Cargando…

Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Dementia is a major public health problem, and repeated cognitive data from large epidemiological studies could help to develop efficient measures of early prevention. Data collection by self-administered online tools could drastically reduce the logistical and financial burden of such l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assmann, Karen E, Bailet, Marion, Lecoffre, Amandine C, Galan, Pilar, Hercberg, Serge, Amieva, Hélène, Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27049114
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4862
_version_ 1782427828751433728
author Assmann, Karen E
Bailet, Marion
Lecoffre, Amandine C
Galan, Pilar
Hercberg, Serge
Amieva, Hélène
Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
author_facet Assmann, Karen E
Bailet, Marion
Lecoffre, Amandine C
Galan, Pilar
Hercberg, Serge
Amieva, Hélène
Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
author_sort Assmann, Karen E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dementia is a major public health problem, and repeated cognitive data from large epidemiological studies could help to develop efficient measures of early prevention. Data collection by self-administered online tools could drastically reduce the logistical and financial burden of such large-scale investigations. In this context, it is important to obtain data concerning the comparability of such new online tools with traditional, supervised modes of cognitive assessment. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare self-administration of the Web-based NutriNet-Santé cognitive test battery (NutriCog) with administration by a neuropsychologist. METHODS: The test battery included four tests, measuring, among others aspects, psychomotor speed, attention, executive function, episodic memory, working memory, and associative memory. Both versions of the cognitive battery were completed by 189 volunteers (either self-administered version first, n=99, or supervised version first, n=90). Subjects also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Concordance was assessed by Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Agreement between both versions varied according to the investigated cognitive task and outcome variable. Spearman correlations ranged between .42 and .73. Moreover, a majority of participants responded that they “absolutely” or “rather” agreed that the duration of the self-administered battery was acceptable (184/185, 99.5%), that the tasks were amusing (162/185, 87.6%), that the instructions were sufficiently detailed (168/185; 90.8%) and understandable (164/185, 88.7%), and that they had overall enjoyed the test battery (182/185, 98.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The self-administered version of the Web-based NutriCog cognitive test battery provided similar information as the supervised version. Thus, integrating repeated cognitive evaluations into large cohorts via the implementation of self-administered online versions of traditional test batteries appears to be feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4837293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48372932016-05-06 Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study Assmann, Karen E Bailet, Marion Lecoffre, Amandine C Galan, Pilar Hercberg, Serge Amieva, Hélène Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Dementia is a major public health problem, and repeated cognitive data from large epidemiological studies could help to develop efficient measures of early prevention. Data collection by self-administered online tools could drastically reduce the logistical and financial burden of such large-scale investigations. In this context, it is important to obtain data concerning the comparability of such new online tools with traditional, supervised modes of cognitive assessment. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare self-administration of the Web-based NutriNet-Santé cognitive test battery (NutriCog) with administration by a neuropsychologist. METHODS: The test battery included four tests, measuring, among others aspects, psychomotor speed, attention, executive function, episodic memory, working memory, and associative memory. Both versions of the cognitive battery were completed by 189 volunteers (either self-administered version first, n=99, or supervised version first, n=90). Subjects also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Concordance was assessed by Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Agreement between both versions varied according to the investigated cognitive task and outcome variable. Spearman correlations ranged between .42 and .73. Moreover, a majority of participants responded that they “absolutely” or “rather” agreed that the duration of the self-administered battery was acceptable (184/185, 99.5%), that the tasks were amusing (162/185, 87.6%), that the instructions were sufficiently detailed (168/185; 90.8%) and understandable (164/185, 88.7%), and that they had overall enjoyed the test battery (182/185, 98.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The self-administered version of the Web-based NutriCog cognitive test battery provided similar information as the supervised version. Thus, integrating repeated cognitive evaluations into large cohorts via the implementation of self-administered online versions of traditional test batteries appears to be feasible. JMIR Publications Inc. 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4837293/ /pubmed/27049114 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4862 Text en ©Karen E Assmann, Marion Bailet, Amandine C Lecoffre, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Hélène Amieva, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.04.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Assmann, Karen E
Bailet, Marion
Lecoffre, Amandine C
Galan, Pilar
Hercberg, Serge
Amieva, Hélène
Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_full Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_short Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
title_sort comparison between a self-administered and supervised version of a web-based cognitive test battery: results from the nutrinet-santé cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27049114
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4862
work_keys_str_mv AT assmannkarene comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT bailetmarion comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT lecoffreamandinec comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT galanpilar comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT hercbergserge comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT amievahelene comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy
AT kesseguyotemmanuelle comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy