Cargando…
Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture
PURPOSE: The rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible is a challenge due to various limiting factors, of which the available vertical restorative space (AVRS) has been well understood in the literature. However, other anatomic variations such as arch form, arch size, and also the interforaminal dis...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27141161 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176541 |
_version_ | 1782427899435941888 |
---|---|
author | Bhargava, Akshay Sehgal, Manoti Gupta, Sharad Mehra, Praful |
author_facet | Bhargava, Akshay Sehgal, Manoti Gupta, Sharad Mehra, Praful |
author_sort | Bhargava, Akshay |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible is a challenge due to various limiting factors, of which the available vertical restorative space (AVRS) has been well understood in the literature. However, other anatomic variations such as arch form, arch size, and also the interforaminal distance (IFD) (due to the presence of mandibular nerve) are influential in the selection of size and position of implants, and thereby the prosthetic design. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In the present study, 30 edentulous patients from a group of 300 edentulous patients, representing all the three jaw relations (Class I, II, and III) were evaluated for designing a classification that could help in a comprehensive treatment plan for the edentulous mandible. Dental panoramic radiographs of each individual with a trial or final prosthesis were made. The horizontal IFD and AVRS values were calculated. RESULTS: One-way analysis of variance followed by post-hoc test (multiple comparison) and Bonferroni method having P < 0.05 as significant value showed an overall mean of 38.9 mm for horizontal distance and 13.69 mm for the AVRS in 30 edentulous patients. CONCLUSION: The results showed that in the majority of cases (90%) there is insufficient space to place a bar attachment supported by five implants for mandibular overdentures. This suggests that a universal treatment plan cannot be followed due to varying anatomic factors. Hence, it becomes imperative to have a set of clinical guidelines based on the AVRS and IFD, for the selection of implant number and type of attachment. The article proposes a simple classification system based on the AVRS and IFD for establishing guidelines in the treatment planning of the edentulous mandible, to aid in selection of implant size, number, and position along with the associated prosthetic design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4837775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48377752017-04-01 Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture Bhargava, Akshay Sehgal, Manoti Gupta, Sharad Mehra, Praful J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article PURPOSE: The rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible is a challenge due to various limiting factors, of which the available vertical restorative space (AVRS) has been well understood in the literature. However, other anatomic variations such as arch form, arch size, and also the interforaminal distance (IFD) (due to the presence of mandibular nerve) are influential in the selection of size and position of implants, and thereby the prosthetic design. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In the present study, 30 edentulous patients from a group of 300 edentulous patients, representing all the three jaw relations (Class I, II, and III) were evaluated for designing a classification that could help in a comprehensive treatment plan for the edentulous mandible. Dental panoramic radiographs of each individual with a trial or final prosthesis were made. The horizontal IFD and AVRS values were calculated. RESULTS: One-way analysis of variance followed by post-hoc test (multiple comparison) and Bonferroni method having P < 0.05 as significant value showed an overall mean of 38.9 mm for horizontal distance and 13.69 mm for the AVRS in 30 edentulous patients. CONCLUSION: The results showed that in the majority of cases (90%) there is insufficient space to place a bar attachment supported by five implants for mandibular overdentures. This suggests that a universal treatment plan cannot be followed due to varying anatomic factors. Hence, it becomes imperative to have a set of clinical guidelines based on the AVRS and IFD, for the selection of implant number and type of attachment. The article proposes a simple classification system based on the AVRS and IFD for establishing guidelines in the treatment planning of the edentulous mandible, to aid in selection of implant size, number, and position along with the associated prosthetic design. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4837775/ /pubmed/27141161 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176541 Text en Copyright: © The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhargava, Akshay Sehgal, Manoti Gupta, Sharad Mehra, Praful Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture |
title | Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture |
title_full | Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture |
title_fullStr | Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture |
title_short | Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture |
title_sort | classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27141161 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhargavaakshay classificationsystemontheselectionofnumberofimplantsandsuperstructuredesignonthebasisavailableverticalrestorativespaceandinterforaminaldistanceforimplantsupportedmandibularoverdenture AT sehgalmanoti classificationsystemontheselectionofnumberofimplantsandsuperstructuredesignonthebasisavailableverticalrestorativespaceandinterforaminaldistanceforimplantsupportedmandibularoverdenture AT guptasharad classificationsystemontheselectionofnumberofimplantsandsuperstructuredesignonthebasisavailableverticalrestorativespaceandinterforaminaldistanceforimplantsupportedmandibularoverdenture AT mehrapraful classificationsystemontheselectionofnumberofimplantsandsuperstructuredesignonthebasisavailableverticalrestorativespaceandinterforaminaldistanceforimplantsupportedmandibularoverdenture |