalimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisapilotstudy