Cargando…
Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Dementia is a major public health problem, and repeated cognitive data from large epidemiological studies could help to develop efficient measures of early prevention. Data collection by self-administered online tools could drastically reduce the logistical and financial burden of such l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27049114 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4862 |
_version_ | 1782427828751433728 |
---|---|
author | Assmann, Karen E Bailet, Marion Lecoffre, Amandine C Galan, Pilar Hercberg, Serge Amieva, Hélène Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle |
author_facet | Assmann, Karen E Bailet, Marion Lecoffre, Amandine C Galan, Pilar Hercberg, Serge Amieva, Hélène Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle |
author_sort | Assmann, Karen E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dementia is a major public health problem, and repeated cognitive data from large epidemiological studies could help to develop efficient measures of early prevention. Data collection by self-administered online tools could drastically reduce the logistical and financial burden of such large-scale investigations. In this context, it is important to obtain data concerning the comparability of such new online tools with traditional, supervised modes of cognitive assessment. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare self-administration of the Web-based NutriNet-Santé cognitive test battery (NutriCog) with administration by a neuropsychologist. METHODS: The test battery included four tests, measuring, among others aspects, psychomotor speed, attention, executive function, episodic memory, working memory, and associative memory. Both versions of the cognitive battery were completed by 189 volunteers (either self-administered version first, n=99, or supervised version first, n=90). Subjects also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Concordance was assessed by Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Agreement between both versions varied according to the investigated cognitive task and outcome variable. Spearman correlations ranged between .42 and .73. Moreover, a majority of participants responded that they “absolutely” or “rather” agreed that the duration of the self-administered battery was acceptable (184/185, 99.5%), that the tasks were amusing (162/185, 87.6%), that the instructions were sufficiently detailed (168/185; 90.8%) and understandable (164/185, 88.7%), and that they had overall enjoyed the test battery (182/185, 98.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The self-administered version of the Web-based NutriCog cognitive test battery provided similar information as the supervised version. Thus, integrating repeated cognitive evaluations into large cohorts via the implementation of self-administered online versions of traditional test batteries appears to be feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4837293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48372932016-05-06 Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study Assmann, Karen E Bailet, Marion Lecoffre, Amandine C Galan, Pilar Hercberg, Serge Amieva, Hélène Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Dementia is a major public health problem, and repeated cognitive data from large epidemiological studies could help to develop efficient measures of early prevention. Data collection by self-administered online tools could drastically reduce the logistical and financial burden of such large-scale investigations. In this context, it is important to obtain data concerning the comparability of such new online tools with traditional, supervised modes of cognitive assessment. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare self-administration of the Web-based NutriNet-Santé cognitive test battery (NutriCog) with administration by a neuropsychologist. METHODS: The test battery included four tests, measuring, among others aspects, psychomotor speed, attention, executive function, episodic memory, working memory, and associative memory. Both versions of the cognitive battery were completed by 189 volunteers (either self-administered version first, n=99, or supervised version first, n=90). Subjects also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Concordance was assessed by Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Agreement between both versions varied according to the investigated cognitive task and outcome variable. Spearman correlations ranged between .42 and .73. Moreover, a majority of participants responded that they “absolutely” or “rather” agreed that the duration of the self-administered battery was acceptable (184/185, 99.5%), that the tasks were amusing (162/185, 87.6%), that the instructions were sufficiently detailed (168/185; 90.8%) and understandable (164/185, 88.7%), and that they had overall enjoyed the test battery (182/185, 98.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The self-administered version of the Web-based NutriCog cognitive test battery provided similar information as the supervised version. Thus, integrating repeated cognitive evaluations into large cohorts via the implementation of self-administered online versions of traditional test batteries appears to be feasible. JMIR Publications Inc. 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4837293/ /pubmed/27049114 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4862 Text en ©Karen E Assmann, Marion Bailet, Amandine C Lecoffre, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Hélène Amieva, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.04.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Assmann, Karen E Bailet, Marion Lecoffre, Amandine C Galan, Pilar Hercberg, Serge Amieva, Hélène Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study |
title | Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study |
title_full | Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study |
title_short | Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study |
title_sort | comparison between a self-administered and supervised version of a web-based cognitive test battery: results from the nutrinet-santé cohort study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27049114 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assmannkarene comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy AT bailetmarion comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy AT lecoffreamandinec comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy AT galanpilar comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy AT hercbergserge comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy AT amievahelene comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy AT kesseguyotemmanuelle comparisonbetweenaselfadministeredandsupervisedversionofawebbasedcognitivetestbatteryresultsfromthenutrinetsantecohortstudy |